Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Solar Cycles

Members
  • Posts

    1,148
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Solar Cycles

  1. Apologies Iceberg, I got rather carried away and went off on one!
  2. But they are not responsible for melting Arctic sea ice. There is no proof that warmer currents are linked to rises in CO2, as there is no proof that the equivalent air temperature is effected by CO2. Only lab results and computer models show this, but where it counts in the real world, scientist still can't put 2+2 together.
  3. All this scaremongering about what may happen, is bordering on the ridiculous. Arctic sea ice as, is, and will continue to grow and decline.There are far more pressing matters in the world to address right now, other than this.One thing I will add, and that how can warmer air temperatures heat up vast oceans to the point of melting Arctic sea ice. IMPOSSIBLE!!!!
  4. Hathway seems confident that it will be the end of the year! Then again, he was confident a few months back. Me thinks it will be some time soooooooooon!
  5. Exactly Jethro, but that tiny little fact seems to count for nothing, when one as an agenda!
  6. Sorry but anything Richard Black says I would take with a huge dose of salt. The man is a scaremongering alarmist, who loves to present worst case scenarios with very dubious data!
  7. Good point! There is so much we don't know about our oceans, and the simple fact is we don't know for sure why our oceans have warmed. Possibly Volcanoes under the oceans could have a big part to play, but again we don't really know to what extent underwater volcanic activity as on ocean temperatures. All speculative at the moment, maybe NASA should be looking to explore the oceans as well as space!
  8. Sorry Ossie, it was early in the morning when I posted ( not at my best then ). As to your query, well no one can deny the planet as warmed recently, as to what as caused this, well I don't buy the AGW theory and I am a big believer in Natural causes much the same as Roger. I really don't buy into the conspiracy theories though, but maybe scientist embroider things a little, but you could also say the same for skeptics too!
  9. First off I never implied there was no correlation between warmer waters and there impact on hurricanes, there is! Secondly, where have I mentioned anywhere that I think it's all a conspiracy, nowhere! I was just pointing out that there is no evidence linking AGW to hurricanes, and if you can find one then by all means post it!!! :lol:
  10. Sorry but have major problems with links, computer not wanting to play! But if you look up an article from the 22nd February 2008 on NOAA/ news stories, then hopefully you can find it. As I say though there is no evidence to support a link between AGW and hurricanes, and any climate scientist will state the same!
  11. Im sorry GW but if you can't be bothered to look up the links I provided, then please leave the sermon for another day. Thank you!! :lol:
  12. Sorry having problems at the moment trying to get links. However if you go on the NOAA'S own site there is a nice quote there. "There is nothing in the US hurricane damage record, that indicates global warming has caused a significant increase in destruction along the US coast". And if you can take a look at the Tropical Cyclone ACE 1980-2008 graph, then you will see further proof as to there being no link between AGW and hurricanes! :lol:
  13. Well GW I would put my house on the line, that there is no link between Hurricanes and AGW. Ask any climate scientist worth his salt, and he will tell you much the same these days. Probably something to do with the scaremongering tactics that where deployed a few years ago, informing us all how Hurricanes will intensify in numbers and severity!
  14. And what does this all prove? Certainly not AGW is responsible, there is no evidence what so ever to prove there is a link!
  15. What a pity I missed it, I mean the great man himself there for all to hear! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
  16. So that's 8 Hurricanes GW and 3 of those under a category 3?
  17. I'm sorry GW but I can't see the point in this thread, for all your scaremongering, this year as been a relatively quiet Hurricane season. How many Hurricanes where there exactly?
  18. I think any professional meteorologist would be wise to keep their personal beliefs to themselves regarding AGW. As voicing ones dissent would be frowned upon by the powers that be!
  19. Excellent post Roger, far to much scaremongering going on with very little in the way of actual evidence. GW maybe you can answer this question. Why is there no greenhouse signature above the tropics, after all that's where it should be but no weather balloons can find this signature?
  20. Yes your right there! So maybe we should extend that theory for 20-30 years, after all that is also a very short time span!
  21. Just for once Devonian, try no to look at this from your wamist point of view. Yes the data is flawed, the question being asked is how the hell did GISS allow such a simple error pass them by!
×
×
  • Create New...