Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

captain jack

Members
  • Posts

    25
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by captain jack

  1. 8 minutes ago, CreweCold said:

    Never rely solely on the interpretation of others...It sounds harder than it is to interpret NWP output, once you get the hang of it the first thing you will end up doing is looking at the models and forming your own conclusions. This forum then acts as a subsidiary to cross check the views of others and perhaps supplement your own views with the views of some of the seasoned members on here (and there are a fair few). 

    Yes, there have been a fair few trolls over the years but most members on here are well meaning, even if they only profess to possess a rudimentary handle on all things NWP!

    Fair points made, I just do not have the time to study all the outputs, hence my reliability on others for information.

    • Like 3
  2. 21 minutes ago, CreweCold said:

    Conversely you have to remember that using teleconnections also relies on using data which is a projection to some extent. I've seen plenty of instances where promising background signals have faded into obscurity along with the stellar model output. November 2016 being a case in point, just 3 months ago. 

    I don't think people aim to disappoint the majority as for one that line of thinking comes across as slightly paranoid and secondly, people cannot control weather or the atmosphere- they can merely comment on what is unfolding and how they expect it to unfold going forward. Their point is just as valid as the so called 'positive' people whom you suggest seem to have more weighting on this forum. Just because it's something that you personally don't wish to hear, it doesn't mean that they are trolling or being negative nellies. 

    Soundbites like 'this is an unusual pattern for the models' and 'blocks won't be pushed aside so easily' and 'reverting to climatological norm' are fine but add nothing to the debate nor do they embellish any of the analysis of what we actually physically see represented in the modelling in front of us. Perspective and balance is sorely lacking sometimes in this thread. Being able to analyse model trends involves taking the rough with the smooth and not shutting your mind off to the less desirable outcome just because it's not what you want to see.

    I do not profess to have the knowledge of some on here and cannot read the charts as well as many, so rely on the interpretations of others. my point is not in the least paranoid as I am not attached to the outcome. I just want to see a balanced analysis based on more factors than one operational run as that is how you learn. I think you are being disingenuous to suggest that some people on here do not 'troll' as you put it and I am certainly not using soundbites, just logical thinking.

    • Like 4
  3. Welcome, the models tend to trade off spells of doing relatively well but this coming period is a more complex challenge than they often face, so how they've done in past week or so would be generally inconclusive. Also this zonal pattern has been easier for them and errors were much smaller than what we're likely to find looking back from the 27th. Experienced model watchers develop ideas about what models do in certain situations and what their strong or weak points might be. GFS used to be a bit notorious for over-deepening lows at 5-7 days then backing off towards actual time. GEM is often thought to be too prone to over-amplification. European is regarded as most likely to verify when there's a conflict, but not by a wide margin. This coming situation is low on analogues and high on uncertainty even today. A good guess might be made by considering which way each model has trended past three days and seeing if those trends point to a convergence point. The best forecast at any given point is probably the accumulation of least error after weighting the models by preference. At the moment, you could assume that a moderately deep low will cross northern Scotland around the 27th and head towards southern Norway or Denmark by the 28th but possibly factor in that it might head more south than southeast. What actually verifies could be different from what any model shows today. There have been situations in the past where no guidance was all that close at day 6, but this is rare nowadays.

    Thank you for your reply Roger. I respect your opinion and advice and so basically at the moment due to the current chaotic predictions the past cannot predict the future!

  4. Valid point Cap jack

     

    As alluded to by RJBW above the GFS P seems as though it has been the most accurate assuming the low comes off on saturday close to the UK. RJBW has counted as many as 16 runs out of 20 for the GFSP which is brilliant (if it comes off).

     

    Also of interest was the fact that a few of those 16 actually went for an Easterly afterwards..We will see.

     

    The latest 3 runs of GFSP have moved the bombing low more easterly, so it appears to have lost the signal at short range. If it is correct now then it means it will have failed on 16 out of 20!!!!

     

    There again ALL models are obviously been struggling to define some new trend which wants to set up in the medium term.. Hence their variability.    

     

    The ECM however only showed it on 2 or 3 charts of the low in the North sea or UK  at the same time..

     

    Interestingly nearly all the models have switched away from this bomb around the North Sea (though still some showing impacts), but in the last 24 hours the Euros (MO and ECM) have turned on to the idea of the low coming straight down the UK.

     

    Don't know what this  means in terms of stats, but it must  be seen as a feather  in the cap of the new GFSP, with its better resolution post 180hrs if it has picked it and stayed with it.

     

    MIA

    Thank you for your reply, I missed that post from RJBW, must pay more attention! 

    • Like 1
  5. I live in the same area as you. That photo from Titsey is in the Surrey Weather book. I always think of it when I drive over that spot. We live in a funny spot for snow but did really well Dec 10. Won't be the same this weekend but hopefully we won't do too badly

    Last year was fantastic. I always thought that moving down here from the North East would be good for business and bad for snow, but recently it has turned out good for both!

  6. well im happy knowing im not the oldest here :)

    Born in the winter of '63 although I can't remember much about it! Too young for the best winter of recent times and too young to remember the glory boys of 1966 although I made up for it with the 2003 rugby world cup!

    I do remember growing up in Middlesbrough in the 70's and going to school in short trousers, making slides on the ice on the pavement and in the playground though. It seemed in those days like winter lasted for 3 months, one year there was enough snow to make an igloo in our road! Happy days!

  7. Anyone remember Jan 1987? Got sent home from work early, parked the car and didn't move it for a week! Tried to walk up Titsey Hill from Oxted with the intent of poly bagging down the North Downs, but only got as far as the M25 and was in thigh deep drifts. Tatsfield, near Biggin Hill was cut off, the pub ran out of beer and a pregnant woman had to be airlifted to hospital. There was a photo of the bus stop on the ridge totally covered with only the top of the sign sticking out. Drifts must have been 8ft at least!

×
×
  • Create New...