Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Vorticity0123

Members
  • Posts

    414
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by Vorticity0123

  1. Seasonal forecasts are usually presented as three-month averages (like the one below). Why are seasonal forecasts not regularly provided on a monthly scale? Is this mostly related to predictability?

    I understand that forecast skill in seasonal models mostly comes from persistent boundary conditions like SST anomalies (e.g. El Niño/La Niña). However, I would expect some boundary conditions to provide more predictability and more amplified anomalies in the first two months month rather than in the third or fourth month. For instance, the relatively shallow Baltic Sea could provide a high likelihood of warm conditions in the neighboring countries in the first two months when it is anomalously warm at the initialization time. However, its predictive value can be quickly lost when it cools down quickly after a cold episode. This in contrast to La Niña, which tends to be more persistent over time. To recap, I would expect monthly forecast anomalies to have some added value, because some climate predictors only provide skill at a monthly rather than at a seasonal scale.

    Could contain: Plot, Chart, Map

  2. It's quite remarkable that up to now this year has seen a strong tendency towards ridging over Central-Southern Europe. If you look at the 500 hPa gph anoms for this year from January 1 up to November 6, the anomalous ridging over Central Europe is quite clear.

    _jannov.thumb.gif.db326673f14103a5fa4a292eee885fdb.gif

    Last month was no exception to the observed trend as shown below: (500 hPa gph anoms period Oct 1 - Nov 6).

    _octnov.thumb.gif.7458aee0f02909694110c529a44fcf22.gif
     

    What I am wondering is whether these anomalies could persist throughout the winter as well. Of course it is far too simple to assume that the observed anomalies this year imply that the winter of 2022-2023 will continue in the same way. Still, I wonder what factors like the persistence of La Niña or other tropical / extratropical forcings have led to the tendency for European ridging to occur, and whether similar forcings could result in a higher likelihood of European ridging for the upcoming winter.

    Looking at the seasonal model runs from November, you can see that most do not suggest more European ridging than average for the upcoming winter. These models should capture the tropical or extratropical forcings like La Niña well. Hence, I suspect that the hypothesis that European ridging this winter is more likely because we have observed much more ridging over Europe is more likely false than true.

    GPH analysis plots have been made using this link: https://psl.noaa.gov/data/composites/day/

    Link seasonal models:

    CLIMATE.COPERNICUS.EU

     

     

    • Like 2
  3. To get a quick idea of the 3D-structure evolution of the stratospheric polar vortex, I like to use the 'ellipse profile' plots found here. The GFS-forecast for the upcoming warming episode nicely show how the polar vortex might behave both horizontally and vertically during the next 10-15 days. Note that the plots are from Sunday 20-12, as the plots from 21-12 were not yet available.

    At first (situation 20-12), you can see the polar vortex is nicely structured - it is both vertically well-stacked and circular in shape.

    _0.thumb.png.e60058b061e7b8ea8b51e39425903ae0.png

    GFS ellipse Polar Vortex profiles from the run of 20-12, valid 20-12, 00Z

    However, at about 10 days out (30-12, see below), the vortex has become much less well-stacked, with the upper vortex centered near Siberia while the lower vortex is offset towards Russia.

    _1.thumb.png.2fc81a1788e941aa8f8f8d1e755a9172.png

    GFS ellipse Polar Vortex profiles from the run of 20-12, valid 30-12, 00Z

    The vortex elongation and distortion only increases from that point. At 14.5 days out (outside the reliable timeframe, but nice to illustrate the diagnostics), the vertical displacement of the vortex decreases a little. However, the vortex becomes much more elongated at the upper levels. Especially at 3 and 5 hPa, the vortex is far from circular. This is also nicely shown in the large aspect ratio diagnostic of the vortex at these pressure levels (see rightmost plot below).

    _2.thumb.png.4ba673df1410941095a9fd317e4864f7.png

    GFS ellipse Polar Vortex profiles from the run of 20-12, valid 03-01-2021, 00Z

    Curious to see whether the warming and resulting polar vortex distortion will result in a SSW sometime early January!

    • Like 6
    • Thanks 2
  4. At day 12, the GFS is showing the polar vortex to be displaced towards Eurasia. At the same time, this brings temperatures of around -80 degrees to Western and Northwestern Europe at 10 hPa (about 30 km altitude). From what I have read these conditions are favorable for Polar Stratospheric Clouds, so this may be something to watch for in just under two weeks if the GFS turns out to be accurately forecasting the cold stratospheric temperatures.

    psc.thumb.png.e661e158a6f7c594ccd101967e3b55e9.png

    The area highlighted shows the cold spot that could be favorable for the formation of Polar Stratospheric Clouds. Source: stratobserve.com

     

    • Like 1
  5. 16 hours ago, Recretos said:

    My new animation sequence, showing the nice wave2 pressure from GFS in late terms, which are strongly tropospheric forced, by the Alaskan and Atlantic ridges

    Interesting and cool animation - it nicely shows how the troposphere in this case is forcing the polar vortex aloft to be 'squeezed' by effects induced by two tropospheric ridges.

    The animation also made me wonder - would it be insightful to create a similar animation of the polar vortex in terms of temperature? I would expect that if you visualize the edges of the polar vortex via temperature, you should be able to see the ascent and descent of warmings that propagate from the troposphere/upper stratosphere to the mid-stratosphere or vice-versa. In other words - it could give more insight in both the horizontal and vertical development of warmings that may or may not affect the polar vortex, including its sources.

    Just to show some examples of what I am imagining - below are maps of the polar vortex at 10 hPa forecasted for 20 nov 2018 (left; with an intact vortex) and 14 feb 2018 (right; just after the SSW of 12 feb 2018). The blue line roughly delineates the line bordering the -45 degree isotherm. Arrows point towards the colder air.

    In this case I imagine that the blue line below represents one 'slice' of the edge of the polar vortex in 3D. Of course the temperature threshold could be set to any value .

     

    Afbeelding2.thumb.png.7b014e24657e3afca640bfa80b532252.pngAfbeelding1.thumb.png.90608d3a09a937d95fd33b4e8ab367ce.png

    GPH (black lines) at 10 hPa at 20-11 (left - normal polar vortex) and 14-2 (right - SSW) and temperature (colors). The blue line indicates the border of the 45-degree isotherm; the arrows point towards colder air. Charts obtained via FU Berlin.

    Any thoughts whether this would be something useful to do or not?

     

    • Like 1
  6. Not sure whether this is the right topic for this - but what has been interesting lately, is the large amout of small-scale cut-off features that are located in/passing through the subtropics. These cut-off features are evident as small southward-extending 'drops' of low heights (green colours; equivalent to upper-level troughs). For this post I will mainly focus on the Atlantic sector, because that alone is already pretty interesting to consider :)

    In the Atlantic, the cut-off lows have already been present from August onwards. These cut-off lows have been the breeding ground for several (sub-)tropical cyclones, like Debby, Ernesto, Joyce and Leslie. It is quite unusual that we see so many subtropical cyclones developing in the Atlantic from non-tropical origin. The extratropical re-intensificaiton of Lesile a few days ago was also aided by a southward-digging upper-level trough.

    Likewise, in Europe there have also been some cut-off troughs already. One of these caused a subtropical cyclone to develop in the Mediterranean (the 'Medicane') that is active as of 28-9. In the next few days, yet another cut-off low will develop in the Mediterranean with the potential to take on some subtropical characteristics (see animation below).

    ecmwf_z500_mslp_nhem_fh0-240.thumb.gif.f2c8ec18514403b0bd005ad7917dfb39.gif

    Geopotential heights animation for 10 days out from the 28-09 run from ECMWF. Source: Tropicaltidbits

    Looking at this flow pattern makes me wonder what is causing this unusual flow configuration. What I found is that we can find at least part of the answer to this puzzle in deviations from the jet stream. During August, the jet stream has been located unusually far to the north, as shown in the image below. That image shows the zonal (west-to-east) anomalies of winds at 300 hPa (8 km height) in August. At the latitutde of the UK, westerlies have been stronger than normal (implying a stronger jet). On the other hand, westerlies have been weaker than normal further south (implying a weaker jet). This corresponds to a northward displacement of the jet.

    ESRL.thumb.png.d0ff75944b1e76b4786e38c68ef50a8a.png

    Zonal (west-to-east) anomalies of winds at 300 hPa (8 km height) in August. The arrows illustrate the northward displacement of the jet stream. Source: ESRL NOAA

    The pattern observed above matches the large amount of cutoff lows well - when the jet is located far to the north, troughs often dip far to the south and become cut-off from the main flow. If the jet were to be located more to the south, cut-off lows would be less frequent.

    An interesting question is why we observe the northerly position of the jet and the large amount of cut-off lows in the Atlantic sector. Maybe this is linked to variations in the GWO? Since this pattern resembles the pattern of the summer to some extent (northerly position of the jet and +NAO), I suspect that any indicator must have been consistent already for most of the summer.

     

     

    • Like 6
  7. Since it is 'that time of the year' again, leaves are changing colour and temperatures are slowly dropping, thoughts on the upcoming winter are slowly taking shape. With the unusual QBO 'wobbles' it proves to become an interesting, maybe even a surprising, winter yet again. Judah Cohen did a nice write-up of the current state of the Arctic Oscillation and its meanings for the upcoming winter: https://www.aer.com/science-research/climate-weather/arctic-oscillation

    Winter of 2015/16 and some thoughts

    And also one looking back at our winter last year, where the bounds of predicability are being tested: http://www.aer.com/winter2016

    From the very same article:

    Quote

    One could argue that the true victor this winter is natural variability.  However I hope that it is obvious that I strongly disagree and through the blog I am trying to demonstrate to others but most importantly to myself that there is order in the seemingly chaos, we just need to see the whole picture.

    And that is what makes seasonal forecasting so interesting. Is there order in the chaos called the atmosphere? And if so, can we find it? The first answer appears to be yes: there is a Hadley cell which is a regular feature on our planet, there is a stratospheric polar vortex in winter, there should have been a regular QBO... The second question... we have found some order, but is it enough to be able to issue seasonal forecasts with skill? Probably only by understanding the system better we can answer this question.

    Stratospheric picture

    Back on topic: the stratospheric polar vortex is quickly taking shape again. At 10 hPa it is clearly there already.

    10.gif

    ECMWF analysis of the stratosphere at 10 hPa. Source: FU Berlin.

    Lowerning our view for the moment, the polar vortex at 100 hPa is rather elongated still. In fact, it nicely shows the blocking features present over Scandinavia. That one is developed all the way to the surface.

    100hPa.gifSurface.gif

    ECMWF analysis of the stratosphere at 100 hPa (left) and GFS analysis at 500 hPa and the surface (right). Sources: FU Berlin and Wetterzentrale.

     

     

     

    • Like 6
  8. 34 minutes ago, Singularity said:

    There's been enough eastward movement in the last hour to give me the impression that there is indeed a cyclonic loop of the eye taking place, which may be a precursor to a change in net movement starting within the next 12 hours or so.

    Quite interesting to see the looping motion within Matthew evolving. It could indeed be the onset of a northward turn. Would it also mean that the track of Matthew would turn out to be further to the east given the eastward looping of the eye?

    Loopingmotion.gif

    What does appear new to me is the spiral banding structure to the west of Matthew. This could indicate that shear is lessening and outflow is developing on that side of the circulation. At least it appears that Matthew is becoming healthier again. Whether this is a prelude to more intensification remains to be seen though, especially since subtle inner core dynamics are hard to forecast.

     

    Source: http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floaters/14L/14L_floater.html

  9. 10 hours ago, summer blizzard said:

    More interestingly though is the wave behind that system which has now come off Africa and been given a 20% chance of development by the NHC. The Euro does nothing with it tonight nor it's ensembles (it did develop this morning) however the GFS is going absolutely gagga for it and has developed it every run for the past few days.

    Around day 5 the wave approaches the Leewards and gets declared..

     

    Things can change pretty quickly; the ECMWF does develop the wave again in the 00Z run. Though it does so quite a bit later compared to the GFS. It definitely appears that we will be watching a potentially interesting storm in the Caribbean in the 5-10 day range. Things can change quickly, still, but the model support appears quite large.

    Day5.jpg

    Day10.jpg

    ECMWF run 24-09 00Z 5 days out (top) and 10 days out (below).

    The 00Z ECMWF runs shows the system just west of the Lesser Antilles as a weak low pressure area, and as a potent hurricane just east of Nicaragua 5 days later. Of course it is just one model calculation. Therefore, one should not believe this to be the real outcome. It only shows that the potential is there for a significant system in the Caribbean in about 5-10 days' time.

    Source: Tropicaltidbits

     

    • Like 2
  10. 10 hours ago, Nouska said:

    Still a bit further south than the models had initially suggested and there is still a bit of divergence between the GFS and ECM as a tweet from JB (Weatherbell) indicates.

     

    Much appears to be dependent on the intensity of Fiona, with a stronger system most likely ending up further north. With respect to intensity, it seems that Fiona will be having to go through a 'wall' of dry air on its west-northwestward track. As long as wind shear remains low, this air will penetrate the storm only occasionally. However, once wind shear kicks in (and according to the NHC that will happen in a couple of days) this dry air will be more easily entrained into the core of Fiona.

    Dry.jpg

    Saharan Air Layer analysis by CIMSS.

    10 hours ago, Nouska said:

    Looking better this evening now that convection has fired again.

    ir2-l.jpg

    Yes, it appears that the storm is able to sustain some convection over its center over the past few hours. It seems that dry air has not penetrated the system yet. There also appears to be a healthy amount of low level banding mainly to the north of te storm. So the circulation is reasonably well defined.

    Finally, a CIMSS MIMIC (microwave imagery) loop of yesterday nicely showed the transition from a banding pattern (see first image of this post) to something looking like a partial eyewall on its eastern flank, and finally to a lack of any inner core features. As of now, it seems that some new inner core features have developed. This should become evident once new imagery comes in.

    CIMSS MIMIC.gif

    CIMSS MIMIC satellite loop of Fiona of 17-08

    • Like 1
  11. The 2016 Atlantic hurricane season has just given birth to a new system, being tropical depression Six. The tropical cyclone is a typical Cape Verde system, developing from a tropical wave that left the coast of Africa a few days ago. Satellite imagery shows TD Six has a well-organized satellite appearance, with a comma-like cloud pattern evident.

    IR.GIF

    IR satellite image from TD Six taken around 06 UTC 17-08. Courtesy: Colostate University hurricane page

    Such a cloud pattern is rather associated with a strengthening tropical storm than a tropical depression, so it would not be surprising if this system would be declared TS Fiona on the next advisory. In fact, CIMSS ADT satellite intensity estimates are suggesting Six already has 35 knot winds.

    Another nice feature that can be seen on the image is a series of broken clouds to the northwest (upper right) of the depression. These clouds are stable stratocumulus clouds, which, as the name suggests, are indicative of dry, stable air associated with the Saharan Air Layer (SAL). Currently, the system is expected to move northwestward, or directly towards the stable and dry air. This will most likely prove to be quite a limiting factor on the future intensity of the depression. The NHC therefore only expects Six to intensify into a moderate tropical storm (with a maximum intensity of 50 knots).

    Track.gif

    NHC track forecast of TD Six as of 03:00 UTC.

    Based on the forecast track, it appears that the only land area that is a potentially threatened by the depression is Bermuda. If it were to undergo extratropical transition, it might influence the weather in Western Europe in some fashion. However, this is all too far out to be concerned with at the moment.

     

    • Like 3
  12. 12 hours ago, Nouska said:

    Signs of life ,day seven, in the MDR from tonights ECM.

    Still much chopping and changing to be expected, since this morning's ECMWF run (14-08 00Z) shows two different systems developing in a significant tropical system, The first one peaks in about 5 days:

    ECMWF_120.png

    ECMWF surface pressure and anomalies (colours) 00Z 14-08 T+120

    This system, probably only being a weak tropical depression at best, is located in the East Tropical Atlantic just to the west of the Cape Verde islands. In subsequent timeframes the system weakens while travelling northwestward.

    The second, more vigorous system, 'peaks' in 240 hours (10 days):

    ECMWF_240.png

    ECMWF surface pressure and anomalies (colours) 00Z 14-08 T+240

    Once again the low is located just to the west of the Cape Verde islands. This one could become more vigorous in this run, but unfortunately it ends in 10 days.

    Potential vs uncertainty

    Given how the most recent ECMWF differs from the previous one, one could argue that the uncertainty level is still rather high. The latest GFS (not shown here) does not develop any tropical cyclones, although it does show the first low pressure area in 5 days' time as a somewhat weaker system. Therefore, the first system will probably be there in about 5 days in some kind or shape. After that it seems to be anybody's guess. Nevertheless the potential of a tropical cyclone is definitely there in the next 10 days, Interesting times ahead.

    Charts courtesy: tropicaltidbits.

     

    • Like 2
  13. 4 hours ago, mezzacyclone said:

    97L (or "Earl" in the making) has very cold tops this morning with its better still organisation, +40kn sustained winds yet still no LLC?

     

    A WINDSAT scan of this morning (07:19 UTC) showed that 97L did not have a closed surface circulation yet. There was a sharp wind shift visible around the black line indicated in the figure below. Yet the wind shift was elongated on a NE-SW axis, and no true westerlies could be observed.

     

    Windsat.png

    WINDSAT image of 97L at 07:19 UTC 01-08

    Yet given the convection sustaining itself over the system for quite some time now, it would not surprise me if a surface circulation would have closed off and become less elongated. There is no data available as of writing, but one could argue that tropical cyclone formation is becoming more likely.

  14. After a lull of nearly one month of tropical cyclone activity, one could argue that we are on the verge of obtaining the first tropical cyclone of the 2016 North Indian tropical cyclone season. The cyclone is currently just off the east coast of India. However, owing to its large size and effects of easterly shear, it is causing a lot of precipitation over India.

    Anim_VIS.gif

    Visible satellite animation of invest 01B

    From this visible image, one would conclude that this is clearly a tropical cyclone given the rotation noted at all levels and the abundance of convection. The effects of shear can be best seen by comparing the center of rotation at low levels and the intense convection to its west. Whereas the center of rotation is lated near 13N 83E, the convection is pushed westward away from the center tards India.

    Another piece of evicence is a banding structure which can be seen on the northeastern flank of the cyclone. THis is much better observeable in microwave imagery:

    2016IO01_AMSUSR89_201605180322.GIF

    Microwave satellite image of 01B.

    Note how a curved band is located along the northern flank of the storm. The band seems to be attached all the way to the center of the storm.

    Strongest piece of evidence

    As of writing, an even stronger piece of evidence has come out, and that is that the JTWC (Joint Typhoon Warning Centre) has issued their first warning on tropical cyclone 01B. They expect the cyclone to turn northeastward and strengthen initially, after which it weakens due to cooler sea surface temperatures and probably increased vertical wind shear as the system becomes embedded in a midlatitude trough.

    Track.gif

    Track forecast for TC 01B from JTWC.

    Sources

    JTWC

    CIRA (for satellite imagery)

     

     

  15. Interestingly for friday, the GFS shows a rather strong jet stream crossing the Atlantic towards the UK. In such situations there is often a risk of disturbances rapidly deepening along the polar front into significant low pressure systems.

    Jetstream_2.png

    Jetstream forecast of the GFS as of Friday 00Z.

    In such situations storm tracks would probably aim for the UK and just north of that area if one disturbance finds a sweet spot to form in (preferably the left exit of the jet stream). The GFS shows this development to a certain extent.

    GFSfriday.gif

    Surface pressure (white) and geopotential height (colours) on Friday 00Z.

    Encircled is a disturbance that would in this case have the potential to develop into a potent low pressure area. This low pressure is by then located along the polar front (not shown here).

    28 hours later, this disturbance has developed into a significant low pressure just to the north of Scotland (once again encircled in black). The low pressure has attained a central pressure of 985 hPa here, which equals to a deepening of about 25 hPa in just 28 hours!

    GFSsaturday.gif

    Surface pressure (white) and geopotential height (colours) on Saturday 06Z.

    Given the small scale of the possible low pressure area, and the timeframe in which it would develop (4-5 days out), this low pressure area may develop in a completely different way, or not develop at all. It is just to show that the potential exists for a significant low pressure area to form. The ECMWF does not support this idea, whereas the UKMO does (but it takes a different path to get there). It will be interesting to see whether, and if so, how this strong jet stream potential will be 'used' by any disturbance along the polar front.

     

    • Like 8
  16. A wintry spell in late April - not exactly what one would expect! Many places in Western Europe have experienced wintry temperatures and even snowfall, for instance in the Netherlands people could greet a wintry landscape with snow actually settling! This caused quite some traffic jams and accidents on the road.

     

    snow.png

    Snowy landscape in the Netherlands on the 24th of April. Source: Weeronline.

    Snow did not only reach the Netherlands, but also in low-lying areas of Switzerland some snow fell, although only somewhat higher up the landscape got a wintry white colour.

    Slide of Arctic air

    The main culprit of the snow can be traced down to a slide of Arctic air which has come all the way down from areas near the North Pole. Fuelled by the relatively mild waters of the North Sea, this air becomes unstable and a lot of showers and small-scale low pressure areas spin up. Couple this with the unseasonably low temperatures and the snow is there!
     

    Eumetrain.png

    Slide of cold Arctic air envisaged by a satellite image as of 25-04 18Z. Source: Eumetrain.

    The image above nicely shows the cold air reaching all the way down into Western Europe. The red colours denote polar/arctic air which is flooding down over Europe from the north. Interestingly, though, this setup has been present for a number of days. This raises the question as to what is causing this persistent northerly airflow.

    A real traffic jam in the atmospere

    For the solution we look at a more global picture of the Northern Hemisphere in the midtroposphere. And that is not a usual one to say the least.

    GFS_Tropicaltidbits.png

    Pressure at 500 hPa and anomalies (colours) as of Monday 18Z. Source: Tropicaltidbits.

    The most clear feature that shows up here is very strong ridging (high pressure) at 500 hPa which extends all the way towards Greenland. This is a nice example of a block which has been present for quite some time now. This feature is what is kind of causing the atmosphere to be 'locked'; pressure systems do not move at all or barely in a couple of weeks. Think of it as a traffic jam in the atmosphere.

    The counterpart of the high pressure area is located over Mid-Europe, which shows itself as a persistent trough even reaching Africa. This feature is partially responsible for the cold temperatures aloft and thereby a generation of a lot of showers. But this is not where the story ends.

    GFS_Tropicaltidbits_2.png

    The same image, but now with airflow direction indicated in white. Source: Tropicaltidbits.

    The key for the cold air at low levels (and also partially at upper levels) is that between the high pressure area near Greenland, and low pressure over Scandinavia and Central-Europe, there is a deep northerly flow which starts off near Greenland and flows down all the way towards Tunesia.

    More cold to come?

    WIll the pressure situation remain locked, and will we continue to experience a brisk northerly airflow? The high pressure area near Greenland appears to be pulling away towards Russia, but this would still cause the cold to remain entrenched over Europe with also more unsettled weather to come. So one thing is for sure: the cold is going to stay around for some time still. Impressive for April to say the least! If we would only have had this in winter...

    • Like 7
  17. It is quite amazing to me how Emeraude has gone in 2 á 3 days from a tropical depression all the way up to a severe hurricane, and back down to a dishelved tropical cyclone! A satellite image from this morning shows there is not much left of the once-powerful tropical cyclone Emeraude.

    Emeraude.thumb.jpg.141e139ebfd19118889b5\

    Satellite image of TC Emeraude as of 18-03 04:30 UTC.

    In fact, judging from this satellite image, one could argue that the low level circulation center (denoted by an x, visible by the low level clouds) is about to become exposed to the northeast of the remaining convection. One could doubt whether this is really still a hurricane Over the past few hours, though, convection has rebuilt a little over the center again, so maybe Emeraude will slowly start to reorganize again.

    CIMSS satellite intensity trends nicely capture the rapid strengthening followed by almost just-as-rapid weakening.

    56ebafce6a6b3_CIMSSintensity.thumb.GIF.e

    CIMSS ADT satellite intensity estimates for Emeraude.

    What about the reasons for this weakening? The cloud pattern does not look like shear has been the main inhibiting factor, though there seems to be some northeasterly shear over the system (explaining why the convection is blown to the southwest of the system). The main reason to me appears that upwelling of cold ocean water has led to the weakening of the cyclone. This is because Emeraude has been sitting over the same ocean waters for about 24 hours now. Once it moves away to the southeast from its own cooled waters, it should be able to restrengthen again. Nevertheless, interesting to witness how quickly a cyclone can spin up, and spin down just as fast!

     

    • Like 1
  18. 14 minutes ago, Recretos said:

    Simply put, there is a disconnection, or weak coupling, together with possible stronger trop-forcing which can override the signal. The temperature has downwelled, but the heights have not responded. Pretty much what I am trying to emphasise the whole season, and which was the "theme" of this winter. The troposphere is kinda playing a game of its own, with partial coupling, but at this point in time the trop and strat are generally slowly starting to de-couple anyway. 

    You are right - upon a closer look the temperature profiles on the 100 and 10 hPa do seem to match nicely. The warming to the northeast of the pole yesterday is both evident at 10 and 100 hPa, with the same being valid for the warming in 9 days to the immediate south of the pole.

    Probably the overarching question resulting from your point (which I have heard being valid on quite a few occasions at least this winter), is: what mechanisms have caused this decoupling between the troposphere and stratosphere? If this question is to be answered, it might well explain a lot - and bring our knowledge one step higher for next winter!

    Thanks for the answer to my initial reasoning btw!

    • Like 2
  19. What I am so far struggeling to see in relation to this SSW (sudden stratospheric warming) event is what the effects are on the weather in the lower stratosphere (in terms of pressure patterns). Comparing the 100 and 10 hPa plots of the ECMWF run from  yesterday, valid for yesterday and 9 days out does not give any kind of clear relationship.

    A clear warming event aloft

    ECMWF10A12.thumb.gif.bc3ab5f878324e03d82

    10 hPa yesterday 12 UTC

    ECMWF10F240.thumb.gif.935e173946160c96fb

    10 hPa 9 days out from now

    The first image (at 10 hPa, far into the stratosphere) shows a classic wave 1 sudden stratospheric warming (correct me if I am wrong?), with the polar vortex being pushed towards the Eurasian side (wave 1 because a single 'high pressure cell' is pushing the vortex away). 10 days later, the high pressure area has caused a split in the polar vortex with one piece residing over Siberia and the other over the US.

    But what happens at the lowest part of the stratosphere?

     

    ECMWF100A100.thumb.gif.ef2738b40818a0e1d

    100 hPa (lower stratosphere) yesterday 12 UTC

    ecmwf100f240.thumb.gif.0299c7c3c61d488d9

    100 hPa 9 days from now.

    Initially the 'lower stratospheric polar vortex' seems to be mainly located over the Eurasian continent with its main center over Siberia. Yet there does not seem to be a clear sign of the 'high pressure' that pushes the vortex away to the Eurasian continent.

    10 days later, the pressure field at 100 hPa does still not agree at all with the pressure field at 10 hPa. There seems to be little in the way of ridging over the pole; only some weak ridging is present near California and near Western Europe.

    Little downwelling or own interpretation

    This all leaves me with a question - am I thinking too simply about the downwelling of the SSW (or in other words: are the pressure patterns in the stratosphere not connected in such a way), or is there really a kind of 'disconnect' between the upper and lower stratosphere? I'm curious on your thoughts about this subject matter.

     

    • Like 5
  20. 6 hours ago, Somerset Squall said:

    Latest JTWC estimates put Winston at 160kts, which, if confirmed at the 3am advisory, will make Winston the strongest South Hemisphere cyclone on record, beating Zoe (155kts) from 2002 and Monica (155kts) from 2006.

     

    1957764_10209016821917292_13695353452862

     

    Just... WOW. What a beast... Praying for safety for the islands who have been hit hard by Winston. Here's a loop (click to activate), which may well be one for the record books.

    Winston.thumb.gif.84a084a84692e26613a863

    IR-enhanced satellite loop of Winston.

     

     

    • Like 2
  21. 18 minutes ago, Somerset Squall said:

    We need to be careful with terminology here. Alex is being classified as a 60kt subtropical storm. Whilst it may look like a hurricane, it is not classified as one. Though it is a damn good looking subtropical storm I have to say!

    True, it has not yet been designated as being one by the NHC, but according to various sources it has officially already reached 75 knots. For example:

    http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/storminfo/

    Also, some more official sites are calling this a hurricane with 75 kt winds:

    http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/products/tc_realtime/storm.asp?storm_identifier=AL012016

    So this would suggest that Alex is officially also a hurricane

     

    Officially this information should be retrieveable via an ATCF document, but I am unable to find it so far.

    • Like 4
  22. So we seriously have a hurricane in the Atlantic ... in January! Just insane, the first time a hurricane has formed in January there since 1938. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1938_Atlantic_hurricane_season

     

    Alex_pic.thumb.gif.91ee62e4243e13298b9e8

    Satellite image of hurricane Alex.

    This system also has the looks of a hurricane with a very clear eye visible as well. Even though it is over waters much colder than the usual 27*C threshold often seen with tropical storms, it is a healthy-looking hurricane. However, as is often seen with such storms over cold waters, the convection is not as deep as one normally would expect. This is nicely illustrated in a DVORAK image of Alex.

    Alex_DVORAK.thumb.gif.d2a4a41c3004a32282

    Dvorak satellite image of Alex. Note the relatively shallow convection surrounding the eye.

    A good read about this system and its unusual traits can be found here: http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/unprecedented-simultaneous-january-named-storms-in-the-atlantic-and-c?MR=1

    • Like 5
×
×
  • Create New...