Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Kained

Members
  • Posts

    45
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Kained

  1. Seriously Lauren and Weather ship, energy security is a fundamental concern for any nation state. By localising energy production you secure access to that energy.

  2. I'm sure there's more recent material but as jethro outlines, the Sun's effect has previously been relegated as it has been perceived as a constant allowing greenhouse gases to take a more prominent role.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7327393.stm

    "Scientists have produced further compelling evidence showing that modern-day climate change is not caused by changes in the Sun's activity."

    http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11650-climate-myths-global-warming-is-down-to-the-sun-not-humans.html

    "The 2007 IPCC report halved the maximum likely influence of solar forcing on warming over the past 250 years from 40% to 20%."

    "Similarly, there is no trend in direct measurements of the Sun's ultraviolet output and in cosmic rays. So for the period for which we have direct, reliable records, the Earth has warmed dramatically even though there has been no corresponding rise in any kind of solar activity."

    http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/news/19990408/

    "According to Shindell, the new study also confirms that changing levels of energy from the sun are not a major cause of global warming."

  3. Life evolved in CO2 concentrations that were lower than 300 ppm. We are at 390ppm now and on course for disaster.

    Seriously? Even if you were only looking at the human evolutionary period, that statement would still be factually incorrect.

  4. Think on it as a positive step Moomin. Tim Berners-Lee invented the concepts of the World Wide Web to "facilitate sharing and updating information among researchers" this idea is reaching the next level of maturity, the scientific community will be better for it.

  5. The gap on that poll has widened a bit further with 5448 counted in and 6882 counted out at the time of typing this.

    It's now:

    768 counted in so far

    5240 counted out so far

    The variation in poll numbers has been interesting. Perhaps they've been spammed by invalid submissions, or perhaps had trouble with the code.

  6. Yet when we watch the Narwhals beaching,Walrus's starving Polar Bears drowning in deep ocean we choose to deny it's occurring.

    I'd really like to see your evidence for Polar Bear drownings being on the increase?

    As far as i knew they are very good swimmers and Ian Stirling ("Behavior". Polar Bears. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 1988) cites them being seen up to 200 miles from land?

  7. If you look at some of the date able evidence that has presented over the past 20yrs, from the 'ice man' (5,000yrs) in the alps to tree stumps in the Rockies glaciers (8,000yrs), that obviously has not been subjected to such ablation since ice entombment you have to ask "Why now?"

    You're willing to ask the question "Why now?" but what about the question "Why then?". Ozti the Iceman had been crossing the alps allegedly as part of a raiding party but had died from wounds in combat and allegedly had an arrowhead removed from him at the scene of death. It must have been cold to preserve the body but not cold enough the outweigh removing the copper arrowhead. Otzi was then, over time, entombed in the ice.

    So if you can ascribe meaning to finding his body now what meaning can be ascribed to bronze age man engage in combat in the heights of the Alps 5000 years ago?

  8. But it still amounts to 'I don't like any of you, so for ten whole minutes I'll get off my butt and write four words on the ballot paper'. To my mind it's not exactly putting the effort in for change.

    I think if people don't like our politicians and the job they do they should stand for election themselves or stop criticising.

    Actually, purposeful spoiling of a ballot paper does have an effect, perhaps not on the current instance of the vote but if enough votes are spoilt then it should be a way of showing politicians that they are not offering a choice worthy of the vote. Far better than not voting at all and something anyone can do without becoming politically active.

    I agree entirely with your second sentence.

  9. It looks like a sensor on a satellite has failed. It thus has precisely zero to do with AGW, or 'Hansen' or 'Gore' - - but I'm sure some one, somewhere will try to make the association :lazy:

    You just did?

    The issue is if that data has been used for research, the media has publicised it or it has be used to affect public policy.

    It is good NSIDC have publicly acknowledged a problem, open honesty about data builds trust.

  10. We cannot predict evolution.

    Charles Darwin disagrees with you...

    Charles Darwin's prediction:

    Darwin first saw this astonishing orchid from Madagascar, Angraecum sesquipedale, in 1862. Its foot-long green throat holds nectar—the sweet liquid that draws pollinators—but only at its very tip. "Astounding," Darwin wrote, of this strange adaptation. "What insect could suck it?" He predicted that Madagascar must be home to an insect with an incredibly long feeding tube, or proboscis. Entomologists were dubious: no such insect had ever been found there.

    Charles Darwin died in 1882, and more than 40 years later, his insight was confirmed. A naturalist in Madagascar discovered the giant hawk moth, which hovers like a hummingbird as its long, whip-like proboscis probes for the distant nectar. The moth's scientific name, Xanthopan morganii praedicta, honors the prediction of the scientist who never saw it, but whose theory told him that it must exist.

  11. Don't we have that via the back door? With monitoring now able to flag deformities early on in pregnancies terminations are common place. Come the time where sex,eye colour,stature are a thing of choice we will be even further into 'acceptable Eugenics'. (IMHO of course)

    I suggest you read up on Charles Davenport and the Cold Spring Harbor Lab. James Watson feared such a similarity and set up the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications Program. There is a vast difference between genetic screening and the sterilisation and euthanasia of those deemed genetically impure. I believe you know the ultimate outcome of the eugenics movement?

  12. You're bang on right guys, scientists shouldn't tell govt.s what to do eh? Smoking,STD's,traffic speed,lead in petrol who are they to tell us what to do? :lol:

    Well actually no, scientists shouldn't tell the government what to do, scientists are not afforded any special treatment under universal suffrage. Scientist can of course provide information to the government for the government to make informed decisions but it is for the government representing the people to make those decisions.

    Don't start with lists, scientist are not infallible, the top of my opposing list would start with eugenics.

  13. Perhaps were not looking at the core of the arguement, when Albert Einstein wrote his paper on mass-energy equivalence, he was not well known, he was not at the top of the field, he didn't have the sort of credentials people are putting so much onus on.

    What he did have was good solid science.

    Science is not something to be locked away behind credentials, science is something that should be verifiable and repeatable. Given the right environment and methodology i could split an atom, i could sequence my DNA so i should be able to replicate climate models and test for validity given a set of parameters.

  14. Indeed, people can put what they like in the bin, they just have to face the consequences.

    I can't find a link but the Discovery Channel had an episode on a recycling plant in the US that could take mixed waste. Government investment in such technology could have resolved the problem but instead what we got was an inefficient system of separating waste, additional collections, additional staffing and a burden on the public.

    Recycling then wouldn't have been such an issue. Was it political ineptitude or was it politically useful? The last part of your sentence certainly makes it seem like a useful tool to achieve public compliance.

×
×
  • Create New...