Does anybody see any flaw's in this from Brian at two?
My forecast is off to a brilliant start , how can we judge that if it isnt issued yet? , whats to say the forecast wont be changed before its rlsd to make it seem
like the first half was bang on?
Ive seen numorus two lrf being terribly wrong , yet according to him they are bang on . I see it from ALOT of forecasters claiming to be terribly accurate but they arnt , is it a pride thing? , even piers corybn(?) does the same . I remember bringing it up a few times with even close range forecasters , they go " I GOT THIS RIGHT " and im thinking hold on ive got your forecast here it doesnt say this at all , but you get a right narky response YOU DIDN'T READ INTO IT CORRECTLY.
Why cant some just admit it was wrong and try an improve on it , nobody is perfect hell forecasting is hard enough as it is