I reckon 'combination' is the right word. The (quite intuitive I think) premise is that multi-year ice tends to be thicker on average than single-year ice, therefore less multi-year ice equals thinner ice overall and so a smaller minimum extent is more likely. Questions that would be very useful to have answers for. At maximum extent: What is the average thickness of single year ice? What is the average thickness of two year old ice? three? four? And importantly what is the variance of all these? At the point of maximum extent you might find two-year old ice at the edge of last year's min extent is only 2% thinner than neighboring one-year old ice. Maybe ice thickness has a more significant relationship with "distance from last year's min extent boundary" than with it's age. I dunno, this might be completely wrong. I could spend a lot of time hunting all this down, but experts who have done this already have concluded the single-year, multi-year difference is significant so I will stick with that.