Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Nick F

Senior forecaster
  • Posts

    9,892
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    18

Posts posted by Nick F

  1. 30 minutes ago, Fiona Robertson said:

    Someone mentioned earlier that the still mushrooming cloud tops near the centre increased the chances of a sting jet. I can't rememeber who it was. Can anyone help here re sting jet possibilities?

    With regards to a sting jet, normally they tend to form in the early stages of rapid cyclogenesis (RACY) of a mid-latitude depression, this may occur with extratropical Ophelia well before landfall over Ireland, as by the time it reaches Ireland it will already be weakening. However, downward momentum of stronger winds aloft in embedded convection, likely impressive dry air intrusion wrapping into the low also aiding in downward momentum of strong low level jet just over on the cold side of the cold front will certainly produce some sting jet-like powerful and damaging gusts.

    • Like 4
  2. 13 minutes ago, JeffC said:

    Is the water she's tracking over now too cold for EWRC? Or could that happen again?

    Unlikely, as passing over cooler and cooler water plus dry air (see WV image below) and cold front encroaching from the west (see fax) will tend to elongate and break up the circulation of convection around the centre of the hurricane. So eye wall will eventually fill in today IMO.

     

    seviri_eurnat_wv6-2_20171015_0700.jpg

    PPVA89.gif

    • Like 3
  3. 15 minutes ago, OPHELIA said:

    Can I take this moment to say and not contradicting your post but storms like this do intend to stay out in the ocean because that is what they feed from, it's as they say for every action there is a reaction :). This could in turn keep some form of strength for a little while, but I'm not counting on it. 

    By the time Ophelia reaches Ireland waters it will be extratropical meaning that it derives most of its energy from horizontal temperature contrasts of Polar and Tropical air masses along baroclinic zones i.e. Cold/warm fronts and occluded fronts. The large scale ascent of air at the surface created by divergence aloft by left exits and right entrances of jet streaks which the depression moves into helping to deepen the low if they phase favourably. 

    Whereas true hurricanes derive energy from warm sea temperatures above 26C, certainly the seas around Ireland won't be the main source of energy

    5 minutes ago, karlos1983 said:

    @Nick F if “hypothetically” you were going to pick a spot in Ireland for landfall, where would you go... no pressure like  

    Most likely over the western side of County Kerry. 

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  4. 8 minutes ago, January Snowstorm said:

    Hi Nick F 

    Bearing in mind Cork is low lying and Irelands second city is a red warning warranted in your opinion?

    I'm not expert on oceanography, but certainly think there will be impacts of such a high swell entering Cork Harbour on a high tide being funnelled into bays and as far as the the city itself and causing tidal flooding low lying areas, particularly given the strong onshore winds and waves likely from the south.

     

    • Like 2
  5. 00z EC and UKMO still appear to be tracking ex-Ophelia up far western side of Ireland, hard to tell if landfall given 12hr positions, but ECMWF will update on Icelandic weather service in 6hr positions around 8am, so will find out then.

     

    ECMOPEU00_96_1.png

    UKMOPEU00_96_1.png

    Fortunately, the depression looks to fill quickly as it passes over far west of Ireland.

  6. The unusually active hurricane season seems to be not going out with a whimper, as Ophelia now being a cat. 2 storm makes it the strongest an Atlantic hurricane that has been this far east (35.5°W) this late in calendar year on record.

    18z still keeping Ophelia well west of Ireland, the 12z European models (UKMET-G, ECMWF and ARPEGE) tracking Ophelia over Ireland, be interesting if the Euros back west in the morning runs!

    Have updated my blog recently which is tracking Ophelia: 

    https://www.netweather.tv/weather-forecasts/news/8492-tracking-hurricane-ophelia-heading-our-way-as-an-ex-tropical-storm

    • Like 3
  7. 4 minutes ago, crimsone said:

    Wasn't the storm of 87 an entirely mid-latitude cyclone affair born in Biscay, though? It seems pretty settled in my mind that 87's Great Storm wasn't an ex-hurricane at all?

    Yep, think you're right, it developed over Bay of Biscay rather than an ex-hurricane reintensifying, nonetheless still weird Ophelia makes potential landfall on the exact date of the 30th anniversary

    • Like 3
  8. Michael Fish on the BBC news this evening and I still remember well the night of the Great Storm of '87 coming to our village in Kent, even though 30 years have passed, it was kind of burnt in the brain for life, as did the Burns Day Storm of 1990 and January 1987 snowstorm. Wow, wasn't '87 an exciting year for weather? Anyway, kind of eerie that another ex-hurricane like the Great Storm comes a-knocking exactly on the 30th anniversary, though probably not a UK landfall as it stands for now. 

    But, nonetheless, seems surreal too that the NHC have a wind cone aimed at the British Isles

     

    • Like 6
  9. Ophelia now a hurricane, change of title needed ...

    000
    WTNT42 KNHC 112031
    TCDAT2

    Hurricane Ophelia Discussion Number  11
    NWS National Hurricane Center Miami FL       AL172017
    500 PM AST Wed Oct 11 2017

    Intensity estimates for Ophelia still range wildly.  Dvorak
    estimates, both subjective and objective, continue to support a much
    higher intensity than other satellite-derived maximum wind
    estimates.  Adding to the uncertainty, subjective Dvorak
    classifications at 1800 UTC were higher than 6 hours prior, but
    since that time, the ragged eye has become obscured in IR imagery.
    However, a recent SSMIS pass at 1813 UTC indicated that the
    convective structure of the cyclone has improved during the day, so
    it wouldn't be surprising if the eye became apparent again shortly.
    In an attempt to blend all available data, the initial intensity has
    been increased to 65 kt, making Ophelia a hurricane. However, it
    should be stressed that the uncertainty of the initial intensity is
    higher than normal.

    The hurricane is moving slowly toward the east and the initial
    motion estimate is 090/3 kt.  The hurricane is embedded within weak
    steering flow, and only a slow northeastward drift is expected for
    the next 24 h.  After that time, an approaching deep-layer trough
    should force Ophelia to accelerate toward the northeast.  All of the
    deterministic models are in fairly good agreement on the speed and
    track of Ophelia, however the various model ensembles suggest that
    the uncertainty is much higher, especially regarding the forward
    speed of Ophelia beyond 48 h.  The official track forecast favors
    the deterministic model solutions, in part to maintain continuity
    with the previous advisory.  The track forecast is therefore close
    to the multi-model consensus, but much faster than the various
    ensemble mean aids.

    Since it isn't clear exactly how strong Ophelia is, the intensity
    forecast is low confidence.  All of the intensity guidance indicates
    that strengthening is likely for the next 24 to 36 hours, however
    the near stationary motion of the hurricane could induce some
    upwelling and limit the extent to which the hurricane may
    strengthen.  Around 72 hours, the shear should begin to increase
    substantially as Ophelia begins to interact with the approaching
    trough, and extratropical transition will likely begin, accompanied
    by a broadening of the wind field and a gradual decrease of the
    maximum winds.  The global models indicate that this process will
    complete by 96 h.  The new NHC intensity forecast is slightly higher
    than the previous forecast, but lies on the lower end of the
    intensity guidance for the first 72 h.  It is near the consensus
    aids thereafter.

     

    • Thanks 1
  10. 1 minute ago, Froze were the Days said:

    Nice read there Nick for Laymans like myself :) - I think it could be 4 winters though! 2013/14, 2014/15, 2015/16 and last winter have all been poor or relatively poor...

    Actually, I think you're right, it probably was 4 mild winters on the run, was thinking 2013 had some cold, but that was early on in the year thinking more about it, Jan-April that year were below par.

×
×
  • Create New...