Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Skin

Members
  • Posts

    43
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Skin

  1. Are you sure the conditions are all met? "This regionally conï¬ned temperature enhancement near 2 hPa in Figure 1 is part of an upper stratosphere and lower mesosphere disturbance that includes an unusually low-altitude stratopause near 42 km (2 hPa), a stratopause temperature in excess of 290 K (50 K above nominal conditions), a ~40 K cooling in the mesosphere near 75 km, and an undisturbed lower stratosphere [e.g.,Labitzke, 1972; von Zahn et al., 1998; Meriwether and Gerrard, 2004; Thayer and Livingston, 2008]. This thermal structure has been observed over the years and termed a “stratopause warming â€[ Duck et al., 2000; Braesicke and Langematz, 2000], "

    Yes in the study I linked shows a 15 K above normal. section 2.2 paragraph [10]
  2. One has to think that with such a prolonged torque that it would be very surprising not to have some stratospheric knock on effect. I would normally expect to see some type of increase in wave 1 activity as a result and yes we have seen some, but perhaps a bit more than this could be expected.

    Wave2 is on the increase. Maybe that's what the prolonged MT is stirring up as well.
  3. If you push your finger on a balloon and it doesn't pop and you take your finger off then the balloon will resume its former shape straight away. It appears that the vortex does this as well, but strengthens as well - especially in the cooling phase. Cirus has demonstrated this in his post above with the positive NAM response to the weak wave 1 activity. 

    Thanks. Great analogy. helps me understand better. And about the 1Hpa warming is anything to watch? looks to be downwelling at a decent rate. but i assume this is fairly normal this time of year. 

  4. Welcome Cirus and thanks - this thread is truly international!

     

    I am happy to say that your English is a lot better than my French!

     

    We may see that period of Vortex Intensification as the wave 1 activity seems to have reinforced the vortex rather than weaken it  - the end of the month forecast at 10 hPa shows the vortex to be strengthening as one would expect.

     

    Posted Imageecmwf10f240.gif

    How can wave1 reinforce vortex? i was under the impression it would help break it down. Also  I noticed warming at 1.Hpa. is that indicative of a Canadian SSW?

  5. post-12276-0-40650600-1356784922_thumb.p

    I honestly struggle to see how the stratospheric vortex will be maintained by the end of January- Brickfielder's post a while back highlighted the different scenarios, it's possible we could go through them all- propagation into the tropo-vortex would then become the crux of the analysis in the next few weeks

    `

    It's having one last laugh now, but it's about to get torn apart... whether we get lucky or not is another question, but isn't it fun watching it crumble alone?!

    BTW can we use this graphic for a blog? How should we credit it if so?

  6. post-12276-0-40650600-1356784922_thumb.p

    I honestly struggle to see how the stratospheric vortex will be maintained by the end of January- Brickfielder's post a while back highlighted the different scenarios, it's possible we could go through them all- propagation into the tropo-vortex would then become the crux of the analysis in the next few weeks

    `

    It's having one last laugh now, but it's about to get torn apart... whether we get lucky or not is another question, but isn't it fun watching it crumble alone?!

    This is a displacement SSW right? just want to make sure I am getting this right.

  7. Posted Image

    Hmm, the second GFS run to establish a secondary warming around the Greenland area. This outcome could be very helpful in shifting the odds in our favour with regards to a decent tropospheric pattern developing after the initial SSW.

    Also, a brilliant post by Steve earlier, the wealth of knowledge on here is something to behold and long may the constructive discourse continue.Posted Image

    Once a warming is identified, no day within 20 days

    of the central date can be defined as an SSW. The

    length of the interval is chosen to approximately equal

    two radiative time scales at 10 hPa (Newman and Rosenfield 1997).

    This condition prevents the algorithm from counting the same SSW twice, as the zonal

    mean zonal winds might fluctuate between westerly and

    easterly values following the onset of the warming

    http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/JCLI3996.1

    • Like 1
  8. I have been following you guys since last week. Just starting to wrap my head around this phenomenon. I read some interesting studies regarding SSWs and the frequency of them occur during Neg QBO coupled with low solar activity (minimums) and Pos QBO coupled with higher activity (maximums) since we are technically nearing maximum, but a very low SSN cycle, I would dare to say we could agree the Neg QBO proxy would work in this case. My point is, As long as the QBO hangs east, we'll continue to have more SSWs which would make me think is the driver behind global cooling. But i guess that could be a long stretch of logic, made sense in my head. lol

    http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11214-011-9797-5?LI=true#page-1

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...