Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Tamara

Members
  • Posts

    3,366
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    45

Posts posted by Tamara

  1. 11 hours ago, TSNWK said:

    In my view you can have as many global teleconnections theories  as you like  (they tend to come in fads  until proven wrong )  but the simple fact of the  matter is the chaos and  butterfly effect that increasingly extrapolates its own merry dance the further out we look..  an elephant fart in Thailand could introduce the butterfly effect that along with random chaos of the atmospheres scuppers any teleconnections theory beyond around 3 weeks in my humble opinion. Personally I do find the 500mb charts broadly there for two weeks out with detail following within that framework far more often than not.

    My last reiteration on this as I accept that no amount of rationale is going to be worthwhile when disillusion with the weather in the UK overrides any reasoning behind it.

    There is no "theory". And there is certainly no "fad". That is, frankly, unwarranted trivialisation.  These atmospheric drivers in the tropics and extra tropics are steeped in empirical science of the atmosphere & the physics of the turning force of the jet stream through angular momentum processes. All put together into a diagnostic framework.

    There is nothing wrong with the science,. What can go wrong is natural human error in decoding the complexities from time to time - but that doesn't make the teleconnection tools related to the science themselves wrong or of little use.  As much as it doesn't make the 500mb charts wrong at any given time, irrespective of the fact that they may change in their outlook subsequently according to the diagnostic that drives then and there can equally be human error with these. The point is that they attempt to model the diagnostic processes that are in never ending flux - and such flux constantly evolves the outlook. The 500mb charts are the best overview of numerical overview interpretation. There is no disputing that. However, as stated, these evolve & change as much as NWP evolves & changes its outlook according to its interpretation of the diagnostics that drive them.

    The reasoning for the changes this July have been stated umpteen times. it is not the teleconnections that are to blame for departure from expectations (in the UK). And neither is the present situation to do with any butterfly or random effects. It is a natural cyclical ebb in the state of the atmosphere that has produced a pronounced disconnect much greater than was anticipated.  Nothing more, nothing less.

    Finally, and with that in mind, ownership has to be taken for the fact that the focus of the downturn happens to be in the vicinity of the focus of a UK weather forum. Better to accept the reality of that disappointment, and own the disappointment - than blame the science, or the tools used based on the science.

    Whatever the weather, hope as many of you can enjoy the remainder of the summer.

     


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/99056-model-output-discussion-mid-summer-onwards/?do=findComment&comment=4889208
    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1
  2. 11 minutes ago, Downburst said:

    My thought on this. The AAM is a computational measure, measuring angular momentum of the atmosphere with predictions into the future from a starting point of data. The NWP models we generally look at are the same, with initial conditions. There is no lag in the NWP compared to an index of AAM. The 500 charts presented this morning are as good as you might find in predicting the weather. the predictive chart you show for AAM is just that and in my view there is no lag as such, initial conditions are just that for any predictive system with respect to weather. If this AAM was able to over ride ECM or NOAA or MET Office general output data,  I think the scientists in there had better get to work chasing up these charts. 

    Summary, don't expect the weather you want because world wide AAM rises, you may as well expect the weather you don't want BTW.

    Modelling forecasts from ECM, as a quality example, in respect of AAM will give some insight into the numerical models synoptic outlook.  More reliable in respect of initiation data etc than the CFS vs 2 AAM forecast on that mapwall site. However, if the numerical models (including ECM)  are blindsided by the strength of an existing diagnostic signal this can, and sometimes does, create errors in extrapolating the length of that signal forward. This is the essence of the posts being made of late in terms of trying to urge caution in too much fixation with extended NWP.

    With all that in mind, its worth looking again at the actual consolidated GSDM data to try to get some clues as to the longevity of the AAM lull and how it is possible that some blindsiding may increasingly likely to be in operation.

    As posted a few times, large amounts of surplus westerly winds ( Nino-esque inertia) have been scrubbed from the extra tropical circulation. These surplus +AAM windflow anomalies ensured the downstream ridging of the first part of the summer. Sub seasonal effects such as the Indian monsoon are now scrambling the low frequency Nino ENSO signal & feedbacks are emanating from a more Nina-esque background in the absence of high frequency forcing in the Pacific which drove the early part of the summer.

    The periodicity of the -ve MT is predicated on largescale retrograde effects in both tropical and extra tropical mountain torques. Total aggregate MT in both tropics & extra tropics has fallen this week to -ve 3 standard deviations (from parity). The -ve inertia is identified by the circled anomaly on the plot and the reflected arrowed aggregate STD drop. (There is also -ve inertia corresponded in the SH c/o South America Andes -ve MT processes)

     

    MTink.thumb.GIF.2a14a16aea49a825d93478e0c3e4fe08.GIF

    Based on the increasingly El Nino-esque base state, a very large disconnect is in process and consequently a very unstable GSDM profile - with the Global Wind Oscillation advertising this disconnect orbiting through GWO Phase 1 which is a La Nina attractor phase. 

    Ergo, the atmospheric circulation is acting "destructively" (currently) on the ocean base state c/o this disconnect.

    InkGWO.thumb.GIF.72887924d7a27b7e6d78b6cc8a2f2844.GIF

    The retrograde -ve inertia phase (easterly) is proving increasingly prolonged. The -ve MT periodicity, as mentioned above, relates to lag timescales of up to 12 days from when westerly winds start to be re-added in the tropics (c/o high frequency MJO/CCKW activity). These initial westerly wind additions are represented by frictional torque momentum (i,e a surface flow inflection convergence point created where these re-added westerly winds meet the easterly inertia that the -ve torqe processes had dumped into the atmospheric circulation)

    New WWB additions added can be seen on the equatorial scale of the FT plot. Over time, these propagate through the tropics into the extra tropics

    FTink.thumb.GIF.a82f18407966a1613b55f5f14302e1bc.GIF

     

    Consolidated GSDM data lags by about 2 days. There are signs of an uptick just beginning in the re-addition of WWB's as the next tropical convection cycle propagates eastwards though the tropics. This signal requires a few days monitoring for persistence - hence the suggestion to not jump on each and every day intra day modelling suite - especially based on the lagged periodicity for the existing -ve MT effects to be eradicated from the extra tropical circulation (ahead of the propagation of renewed WWB's)

    From all this, it is possible to see how numerical models might be too blindsided by the strength of the prevailing signal (and its periodicity timescale) However, in the outlook period at some stage the numerical models become increasingly likely to screech into reverse as they start to see what is ahead of the roadblock.

    The mantra remains that the last third of the summer may ensure a bookended season - with a seasonal disconnect as at present in the middle.


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/99056-model-output-discussion-mid-summer-onwards/?do=findComment&comment=4888563
    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    • Insightful 1
  3. 27 minutes ago, mushymanrob said:

    for what its worth, imho the response was a little ott, i didnt get anything out of your post that was anything but an honest opinion and one based on reality... LRFs are hard to get right.. BUT .. i do admire and respect those who are trying to produce them.

    (Fairly) briefly two things

    1) The comments related to the current snapshot of the middle to latter part of July - which as was explained does not really constitute an LRF within the wider discussion on this thread that had been, by some, discrediting seasonal forecasts. Such seasonal forecasts being much closer to fitting the description of an LRF. Hence it rather gave the impression that the present departure from the default pattern of the summer to date meant that seasonal LRF's were somehow wrong b/c of the present 10 to 15 day outlook.

    2) The rest of the post was a general address to the nature of some of the responses in the thread itself and not specific to the post under reply. It is possible to read the post back and see that this was actually made clear,

    There is a lot of (interesting) discussion outside of this thread about the ongoing disconnect of NWP vs the GSDM & teleconnectic outlook which is where the repeated suggestions come from that NWP is over egging the sustainability of the latest low AAM signal in the longer term. It is on that basis that the idea of sitting back and measuring this dichotomy over at least a few days might be better than jumping over each and every NWP suite each day as if to declare the "the teleconnections don't work" . This kind of situation can and clearly does take some time to resolve and in the time it does take it is possible to gather more data and update about progress and provide further answers and explanations. This is just not possible to do when that time is not allowed to gather that data as more diagnostic information comes in.. Being only at the half way point of the month and indeed summer itself it seems a sensible thing to do before jumping to conclusions. That was one of the central points in the general address and part of the frustration. 


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/99056-model-output-discussion-mid-summer-onwards/?do=findComment&comment=4888257
    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  4. 5 hours ago, Uncle_Barty said:

    July mean here so far is 17.6°c - 2020 and 2015 were both lower (17.2 and 17.1 respectively).

    2012 was a pitiful 16.2°c, dragged down by some very poor temps in the first 10 days or so. On only 4 days of that month (around the 23rd) did each day's mean exceed the July average mean temp here (17.9) since 2000.

    Whats the colour decode for the other ones, please?

     Based on a record breaking June (in UK) and the first 10 days of July actually perfectly respectable against long term temperature averages, there is a lot of excess reactivity instead of proactivity to be waded & skipped through. Considering calling time on seasonal LTF's is just as absurd (based on a good match overall so far) and extrapolating weeks ahead at a time based on face value numerical model interpretations. Signals lead models, not the other way around - and models do always read signals impeccably particularly in periods of excess of 10 to 15 days ahead. 

    The facts are repeatedly laid out as to how & why the pattern is the way it is and what will change it (and will change it) Latest GSDM updated consolidated data confirms a full volte face to a Nina-esque type of forcing, so the synoptic response should not be a surprise with such a collapse of angular momentum,

    NinaMT.thumb.GIF.3c7650f486100817f7d04efac513d8ce.GIFNinaAAM.thumb.GIF.24a96add7275a3b4d6d554b66bebb674.GIF

    As part of the broken record, one context of this is a natural lull in the mini ENSO cycle ahead of the next upswing (and associated reconfiguring of the pattern which for NW Europe means a return to more summer like weather) It just so happens that this cyclical downturn has coincided with (part) of the peak of summer. However, another context is the record breaking June that came before it & the fact that this lull phase is not long term sustainable.


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/98519-model-output-discussion-15th-march-onwards/?do=findComment&comment=4887663
    • Insightful 1
  5. 1 hour ago, MattH said:

    Morning. A general update. While the overall evolution and predictions haven't changed, we are now starting to see the process that has been long predicted, in terms of the GSDM, starting to come to fruition.

    As usual, the RMM (MJO plots) are not telling the whole story at the moment, but analysis of observed OLR (Outgoing Longwave Radiation) is finally highlighting the onset of the expected MJO activity that will help to alter the upstream, Pacific pattern in association with the usual developments and evolution as part of the GSDM, again as discussed by Tamara and others in recent weeks. Some of the key plots that stand out are as follows...

    image.thumb.png.5030f385602fae84f06c9aa148fb988b.png

    No need to get bogged down by some of the plots, but note the area of green lines across the Maritimes and W Pacific on the 09Jul23 plot, with arrows extending outwards from the middle of this region. This indicates outflow, surface convergence and upper-level divergence in association with increased organisation of convective activity. Similarly, the -ve (blue) values around 120E to 160E of note on the analysed 10Jul23 plot, while the ever-reliable EWP zonal harmonics plot, shows a similar short-term pattern and evolution with the -ve VP200 signal extended westwards over the next week or so.

    The GSDM data remains dead, for now, but I fully expect all the usual plots to kick into life over the next week, including the tendency and frictional torque plots, to name a few as we see this long-predicted pattern play out.

    image.thumb.png.6f716bb221b8071dc66879fac3467830.png

    NWP is still resolute in maintaining the NW European trough, especially recent runs of the EC Monthly, right into August, despite the above consistent AAM prediction, but I would completely bet against the cyclonic evolution lasting as long as is being suggested by the majority of NWP, at the moment. This will be yet another fascinating test of the usefulness and importance of not taking NWP at face value, but also factoring in the developments of the GSDM and how those processes, at times, can certainly lead the models and provide an alternative outcome and suggestion. In my relatively short time of studying and using the GSDM operationally for Long Range Forecast for work purposes, I have certainly seen it provide better clarity than NWP at times and with then NWP playing catchup as time progresses and I fully expect that to be the case this time around as well.

    Granted, the timing of this process has been the 'issue' this time around, but so what, that's the nature of the weather. Overall, still expect changes before month's end, it could well end up being a summer that evolves with a good start, poor middle and good end. A decent August, overall, is long-overdue, there have been some very poor ends to summers in recent years, but the upcoming AAM evolution could well tip the balance in favour of a decent spell, the perfect time for the summer holidays and after further cyclonic short-term weather would be welcomed by many as late summer quickly approaches.

    Cheers, Matt.

    This summary and the sentiments about NWP vs GSDM diagnostic is something I especially agree with based on repetition of such in so many of my own analyses.

    Clear evidence by way of consolidated GSDM data as to why we are where we are currently. Large scale upstream deceleration of wind-flow underway in the extra tropics as westerly inertia is scrubbed out of the atmospheric circulation c/o -ve mountain torque processes. Angular momentum tendency accordingly taking this cue downwards & in turn leads leads aggregate global AAM through the parity boundary to enter -ve total budget wind-flow.

    MTJul23.thumb.GIF.3e426f179c1317ca802026c632b72d9a.GIFTdAAMtend23.thumb.GIF.4e748062cfe69dd3608a58773479f2c8.GIFTAAM23.thumb.GIF.649fb0d8c390bc6dc54a5176201fe86e.GIF

    The Global Wind Oscillation, the phase plot depiction of the above data, moves accordingly through transitional Phase 8 towards La Nina forcing phase 1.

    GWO23.thumb.GIF.702264aa47fa1104382b17193f8cd5e2.GIF

    All adding up to a negative Nina-esque type interval underway as advertised by the retracted upstream pattern forging a downstream Atlantic ridge and NW Europe & Scandinavian trough.

    The looping jet between the broad-scale features creates a "sink" as it dives towards southern Europe. Good explanation here:

    This, in contrast to the relatively cool unsettled conditions on the polar side of the looping jet across NW Europe.

    All the analysis has been given as to what is required to lift out the ongoing pattern including detailed description of the eastward propagating tropical convection forcing to ultimately return westerly inertia from upstream and reconfigure the downstream jet profile in the extra tropics.

    The notion that NWP will be prone to change of tack becomes stronger and the status quo less sustainable the longer it tries to keep churning out the same old. I would not put too much purchase in extended data at present, especially that which retains the downstream trough all the way into August.


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/98519-model-output-discussion-15th-march-onwards/?do=findComment&comment=4886926
  6. 1 minute ago, Scorcher said:

    Not looking good at the moment but I'm taking comfort in the fact that it's 9 days away- and a lot can change between now and then.

    Having jumped too soon with the early to mid July pattern in respect of the tropical>extra tropical wind-flow cycle & underestimated the strength of the present lull -ve inertia cycle, the onus still remains as to "when" rather than "if" the upswing returns. 

    Not an official forecaster but am prepared to stick a neck out for the extended period in respect of a quite spectacular upswing with trough amplification in the Atlantic finally killing off the Atlantic blocking and driving a replacement trough and strong downstream ridge.

    Extended GEFS most especially & to some extent CFS tropical convection products are day by day ramping up expectations of a high amplitude tropical convection wave (CCKW related as spoken about in previous posts) to propagate eastwards to the Pacific and probably finally provide a sustained ocean>atmosphere coupling of El Nino.

    image.thumb.png.76bc73991dcb68651f1341bdc18a7a20.pngimage.thumb.png.e3c0d93598a36068f5de1be6f2c4d36e.png

     

    ECM is, presently, lower key with this suggestion, but the RMM plot tends to erroneously "lose" signal progression within the Maritime continent and subsequently fade the signal before making much inroads into the Pacific.

    Taking into account MJO periodicity of 60 to 90 days of amplitude high frequency tropical convection cycles, this event would be on the later timescale end of that envelope, based on the previous strong intraseasonal activity seen in May. So such an event, taking into account the current ENSO transition and CCKW events which progress the evolution of these, is therefore due within diminishing limits of time. Taking into account spatial warmth of SST arrangement across the Western Pacific and sub surface heat anomalies, such a CCKW has quite the hallmarks to be a significant inducer of pattern shift for the last third of the summer as strong tropical convection convergence, and associated deep thunderstorm development, becomes more coherent across the Pacific

    It would also be guaranteed to see angular momentum tendency soar with a fast reversal in the presently -ve extra tropical torque mechanisms leading to re-configuration of the jet stream and a split flow returning lower pressure to the west and south west of Europe and ridging downstream across mainland Europe into Scandinavia.

    Assuming a bone fide credence to this signal (and there is credence) then extended modelling has to accord with the diagnostic at some stage and start to blow a hole in the Atlantic ridge and dissolve the downstream trough on the way to reversing it.

    August the hottest month of the summer for NW Europe?


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/98519-model-output-discussion-15th-march-onwards/?do=findComment&comment=4886388
    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  7. 6 hours ago, Scott Ingham said:

    The chart at T-360 however gives the first glimpse into the possible pattern change @Tamara spoke of (which i agree with)

    Notice low heights draining west into the atlantic.

    Doesnt take a lot to see iberian low formations a day or 3 forward from that......

    Period 18-21st for the start of a pattern change is my call.

    This will come further into view on sunday and thats when i expect a few better operational runs and ensemble scatter appearing.

    Yes, It could well be🙂 Much tied into the following discussion and the timing of the mechanisms required to do so. This timing, much as people like @MattH fairly recently mentioned might be the case, is proving very problematic.

     Respectful genuine enquiries are welcomed, very much including when curveballs occur, and are helpful for all concerned🙂  Curveballs always provide new learning opportunities for all with (genuine) interest💁‍♀️ A question therefore related to an incorrect assertion of the NW European trough not being as as short lived as suggested, indeed readily admitting very much expected to be short lived, is a very reasonable one.

    Much of the emphasis about an Atlantic trough and downstream ridge related to the switch on the doorstep this weekend. And this has largely verified as suggested at intervals since the last third of June. This synoptic passage largely has been at the behest of short term "mini ENSO cycle" tropical>extra tropical cycling of westerly inertia to keep re-cycling June's (mostly) default pattern into July. There has been remarkable forcing from high frequency tropical convection injecting westerly wind burst inertia into the extra tropics since the Spring and the persistent anticyclonic wave breaking that has resulted. The record breaking June in the UK didn't happen for nothing after all...

    The anticipation of this re-cycling continuing through the heart of the summer, and, in fact, impacting even more strongly the synoptic pattern downstream across many central and NW parts of Europe has been (and still is) predicated on a meaningful shift of low frequency tropical convection cementing a more permanent Nino-esque ocean-atmosphere feedback. The timing of this has clearly proved much more problematic across the board in respect of longer range predications with diagnostic modelling (which determines numerical modelling) pointing to this sooner rather than later, Hence quite reasonable not to have expected any trough related solution across NW Europe to be prolonged.  These particular summaries are also not UK centric & take into account macro regional synoptics, (including interests closer to home in Portugal)

    At present there are complex low frequency convergence signals across the Pacific, Atlantic and African continent which are scrambling the wind-flow (jetstream) feedbacks and meaning that there is no fluid inertia across the Pacific and stubborn trade wind effects are impeding the progress, currently, of Nino feedbacks in the Pacific.

    This means that split flow from upstream to downstream, introducing a more sustained sub tropical element of flow ( such sub tropical flow as was seen under the strong high frequency MJO driven forcing back in June) is not materialising as anticipated (yet). This delayed absence allows a retracted Atlantic/Azores ridge to retain stubborn strength and with a looped jet flow above and around a +NAO signature. The trough therefore sustained longer than expected. It is true in this respect that the extraordinary Maritime heat is not helping with the fuel provided for these disturbances and self perpetuating their longevity.

    The lull in the high frequency signal breaking down the westerly propagation in the tropics, and in the absence of the coherent low frequency convergence appearing in the Pacific creates a decelerating forcing (-ve low level flow frictional torque on the jetstream) and setting in motion further retrograde pull on extra tropical mountain torques in the extra tropics. This now looks likely to keep extra tropical torque mechanisms suppressed over the coming 10 to 15 days based on feedback lags.

    With that in mind, the interest persists in seeing when that more "formal" atmosphere/ocean coupling occurs and puts a proper halt to this retrograde motion that is retracting the Azores ridge and keeping it stronger than expected and in turn enabling the trough to sustain ahead if it.. Change likely will happen when the next CCKW (convectively coupled kelvin wave) drives both oceanic and atmospheric shift to couple El Nino sustainably and subtly alter the messy low frequency feedbacks to a more cohesive Pacific convergence zone. This development removes trade wind blocks at, and east of the dateline. These trade winds shut the door on the jet stream being able to straddle the Equatorial Pacific into the Equatorial Atlantic and so not being able to weaken the Atlantic/Azores ridging - much as often discussed in earlier summaries in late Spring and early summer when MJO driven forcing enabled sub tropical flow in a classic El Nino synoptic response

    A shift in the displaced Azores heights will be equally welcome down here in reducing build up of stagnant heat. This, rather that cyclical more mobile plume like heat building from south to north (and then repeating) which has been defined as the more likely default for the summer. Based on the above analysis, it still remains the case this is likely to happen & despite errors in recent estimations. The question remains the timing - and it is sensible to wait on this for the time being. NWP is not going to read such a signal especially well - so rules about baseless extrapolations of numerical model output still hold true, even at times when Mother Nature has just thrown a curveball. 

     

     

     

     

     


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/98519-model-output-discussion-15th-march-onwards/?do=findComment&comment=4883151
    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  8. Based in Portugal the concern is about ongoing intense heat levels in respect of IMBY details. But those concerns are not for this thread.

    A bit of a broken record I know, but the situation for UK/NW Europe continues to revolve around interplay between a re-setting Atlantic trough and downstream ridge. The expressed thought developing and recurring in these updates has been that what is most likely is a rinse and repeat cycle with high pressure ridging in following a thundery breakdown and then things settling  down a bit...and in turn followed by another slowing Atlantic trough advancing to buffer up against that ridge.  Happily increasing amounts of NWP are bearing that out -with variations around a theme and around timing of the chronology of events.

    The GEM numerical model is rather underrated by many and is often by-passed due to scrutiny of the rest of NWP (especially over scrutiny of the GFS). But it is much respected by UK METO (and indeed f.e IPMA here in Portugal) Looking through the entire members of the latest suite actually gives a very good overview to back a very interesting outlook. EPS has members with a similar progression.

    Many of the GEM solutions that place the trough close to UK/NW Europe next weekend and into the start of the following week thereafter go on to either reload amplification of the trough to the west in the Atlantic and resurrect a follow up heat plume, or, the trough warms out and is replaced by high pressure (and a trough re-setting to the west) Strikingly a common theme in quite a lot of them is the build of significant heat across large areas of Europe (and this includes into many parts of the UK)

    The precise weather implicated on any given day(s) based on any intra day model run (usually GFS) for a random bench overlooking an English Riviera sea view, or outside an amusement arcade in Skegness is better posted in the relevant echo chamber.   In honesty, if one is prepared to see past the noise of intra day operational model output (mostly again GFS) its hard to see what there is not to show at least an interest in . Especially as suggested  might be the case, the numerical models will stumble with the upcoming pattern. Notwithstanding that, extended periods of Azores High dominance have not been deemed likely this summer - with sequences of sub tropical jet flow introducing spells of changeability & instability. This is a summer that looks set to above average overall, but not long spells of settled wall to wall sunshine

    With that punctuated emphasis in mind, and to reiterate what could well happen following on from the upcoming sequences is when the hottest weather of the summer may very well show its hand from the south.....I would/will be one of the first to give advance warning of that. Much like the middle/latter part of July last year.

    7 minutes ago, Summer8906 said:

    Not in July though.

    It is the second day of the month..

    There is an infinitely much bigger picture than the one you are extrapolating forward.


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/98519-model-output-discussion-15th-march-onwards/?do=findComment&comment=4881086
  9. 2 hours ago, Eagle Eye said:

    Not as dire as everyone seems to think. 

    Sure this is transitioning to an El Nino summer but its uncoupled with the atmosphere ar the moment in terms of response between surface and atmosphere. There's still some +VE AAM response but not the type that suggests wet summers. The response remains the type to a -VE AAM setup for us when thinking long term. 

     

    This is a very typical response compared to the long term average. Generally, the driven relative AAM at our latitude tends to be slightly higher than the average though, towards the upper quartile. Likely a typical El Nino response. However, the distribution of that is where the actual typical vs atypical response ends up.

    aam_profile_current.thumb.png.f01ad5690384fee70dc800acf02453f8.png

    Forecasts do suggest later into July and the coupling occurs but that could still change.

    GWO_members_current.thumb.png.6084068f7f22337aa436a28e08843a03.png

    Generally, we are seeing +VE AAM driving an atypical response in the Atlantic. Localised -VE AAM could drive a slightly flatter pattern of the inertial response of an atypical north Atlantic flip. Though where that flatter is, is important.

    u_200.total_30.20N-30N.thumb.gif.615a251d9394054aee1507e521f1d0be.gif

    The further east the flatter, the better but there's a limit. There's very little that actually needs to be changed for the trough to become the driver for a much warmer pattern which I don't like but I know others do. It also may become a thundery pattern with that trough. I think that generally this will become more favourable the further ahead in time we go. The slow nudging of the -VE AAM into the mid-Atlantic is good because it drives it slightly further away from us. The ECM might be picking up on this response (though generally too early I think).

    ECM1-240.thumb.gif.54117005854c728b7432ac2d5b20c226.gif

    Some of these US twitter gurus tend to become too ENSO centric without considering the extra tropical Global Wind Oscillation as a benchmark of both tropical AND extra tropical wind-flow signal on the ocean ENSO evolution

    The GWO is a phase plot depiction of the wind-flow relationship between the tropics & extra tropics and as such angular momentum is driven according to whether the atmospheric circulation is either adding momentum (+AAM) or decelerating momentum(-ve AAM) between the tropics and extra tropics. 

    In respect of this diagnostic, it is a consolidated bellweather data proxy to test/analyse/gauge strength forcing of atmospheric circulation inertia on ENSO ocean state. Also, as stressed in so many of these analyses, the "mini ENSO cycle" aka MJO & relevant low frequency tropical convection cycles exercise natural ebb and flow in this relationship. It is not as linear and ENSO  " one size fits all" as some of these tweet gurus suggest. It is much more sinuous and and requires a more flexible approach

    So a very simple way to look at what is meant here is to take a look at the GWO itself. 

    Broken down into both 90 day and 40 day plots the ascendancy of newly coupling El Nino forcing from atmosphere to ocean is seen most emphatically.

    AAMJul23.thumb.GIF.0a9446724ad08e9bda057bbf32c56584.GIFJul40day23.thumb.GIF.1082a2405d4d1237258df466e113ad08.GIF

    Clearly, based on the high amplitude orbit of the GWO through the "El Nino attractor phases" 5 to 7 during May and into June, a very harmonious +ve AAM wind-flow signal has contributed a considerable effort towards coupling of the atmosphere and ocean. This very strong sequence of westerly wind bursts were generated in the tropics during Spring and have persistently propagated into the extra tropics - driving a series of wave-breaking events and associated downstream amplification in the extra tropics itself.

    The arrangement of the downstream Atlantic/European pattern during that phase has been classically Nino-esque. The eye catching significant split jet & sub tropical jet stream strength has been the subject of many analysis posts made in this time as reference to the evolution of the late Spring and early Summer downstream pattern.

    As commented a few times in various recent posts, all that is happening presently is a natural lull to that inertia cycle. A Nino-esque forcing on atmosphere will lead the ocean evolution to such a Nino SST imprint, which in turn can become self re-enforcing, but the tropics & extra tropics require being kept acting in harmony to keep a given ENSO imprint sustained. That looks set to keep happening. Some of these tweets tend to appear to look at this relationship back to front -or simply not consider the GWO imprint at all.

    With all this in mind, it is not going to take much renewed forcing of westerly inertia to further strengthen the coupling - which is only in very temporary and very tenuous "disconnect" (it is not truly disconnected at all in the true sense) due to the natural lull of the mini ENSO cycle.

    Looking ahead at a renewed GWO "Nino attractor" period of wind-flow cycling with the associated wind-flow propagation from tropics into extra tropical to inflate downstream amplification and trough/ridge pattern arrangement respectively once again.

     


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/98519-model-output-discussion-15th-march-onwards/?do=findComment&comment=4880651
    • Like 2
  10. 20 hours ago, Scorcher said:

    There's some hyperbole in here at the minute but this really takes the biscuit...

    We've had about 3 days of less settled weather and people are already comparing it to 2007/2012.

    There have been other unsettled periods in much better summers since then.

     Most of the nonsense is either reaction seeking spam or simply ridiculously overreactive and lacking in any substance and belongs either in the bin or in the one line chat threads.

    As posted previously, numerical modelling will continue to stumble erratically back to a re-set of the Atlantic trough & downstream ridge. Westerly inertia in the central Pacific will start to drive some split jet stream flow back further downstream in the extended period and a change of amplification axis promote a digging south in the Atlantic of the trough to inflate that downstream ridge and resultant advection of some significant heat. This needs watching for possible further adjustments in forthcoming modelling.


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/98519-model-output-discussion-15th-march-onwards/?do=findComment&comment=4879674
    • Like 3
  11. 56 minutes ago, plymsunshine said:

    Because things are shifted further west, southerly air drawn up by the low once again finds itself going straight over the UK and we're looking at a setup similar to the second week of June.

     

    57 minutes ago, plymsunshine said:

    00z op is very much on the warm side of the ensembles at this period, so it's wise to not consider it too much yet. What is encouraging is that quite a few members join it in being warm after around the 7th. The mean 850s and SLP improve drastically around this time:

     

    Which suggests a strong signal for improvement on the cards for the second week of July? So this more unsettled spell could be short lived after all. Far from anything being confirmed but the trend is there and it's a pretty good one!!

    This is good analysis based on this numerical model evolution & matches previous diagnostic summaries of late which suggested not getting too embroiled in the NW European trough scenario sticking around for the long term.

    Though in the extended period, the precise timing of this is less important than the trend towards it over the coming 10 to 15 days. The latter is consistent with the re-setting of the summer default pattern, which as you say, is reminiscent of what was seen from the second week of June. I would trust in this trend getting increased support in numerical modelling as a whole in the coming days. 

    From my point of view such an evolution is equally welcome as it dislodges the excess heat from the Iberian peninsula, trapped under the Atlantic/Azores ridging,  and  that surplus heat is eventually advected further north and east which in turn improves the prospects for UK/NW Europe. Less anomalously hot down here in this part of the Iberian peninsula equates to ideal outdoor summer weather as the middle daylight hours have prohibited doing much since late last week.


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/98519-model-output-discussion-15th-march-onwards/?do=findComment&comment=4878743
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...