Jump to content
Problems logging in? ×
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

BUSHY

Members
  • Posts

    85
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Location
    Raunds - Northants

BUSHY's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. At least an inch here in Raunds and really coming down heavily.
  2. Read this http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/01/climategate_cru_was_but_the_ti.html. It may make the anomaly chart more clear.
  3. I think that the answer lies here GW. "The company also hopes to link rural Alaska communities to the cable. It has applied for $350 million in federal stimulus money, nearly 5% of that total for broadband grant and loan program, for lines to eight hub communities in western and northern Alaska. The Asia-Europe line does not depend on stimulus money, Ebell said."
  4. Six inches here and fell after midnight. Roads are going to be bad.
  5. I am aware of that VP and yes, Ignore the into.
  6. VP I would like yor take on this paper. http://www.schmanck.de/FalsificationSchreuder.pdf
  7. New Monkton video http://www.prisonpla...-criminals.html
  8. It seems so VP. There have been manipulations identified already but without the complete code it will be difficult to pin down. (For instance, in the subfolder "osborn-tree6\mann\oldprog," there’s a program (Calibrate_mxd.pro) that calibrates the MXD data against available local instrumental summer (growing season) temperatures between 1911-1990, then merges that data into a new file. That file is then digested and further modified by another program (Pl_calibmxd1.pro), which creates calibration statistics for the MXD against the stored temperature and "estimates" (infills) figures where such temperature readings were not available. The file created by that program is modified once again by Pl_Decline.pro, which "corrects it" – as described by the author -- by "identifying" and "artificially" removing "the decline." <BR itxtvisited="1">But oddly enough, the series doesn’t begin its "decline adjustment" in 1960 -- the supposed year of the enigmatic "divergence." In fact, all data between 1930 and 1994 are subject to "correction."<BR itxtvisited="1">http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/11/crus_source_code_climategate_r.html<BR itxtvisited="1">
  9. I take that back, as I see more posts on code manipulation by various programmers familiar with FORTRAN etc. it is becoming clear that something is/was afoot.
  10. Pete, maybe not so much conspiracy as self delusion, group think, superior complex thing.
  11. Dev dont be juvenile, you know what I mean.
  12. It is all very well calling conspiracy, manipulation etc. BUT it appears that there has been manipulation of data and at this point there is definite proof in some cases. Perhaps and probably much more to come as the revelations of Pielke http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/26/climatgate-pielke-senior-on-the-ncdc-ccsp-report-strong-arm-tactics/. for instance brings to light hidden issues. Are and have we all been taken for fools? Yes, because the majority fail to question authority.
  13. Ok so all tall people are wet. heee hee (You're joking aren't you?) No i am not. There is more than circumstantial evidence of collusion now.
  14. Sorry Dev but this is only one station and the evidence of manipulation is tending to lean towards overwhelming. Similar stuff is now coming out from Australian records. The temperature data records worldwide appear to have been massaged and adjusted inappropriately. I think that an audit of all records regardless of cost is called for here.
×
×
  • Create New...