Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

snowfluff

Members
  • Posts

    141
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by snowfluff

  1. The full blocking pattern that will eventually introduce the real cold is still to setup Biggin.

    Just for fun if you look in the T240 ECM you can see the colder uppers over Scandinavia and E.Europe.

    post-2026-0-60589000-1353360818_thumb.pn

    in the days following with a flow from north of east they would come this way.

    As we keep saying get the blocking established in the right areas then the cold will come.

    Remember Arctic cold doesn`t belong here in the UK it has to be brought in and for that we have to give the new pattern chance to turn the winds into the right direction and transport that colder air..

    Wrt to your last point the team are monitoring off topic/undesirable posts and will take action if necessary but anyone can press the report button if by chance the odd one slips through.

    Thanks for the advice phil

  2. I think I get you! It is kind of what I alluded to with the refreeze now starting at a higher latitude than before. More new cold high latitude space for the ice to refreeze, as well as the same places where the refreeze has always occurred in Autumn, which allows for more ice to form during Autumn than in previous years.

    I guess we'll be in real trouble when the ocean warmth gets to such a level that it begins to slow that refreeze

    What do you think will happen if we get into real trouble re refreeze?

  3. I guess there are a also a lot of new or inexperienced drivers who haven't driven in really snowy conditions and either slide to a stop blocking the road or worse. From my own point of view, I make less progress in my modern electronically stabilised and assisted car than I did in my old Mini's 30 years ago!. I end up turning off traction control ESS etc and try to regain control of the car from the computers just to make sensible forward progress, as modern vehicles (non 4WD) seem to want to just bring you to a halt in anything other than perfect conditions.

    Yes i agree wrt drivers etc,as others have said though, you can be sued if someone slips on your pile of snowcrazy.gif , its got to the point now where schools close because of 1 inch of snow,just incase a child slips on the schools snow? or outside the school gates?smiliz58.gif

  4. But the very reason they are able to deal with such events is that they can be pretty sure they are going to happen and can justify the expense of putting all the necessary equipment, resources and staff in place. If you were in charge of a cash strapped council (as many these days are) or a UK airport, would you order £millions of new vehicles, training and salt etc + sanction the staff to carry out the work if you were less than 50% sure it would happen this Winter or any other Winter, a little bit or a lot?

    It's a tough call when we have such variable weather in this country and can't be compared to other, more cold and snowy places.

    All very true, but is does seem odd that a dusting of snow is able to almost shut the country down,to the annoyance of people here, and great amusement to those folk watching from Canada,Russia, etc,etc

  5. Not sure how to put this, but would less ice(locked up water vapour)increase water vapour levels,thus increasing global temps,leading to more ice loss leading to........

    2,4,8.... If you see what i mean?unsure.png

  6. Nothing very scientific in this but i have a good feeling, No Nina this year and just have a gut feeling, something just tells me, im not saying a bitter winter overall but i just have a feeling for a really big snow event.

    Nothing wrong with a"gut feeling", probably as accurate as any LRF currently on the net or elsewhere.

  7. Yes. there was an answer from BFTV and myself a few posts ago and the separate extra rules for this part of the climate forum are here. http://forum.netweat...ion=rules&f=105

    These rules are enforced rigidly.

    Thanks for the reply, but still cant see where it says in the rules that you "must provide a link to reseach,papers etc"

    Yor refered to a post by BFTV, When he said" perceived UNWRITTEN set of rules"

    Are we govened by the written rules, or the ones that someone can perceive?

  8. Sorry am a bit confused here, having just read the "Important points prior to posting in this part of the forum" i could not find where it says" you must provide a link to research,papers/and websites that support their take on climate change"

    ?

    Many thanks.

    Sorry , any chance of an answer ?

  9. This is where some people get it wrong. This is an open forum for everyone to voice an opinion and express their views provided they can provide a link to research, papers, and websites that support their take on climate change.

    As many of our long time posters will verify, we don't accept personal opinion without the link to something regarded as proof.

    Many thanks.

    Sorry am a bit confused here, having just read the "Important points prior to posting in this part of the forum" i could not find where it says" you must provide a link to research,papers/and websites that support their take on climate change"

    ?

    Many thanks.

  10. Many people also found it hard to believe that 'we' were responsible for the ozone hole!

    My answer to this general point is always to consider some of the other impacts we've had on the planet - replacing forests by monocultures of plants that suit us, damming rivers to create new lakes, (probably) causing the extinction of many species of megafauna - and the fact the we now live in what are mostly artificially engineered surroundings. When you think about some of these impacts and then the fact that we are measurably altering the composition of the atmosphere, it's not so difficult to imagine that we might also, ultimately, be responsible for the decline in the sea ice.

    Also, because something has happened before, it doesn't necessarily mean that when it happens again the cause is the same!

    Yes i remember the ozone hole thing,we were making it bigger and bigger by using spray on tans or oven cleaners, or being a fan of Chelsea Football Club.

  11. OK at least i know what you were thinking.If you had said that in your earlier post then it would have saved me asking.

    WRT predictions on weather patterns then it`s certainly becoming a hot topic as we are in a new situation with the lowest Summer Ice levels recorded in recent times and i think the Met are simply putting some ideas out there.

    There`s no doubt about Arctic Warming and at some point the changing differences in the thermal gradients between the Arctic and latitudes further South may well impact on Hemispheric Upper air patterns.

    yes sorry about that.

    But this is where the public lose interest in GW , when the METO make such sweeping and wrong predictions, also the METO had at their disposal, at the time the biggest,best super computer which at the time obviously failed to link continued ice loss to changing differences in the thermal gradiant, and at that time gave the wrong prediction.

  12. Come on then share the joke.

    I must be missing something.

    10 years ago the MET OFFICE told US, because of global warming we will have hotter, dryer summers,and milder wetter winters(with the ice declining at this point)

    Now we get from the MET OFFICE, because of the lack of ice we may get colder winters and wetter summers, i await their next prediction.................

×
×
  • Create New...