Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Big Bear

Members
  • Posts

    67
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Big Bear

  1. Unlike other hostile views of Paul's post, i think this topic is something a lot of us are interested in, seeing whether the current trend of cooler weather continues into Autumn or whether the climate in general carries on above average as expected.

    I'm certainly not expecting a mass temperature plunge giving another winter 1962/63 but whats happening now is certainly worth noting and deserves a thread of it's own.

    Well done Paul for starting it.

  2. Hello big bear - I like your photograph! You had better get 'er indoors to knit some thick wooly gloves if we are going to get all that snow! Meanwhile, I am looking at two greenhouses full of green tomatoes, peppers and chillies waiting for some 'B' sun! Sure

    ly, there won't be any moisture left to fall as snow later! Kind regards Big Bear so glad you are still about.

    Hello Sue and thanks. I don't think we're in for a very warm August but it would be nice to get some more sun - that's for sure!

    Since this summer has almost been written off I am prematurely looking forward to winter 07/08, especially with the encouraging early NAO signal.

  3. In the infinity of space, it would be very naive to assume we are the only form of life that exists, has ever existed, or may exist in the future.

    Several scientists from NASA and Stanford University announced their findings of ancient, fossilized, microscopic life from a Martian meteorite, known as ALH84001. The meteorite was catapulted away from Mars fifteen million years ago when a huge comet or asteroid impacted the surface. The meteorite travelled through space for millions of years and then encountered the Earth. It entered Earth's atmosphere about thirteen thousand years ago and landed at Antarctica. The meteorite lay there until 1984, when a team from the NASA Johnson Space Center found it while exploring the Allan Hills ice field, and brought it back to Houston. It was initially classified as a lunar meteorite, but in 1993 was correctly identified as from Mars. It is one of only twelve "SNC" meteorites, which match the unique chemical signature of Mars.

    So when you consider the existence of us, and evidence of other life BOTH sharing a relatively minature pocket of space, to write off the idea of extraterrestrial life would be IMO rather narrow minded.

    The fact we have not established commuication from outer space is down to the sheer lack of speed & distance of our radio signals, which SETI transmit 24 hours a day 7 days a week, hoping for a reply, when in reality we have covered an area the size of a pea in the Atlantic ocean. Still, even today The first signal pulse transmitted in the 70's has only reached a relatively short distance. For a signal to reach ET life and be replied to, just doubles the waiting time.

    Whether space in in fact infinate or not, is the ultimate question which will probably never be answered.

  4. Can someone more experienced (Caranthian?) please give a brief analysis on the arctic ice behaviour in 2005 on the other side of the globe to us. I would like to see if there is a correlation between higher ice levels in the East Russia/ West Canada regionand the extreme cold & record snowfall that struck Japan in winter 05/06

    links attached:

    http://www.snowjapan.com/e/gallery/index-snowy-japan.html

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4591950.stm

  5. I gather from another thread that ice formation on "our side" of the Arctic is much better than this time last year. I imagine that without a heatwave (yet) this Summer our SSTs will be a bit lower than last year, too.

    Now to my very simple mind this is looking positive for an increased amount of :lol: this Winter!

    In support of this theory I would like to remind people that winter 05/06 (or 06/07 - can't remember which) Japan and parts of the far east at similar latitude had the coldest & certainly the snowiest winter for nearly a century. Arctic ice was more prominent on the opposite side of the globe to us that year, while we bathed in mild rubbish. My point is, who's to say the sypnosis cannot be reversed this year providing the ice build/ pattern continues as it is at present, plunging NW Europe into a deep freeze with record snowfall.

    All in the name of speculation of course.

    Here we are - it was winter 05/06. A couple of links related to the heavy falls of that winter in Japan:

    http://www.snowjapan.com/e/gallery/index-snowy-japan.html

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4591950.stm

  6. Several members have mentioned that "our side" of the Arctic is doing quite well, but not so the "other side".

    Now here is what will probably sound like a silly idea, but......could it be that the effect of this will be to sort of bring the ice cap a bit more over the top of the Earth so that it might influence our weather a bit more? You know....more of it on "our" side than "their" side.

    Carinth.......as an aside, there is a huge boulder not far from me which has been a roadside "signpost" for ever (as far as I am aware!) It contains carved placenames with carved hands and pointing fingers. Looks Victorian or even earlier. The Council do maintain this wondeful thing, I'm glad to say!

    Yes that could hold some logic since high pressure blocks are influenced by snow covered areas and a nice anti cyclone to our north could be aided by this with the polar high shifting towards Europe. Also there is evidence that extensive snow reflects solar radiation, further increasing the likelyhood of below average surface temps, providing the cold is there in the first place!

  7. The signs look good for a slightly below average winter 07/08 in my opinion. I know we've heard it all before but the SSTs and the NAO throughout April, beginnging & end of May, June AND July has been moderately to strongly negative.

    Clocking up below average temps is the next milestone. A cool July will get people talking but we'll need at least a couple more below av. months before December before I start getting really interested.

  8. Hi SB

    I am talking about the downs in a line from Arundel through east to Worthing & Brighton

    What are your thoughts??

    Altitude - I'm assuming when you say you're on the downs you're above sea level by a couple of hundred metres or so?

    Hi Paul sorry having some problems with the site. Yes I believe Cissbury ring is about 200m ASL, but will the towns south of the downs just see rain? I suppose it depends on the timing of the front?

  9. Can anyone tell me how they think the south downs will do? i.e. Cissbury & Chanctonbury Ring?

    I live only a couple of miles from the coast so will I even see wet snow/ sleet/ or nothing but rain?

    I am doubtful of seeing anything on the ground other than puddles... hopefully someone can better this??

    HELP?!

  10. Can anyone tell me how they think the south downs will do? i.e. Cissbury & Chanctonbury Ring?

    I live only a couple of miles from the coast so will I even see wet snow/ sleet/ or nothing but rain?

    I am doubtful of seeing anything on the ground other than puddles... hopefully someone can better this??

    HELP?!

  11. Does anyone think it is possible, or can anyone actually help produce a hindcast model, where data from previous years, leading up to classic cold spells can be fed into current systems to produce a 'mock' ensembles.

    It would be facinating to see how the ensembles would behave with forecasted GFS data (for example) for the early part of Jan 87, 1963 or 1947.

    The aim would be to test how accurate the current models are by testing old data as new input, then analysing how far out a classic cold spell is potentially spotted.

    Thoughts & discussion please.

  12. In 1998, physicists at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), along with two European groups, turned dreams into reality by successfully teleporting a photon, a particle of energy that carries light. The Caltech group was able to read the atomic structure of a photon, send this information across 1 meter (3.28 feet) of coaxial cable and create a replica of the photon. As predicted, the original photon no longer existed once the replica was made.

    The most recent successful teleportation experiment took place on October 4, 2006 at the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen, Denmark. Dr. Eugene Polzik and his team teleported information stored in a laser beam into a cloud of atoms. According to Polzik, "It is one step further because for the first time it involves teleportation between light and matter, two different objects. One is the carrier of information and the other one is the storage medium" [ref]. The information was teleported a little more than three feet (half a meter), as opposed to the minute distances achieved in previous experiments.

    The examples of this method described do not appear to be successful attempts at teleportation. Replicating something and putting a copy somewhere else is something very different.

    I wouldn't like to be cloned & killed in the same day in the name of science.

    I firmly believe teleportation will never be possible.

  13. I know people enjoy Steve's analysis, BB, and there is a terrific amount of knowledge and potential for learning in there, but the reason many people enjoy the analysis is because the analysis contains pointers to cold. The cold rampers, generally, aren't open to listening to a point of view which indictates a probability of warmth, even to the point of getting upset about it being expressed.

    ".....as we approach another winter season with hopefully lots of snow and that easterly we all long for." is a comment that shows exactly what I mean. Some of us are looking forward to the winter charts with just the same anticipation as we look at any charts. Snow would be really interesting, but record January temperatures would be just as interesting to me. We don't all "long for" anything. Many of us are just constantly fascinated by what comes along and are really intersted in the changing gfs charts, whatever they show.

    Personally, I'm far more interested in trying to forecast correctly from the long-range gfs, than I am trying to forecast a particular type of weather. Snow is a real event, as we get so little in GWUK and it will be great to try and hone my gfs LRF method on winter charts and see if I can continue the success I've had over the summer, but there is no way I'm going to be constantly looking for one type of weather at the expense of all others. That's just so selective as to be silly to me. I'll bet I get called a cold ramper, amongst other things, at some stage this winter when I make a "spot" of colder weather. mind you there will be so many spotting cold weather as soon as it appears at the edge of reality on the T+360gfs, that I'm sure my own spots will be drowned. I just hope those people are prepared to keep a public record of what they do and have their record of LR prediction open to scrutiny, instead of claiming "I saw that 2 weeks ago", when cold comes, when they've been crying that particular "wolf" week after week, then got lucky.

    It will snow this winter. It will also get cold. Overall, I think the chances are that it will be milder than average and I am more than happy to explain those reasons in depth on any thread in which someone asks me to.

    Paul

    Paul, I'm sorry you take offense to people's ineterest in cold weather, cold ramping and talk of easterlies, but at the end of the day theres nothing wrong with it and I'm just as entitled to do so as I am regarding the beloved jet stream/ atlantic westerly weather types.

    Steve's analysis is one concentrating on cold potential (it is a WINTER analysis afterall) so of course it is going to contain pointers to cold, and subsequently attract interest from the large majority of members during the winter season.

    In reality, Mr Realist, most of the winter posters actually do long for an easterly like Jan 87 or Feb 91. I'm sure I'm not alone in thinking that. Maybe we can do a poll on your bets section? :)

    Yes, the charts are always interesting... just a bit more so when they show ice days and snow set ups at T+90 hrs... its all part of the fun & excitement.

    I'm beginning to think you relish in trying to stamp the hopes of the snow lovers on here? :) ..perhaps it gives you a sense of GW minded authority ;) it just seems a little over eager.

    By the way, is GWUK your own acronym or a commonly used & recognised one?

×
×
  • Create New...