Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?
IGNORED

Model Output Discussion - January 12th.


Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: Hampstead / Cambridge
  • Location: Hampstead / Cambridge

yup no major differences coming out from GFS - still sticking firmly to its guns. its showdown time clearly, but lets wait to see how GFS develops, only in the early stages of the 06Z so far. round 1000

EDIT: slightly better amplification and jet orientation at 150?

Edited by ITSY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Broxbourne, Herts
  • Weather Preferences: Snow snow and snow
  • Location: Broxbourne, Herts

That trough causes problems later on though as it shoots off north when the ECM tries to bring it down over the UK

GFS bings it further south now....doesn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Sowerby Bridge, West Yorkshire
  • Weather Preferences: Click on my name - sorry, it was too long to fit here......
  • Location: Sowerby Bridge, West Yorkshire

Splits the PV earlier this run but still has the jet stream fired up to push it further East than ECM. Has it stalled to our North?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Liverpool
  • Location: Liverpool

GFS not backing down.

you can see clear difference at 120h GFS has a biglow coming off the ES much faster which will prevent any ridging from the Atlantic.

Over to the UKMO/ECM.

Disagree slightly here

h500slp.pngh500slp.png

The low to our north is pushing much more troughing into scandinavia, if that were slightly further west, it would be getting closer to ecm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Aberporth S W Wales
  • Location: Aberporth S W Wales

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn1381.png

The major difference between the 2 seems to be the low ejected from the US which refuses to head NE up the western side of Greenland as per ECM. Without that there is no scope for pressure rise up to southern greenland and therefore the pattern remains flat...ECM must change in line with GFS tonight...surely

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Newbury, Berkshire. 107m ASL.
  • Weather Preferences: Summer:sunny, some Thunder,Winter:cold & snowy spells,Other:transitional
  • Location: Newbury, Berkshire. 107m ASL.

Please add a bit more detailed analysis guys n gals. :good: No more one liners. EXPLANATIONS ABOUT EXPECTATIONS ARE ALWAYS WELCOME. ;)

Sorry mods.

gottolovethisweather

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Polesworth, North Warwickshire 104m asl
  • Weather Preferences: SNOW!
  • Location: Polesworth, North Warwickshire 104m asl

Thanks for the explanation everyone - for some reason I was thinking that the models wouldn't take account of predicted stratospheric warming until that warming had actually happened and could be keyed as part of the input data for a run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Home: Chingford, London (NE). Work: London (C)
  • Weather Preferences: Winter: cold and snowy. Summer: hot and sunny
  • Location: Home: Chingford, London (NE). Work: London (C)

http://www.wetterzen...s/Rtavn1381.png

The major difference between the 2 seems to be the low ejected from the US which refuses to head NE up the western side of Greenland as per ECM. Without that there is no scope for pressure rise up to southern greenland and therefore the pattern remains flat...ECM must change in line with GFS tonight...surely

Must it? Both ECM and the GFS are sticking doggedly their outputs, no one can yet say who is which is wrong and which is right.

I actually think there has been a very subtle shift in the 12z towards the UKMO and ECM. More troughing into Scandi, slightly more of a NW-SE tilt, slightly more ridging of heights towards Greenland. The pattern looks less flat. But still some way off what the ECM is showing at the same time frame.

Edited by danm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Hayward’s Heath - home, Brighton/East Grinstead - work.
  • Weather Preferences: Snow and storms
  • Location: Hayward’s Heath - home, Brighton/East Grinstead - work.

Aternoon all. We are seeing the GFS 12Z playing around with splitting a lobe of PV off and it heading towards Scandi. That to me is a little step closer to the ECM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Hampstead / Cambridge
  • Location: Hampstead / Cambridge

as us being said, the movement of the low pressure in Canada is absolutely vital - if it skirts west up greenland we're in a la ECM, if it is pushed into the northern mid atlantic then good bye to hieght rises! minimal differences at this stage generally - Israel and Lebanon get the cold! thats a turn up for any Middle Eastern members we may (or may not) have!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Carryduff, County Down 420ft ASL
  • Location: Carryduff, County Down 420ft ASL
Posted · Hidden by Osbourne One-Nil, January 13, 2012 - Let's wait 10 mins and see shall we?
Hidden by Osbourne One-Nil, January 13, 2012 - Let's wait 10 mins and see shall we?

UKMO all important, only around ten minutes to wait, will it side with the ECM, GFS or a half way house?

Link to comment
Posted
  • Location: Live Haddenham (Bucks). Work Heathrow Airport
  • Location: Live Haddenham (Bucks). Work Heathrow Airport

All we need to see is the GFS moving things West then we would be in pretty much the same set up as the ECM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Hampstead / Cambridge
  • Location: Hampstead / Cambridge

UKMO looks more like ECM at +96 than GFS, with the high further south and the cold in place over Europe...lets see

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...