Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Alkyd

Members
  • Posts

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Alkyd

  1. A very wet, dark and miserable afternoon. The pressure has just stopped falling and is looking upwards again. Had a gust of 32mph about half an hour go, but wind has eased a little, now 10mph.

    Pressure reached 1006mb but now 1007mb. Temperature falling, now 9.7C; dew point falling like a stone from 10C to 5.5C in half an hour.

  2. Alkyd, you should be able to find a graph showing this correlation in one of the links on the 'basics of Environment Change' pin at the top of the forum board. The global rise graph show a trend line, not an anticipated rise line; a predicted mean temperature; hence the straight line.

    Current prediction for 2100 is one of the variables which is most difficult to predict, as it involves human nature, behaviour, and assumptions about global population and economic growth. This is why the IPCC set six different scenarios for CO2 rise, based on a defined set of assumptions about our future behaviour. The 'standard' scenario nowadays is the low-mid emissions scenario; some attempt to control CO2 before 2050, slow down beyond that to almost zero by 2100. This version estimates a level of about 450 ppm by 2050. At the moment, we are on 380ppm, and rising by 2.1% per year: we aren't going to hold emissions to 450 ppm.

    The Stern report uses 550 ppm as it's 2100 baseline, but this much extra CO2 might increase temperatures by 3C; about a degree more than what is considered to be the 'tolerable limit' of climate change.

    If the information on the 'Basics' pin isn't useful, let us know & we'll try to find something else for you.

    :)P

    Thanks for that P3. I guess I had been a touch lazy in not checking all the info out. However I was really referencing the "information" link on the previous post :blush: which certainly didn't tell all the story.

  3. I've just found this Information

    Quite interesting I though for some basic information.

    It does show a correlation between the rise in CO2 emmissions and Global Temperature.

    The only thing i'm dubious of, is the prediction of temperature to 2100.

    1980 and beyond seems to be the key, and really, there has been an influx of industrial output, car emissions, flight emissions et al.

    But will CO2 emissions grow at the rate predicted in this information?

    Does temperature rise in linear to CO2 emissions, or does a certain quantity of CO2 emissions create a consistant warming (i.e. is emmissions stay at the same level, will the global temperature continue increasing, or will it also level out)?

    One thing is true about GW. Its not an easy science.

    The information shown in the link doesn't actually predict what the CO2 will be in 2100, although a graph is shown predicting the temperature to 2100. I would like to have seen what the mathematical correlation between the two was between roughly 1800 and 2000 which takes in the period when the CO2 started to rise.

    From observation alone of the graphs, the CO2 rise is exponential but global temperature rise linear. What sort of correlation coefficient is there?

    I don't expect an answer from here, but it does beg the question.

×
×
  • Create New...