Death of a spruce tree

[knocker]

Study of black spruce forest means trees might store more carbon than thought

 

http://Study of black spruce forest means trees might store more carbon than thought

Edited October 2, 2013 by knocker

[laserguy]

That's cos' trees and plants an' stuff just lurve carbon (dioxide) - they can't get enough of it and want it all to themselves. Link doesn't work... but that's no problem because it'll most likely be more AGW claptrap and I wouldn't have got past the first sentence anyway.

 

Pete - how can you like the post when you can't read the content... or is it just me?

Edited October 3, 2013 by laserguy

[knocker]

I don't know what's happened to the link LG. Try this. I know you can't wait to read it.

 

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-10/dnnl-doa100213.php

[laserguy]

Thanks - I managed to wade thru' it but it was still boring. Noticed how they twice mentioned trees growing faster cos' of elevated CO2 levels, yet I'm sure some argued on here that without extra other-nutrients, CO2 alone couldn't pull off that trick... Sees - told ya they want it all for themselves, they know a good thing when they see it.