Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Spikey M

Members
  • Posts

    389
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Spikey M

  1. Just now, Paul said:

    I agree that the matrix is an important part of the warnings. But, I'm wondering whether you're more highlighting an issue in the communication of the warnings and the matrix system itself, more than anything else. I mean, if so many people aren't reading the warnings properly and potentially misunderstanding them, is it their fault or the warning's fault?

    A warning ought to be as crystal clear as possible from the headline really, if you need to delve into the inner workings to see what's going on, I'm not sure that's ideal. 

    Not Meto bashing by the way, as it's a difficult thing to get right, but the one thing a warning system ought not to be (imo) is confusing. 

    Absolutely. And it feels like it should be relatively simple to achieve. Either by having the matrix front and centre with the map, or by displaying likelihood as a percentage within the map. You have to wonder why they haven't. It must have occurred to them.

    • Like 2
  2. 1 minute ago, kate1 said:

    I think the issue is that we get so many yellow warnings now people pretty much ignore them. If an amber warning can encourage people to take the weather seriously - securing things like trampolines which are likely to cause a hazard, doing any emergency home maintenance which might avoid serious damage, and most importantly keeping themselves safe - then surely that can only be a good thing. Admittedly here in my corner of Kent we have seen more damage and disruption in recent years under some yellow warnings than we did under last night's amber, but that's not something that can always be predicted in advance and in this case all the indications were that this could well be an extremely nasty storm for most of the UK.  The MetOffice have to be cautious where people's lives and homes are potentially at risk.

    The problem is people don't take the time to understand the warnings. They just look at the map and see they are under a yellow, amber or red warning and they think:

    Yellow: it's going to be windy.

    Amber: it's going to be REALLY windy 

    Red: airborne cottages. 

    But that isn't the case, the colour addresses 2 factors. Danger and LIKELIHOOD. The likelihood always seems to be overlooked. A yellow can mean either "we are confident that it's going to be windy" OR "there's a 0.01% chance of the strongest storm in history on thursday".

    Until people stop to look at the matrix, they are going to keep accusing the Met of getting it wrong. Even when they haven't.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  3. 1 hour ago, Alderc 2.0 said:

    Completely disagree, your statement is too broad, the storm was not severe for a large part of the heavily populated south where the amber was never needed and never should have been issued, not just my or my next door neighbours back garden. 
     

    Further north conditions just about warranted the Amber warning, but I’ve still seen very few (I don’t think there were any) official gusts over 75mph for lowland stations away from exposed coasts. Clearly aviation and ferries where affected along with the trains but again this all very temporary and especially on train front their striking staff cause far more disruption than any weather event we’ve seen recently 

    I maintain my position too many warnings are issued full stop and like yesterday they are often too aggressively worded and too widespread. Fortunately we have very few true life  threatening meteorological events in the UK however the number of warning suggests otherwise i maintain that a ‘cry wolf’ situation is in the making where people just won’t prepare for when something truly impactful and devastating comes along. 

     

    And this is why people should pay more attention to the risk matrix, rather than just the warning map. The risk was substantial, the likelihood was not. People claiming "crying wolf" usually just haven't looked.

    • Like 7
  4. 8 minutes ago, MAF said:

    are you not even allowed to put 'secondary' windows in? basically a window in front of the building's windows on the inside. some planning rules are quite archaic. even where i live in SE London there are restrictions to what householders can do to their property. after all 'their property' is the operative words

    I'm not sure to be honest, certainly something to look into though. Thank you.

  5. I am very much ready for the end of this cold snap. I love living in my rickety old cottage, but we are in a conservation area and stuck with single pane windows at the front to "uphold the character of the area". This is the first real cold snap since we moved here in 2022, and having icicles INSIDE the windows has been... interesting.

    That said, the storm on Sunday/Monday looks like another strong'n, and we could without forking out for yet more fence panels!

    • Like 2
    • Insightful 1
×
×
  • Create New...