Jump to content
Thunder?
Local
Radar
Pollen
IGNORED

Global warming is real NOT!


ratty77

Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: St.Albans
  • Location: St.Albans

    ok

    people say that the increase in temprature is to do

    with global warming it is not. It is actaully caused

    by the amount and size of sunspots you know what they are if not heres a pic of them at the bottom

    did you know that the oxegen in the earths atmosphere is only 9% but on mercury it is 40% and that is why millions of years ago things on the earth were much biger than they are today

    SUNSPOTS

    575px-Sunspot_with_Earth_Comparison.jpg

    ratty77

    if you matched a global warming chart to a

    sunspot chart they are identical witch some

    scintists found out quite recently. This proves

    that global warming is not real there is proof.

    we do contriute a little though.

    for more info about us contributing read Global warming is real NOT! 2

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    • Replies 88
    • Created
    • Last Reply
    Posted
  • Location: St.Albans
  • Location: St.Albans

    there is a terible creature that one day will kill

    you when you dont expect them and do awful

    things US we are very very slowly contributing

    to climate change though more than everyone

    is saying we do not cause all of it as i said in

    Global warming is real NOT!1 its the sun but it

    is our fault as well we do not care like in dumped

    on channel 4 people wont change they will keep

    on ruwerning the plannet all the time that mans way

    deforestation.jpg

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Posted
  • Location: Up Hill Down Dale
  • Weather Preferences: Long hot summers and Deepest darkest snows of Winter
  • Location: Up Hill Down Dale

    This is an argument that some developing nations use to justify their growth, and partly why the USA has been slow to impose any regulation on its fossil fuel burning.

    However, the evidence and analysis of it by the unbiased mainstream scientific community has demonstrated anthroporphic driven climate change.

    The program you saw was probably on C4 or some other sensationalist broadcaster which find odd-ball scientists to justify their conspiracy agenda programs: a nice way to drive their budgets with dumbed-down science (how many of these 'documentaries' site mainstream views from respected institutions? Big fat zero).

    If you want the facts, you're better off subscribing to decent scientific journals in which peer review maintains the status quo, rather than some TV producer.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Posted
  • Location: St.Albans
  • Location: St.Albans

    what im trying to say here is that

    IF global warming is coming it is

    coming very slowely and that people

    are the main reason read

    Global warming is real NOT!2---humans

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Posted
  • Location: Taunton, Somerset
  • Weather Preferences: Snow, thunder, strong winds. HATE:stagnant weather patterns
  • Location: Taunton, Somerset
    oxegen in the earths atmosphere is only 9%

    Sorry, but I stopped reading when I got this far. Try adding about another 12% to that figure.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Posted
  • Location: St.Albans
  • Location: St.Albans

    all co2 can be got rid of any there are many benafits of this

    -saving the enviroment

    -stoping co2 rising

    -increse oxegen

    if we had 80% oxegen levels on earth

    then we would all be more healthy as

    well becuase we would get more oxegen

    in our bloodstreem and would be more

    fit and capable of better things

    250px-Coastredwood.jpg

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Posted
  • Location: Taunton, Somerset
  • Weather Preferences: Snow, thunder, strong winds. HATE:stagnant weather patterns
  • Location: Taunton, Somerset
    trees are one of our options to save

    the world but another is

    Global warming is real NOT! 4--other options

    Why don't you just do everything in one topic?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Posted
  • Location: St.Albans
  • Location: St.Albans

    future topics to watch out for

    Global warming is real NOT! 5--earths end

    Global warming is real NOT! 6--life eslewere

    Global warming is real NOT! 7--all again

    out 1st october/november/december

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Posted
  • Location: Darton, Barnsley south yorkshire, 102 M ASL
  • Location: Darton, Barnsley south yorkshire, 102 M ASL
    all co2 can be got rid of any there are many benafits of this

    -saving the enviroment

    -stoping co2 rising

    -increse oxegen

    if we had 80% oxegen levels on earth

    then we would all be more healthy as

    well becuase we would get more oxegen

    in our bloodstreem and would be more

    fit and capable of better things

    250px-Coastredwood.jpg

    If the oxygen levels on earth were 80% we would die within 30 seconds if that. This level of oxygen is devestatingly toxic to mammals. :)

    For pete's sake mods HEEEEELP :)

    Chassis

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Posted
  • Location: Colchester, Essex, UK (33m ASL)
  • Location: Colchester, Essex, UK (33m ASL)

    80% oxygen would also make a pretty darned explosive atmosphere with almost constant fires and fireballs.

    Please check your sources and science.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Posted
  • Location: Colchester, Essex, UK (33m ASL)
  • Location: Colchester, Essex, UK (33m ASL)

    Mercury may have 40%...but 40% of what total, you could have 40 litres of gaseous oxygen on Mercury, 60 litres of gaseous nitrogen...the figures would show 40% oxygen in the atmosphere on Mercury, but is in no way a true comparison to the atmosphere on Earth as we all know.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Posted
  • Location: Aviemore
  • Location: Aviemore

    Merged all the threads together, but we will keep an eye on this thread. Please do remember to report issues to the team by hitting the complain button.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Posted
  • Location: Sheffield South Yorkshire 160M Powering the Sheffield Shield
  • Weather Preferences: Any Extreme
  • Location: Sheffield South Yorkshire 160M Powering the Sheffield Shield

    Perhaps he's referring to this.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3869753.stm

    to add more confusion.

    http://www.unisci.com/stories/20022/0613022.htm or http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/lia/possible_causes.html or http://www.whoi.edu/oceanus/viewArticle.do?id=18371

    Interesting that most papers are fairly "old" suggesting this idea may have gone out fashion for now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Posted
  • Location: Sheffield South Yorkshire 160M Powering the Sheffield Shield
  • Weather Preferences: Any Extreme
  • Location: Sheffield South Yorkshire 160M Powering the Sheffield Shield
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Posted
  • Location: south London
  • Location: south London

    theres also a issue that relay global warming is not caused by the amount of co2 we use from scientists...that we go through many phases of climate change anyway..and the government are using this to get more money out of us...I have heard a few good points over time from scientists from talk sport about global warming is rubbish.....yea they agree that the co2 as made it worse BUT not the cause.And the earth goes in cycles.And the goverment are making the most of it through taxes ect....just a thought

    Furthermore, those same records show that the Arctic warmed twice as fast between 1917 and 1937 as it has in the past 20 years. After 1940, the Arctic saw a big cool-down and climatologists noted sea ice expanding in the northern Atlantic. Christy argues that what he calls the Great Climate Shift occurred in the late 1970s and caused another sudden warming in the Arctic. Since the late 1970s there has not been much additional warming in the region at all. In fact, on page 23, the Arctic Council Assessment offers very similar data for Arctic temperature trends from 60 degrees north latitude—the area that includes most of Alaska and essentially all of Greenland, most of Norway and Sweden, and the bulk of Russia.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Archived

    This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

    Guest
    This topic is now closed to further replies.
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...