Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Ruben Amsterdam

Members
  • Posts

    132
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ruben Amsterdam

  1. In general today's Berlin charts do not look too bad with zonal winds clearly on the decline on 1, 10 and 30 hPa. Fluxes are strong and the strongest u-change due to EPV of the season if this verifies. 

     

    Posted Image

     

    In the mean while, we see temperatures increase.

     

    Posted Image

     

    Allthough wave-activity is decreasing in the upper stratosphere, wave-1 remains strong at 30hPa.

     

    Posted Image

     

    The 10hPa charts show a decent split and associated warmings (indicative of wave breaking?).

     

    Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image

     

     

    The only true downside is the pattern at 30 hPa. The vortex remains pinned - even after it is split- over Greenland and does not show any signs of moving elsewhere.

    Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image

    • Like 8
  2. With January almost over, and February about to start, time is running out for any serious winter attemps (last March was something exceptional, we cannot assume that month will repeat itself any time soon). A reforming vortex at this point would most likely mean the end for any true winter aspirations. Allthoug a cold snap is always a possibility, of course. The next couple of days will therefore be very interesting stratospherically.

     

    Because the last couple of GFS runs seem to differ wildy in FI (or UGKB in Dutch - after the German "UltraGlasKugelBereich"), I'm inclined to say it's anybody's game at this point. The critical point (at which the runs start to deviate wildly) appears to be around the +180hrs -- +192hrs mark now. A crucial point as +192 is where the high res. ends. Tomorrow's runs (both Berlin and GFS) will be very interesting indeed Posted Image

     

    Any news from the GEFS, Recretos?

     

    To end, todays 18z +192 chart shows a modest split at 10hPa (it splits earlier, actually). The million dollar question is: what will happen next? Gentleman, place your bets Posted Image

     

    Posted Image

    • Like 1
  3. I know nothing about the strat in order to comment on it, but I pop in here now and again and look at some posts, and it seems to me that the warmings that show up always seem to be at the end of the run, and still aren't getting any closer?! Posted Image

    Or is this just me not seeing everything as I only have a look every couple of days??

    It's not just you. Posted Image

    • Like 1
  4. GFS12z verifies! Stuff just got interesting!

    Posted Image


    Edit: ok, not as impressive as the 06z at the end, but certainly not a bad run.

    Edit edit: two ensembles (12z) made by Lars form our Belgain/Dutch forum weerwoord.be. 10 hpa zonal mean winds at 60N and 10hpa temps at 90N. I suspect the differences between operationals and members (early in the run) is due to resolution issues.

    Posted ImagePosted Image

    • Like 2
  5.  

    Posted Image

     

     

    I just love these graphs. So illustrative! Posted Image

     

    It strikes me as a rather large coincidence that GFS 06z with its downgraded/different tropospheric pattern (as opposed to previous runs) shows an excellent stratospheric run. Any major differences in terms of MT events between the 06z and 00z?

  6. With the charts showing a cold outlook all of a sudden I would just like to ask what has caused these charts to show up on the nwp especially with all the negativity about the stratosphere at the moment?thanks.

    Cold outlook? We currently have a split-like pattern in de lower stratosphere, which - in my view- is causing the Northerly high pressure areas and somewhat reduced westerlies. Or at least, allowing them to stay in place. The situation, however, is not favourable enough to support really cold patterns. One might say that the American core of the vortex is situated too far east/is too strong. The same pattern is present in the troposphere: the strong Alaskan high continously forces troughs and cold air to flow onto the Atlantic. 

     

    Posted Image

     

    In the mean while, EC still does not forecast the intense warming GFS has been showing. That said, GFS seem to downgrade the warming in the last couple of runs. 

    • Like 1
  7. The consistency in the gfs op fi modelling of the temp at 10 hpa is now catching my eye. i dont recall any of the previous modelled warmings this month and last showing the same pattern run after run at the T340+ timeframe. ed's date of the 5th might be a couple days early. shame on you !!

     

    As long as EC is not joining GFS in the warming trend, I'd be very carefull. Posted Image

    • Like 2
  8. No downgrade.

     

    Posted Image

     

    +4 Towards the centre

     

    Posted Image

     

    -12 But has pushed a good deal into the Arctic and is pressing on against the frozen core.

     

    Todays 06z confirms this development. Funny, GFS was hinting on the strong Asian warming/displacement some days ago, only to switch to a more split-like evolution. Now GFS seems to have picked up on the displacement again and is actually looking pretty at high levels. Could this be due to tropospheric developments ie. MT events? Anyone?

  9.  

    Quiet sun ??

     

    http://www.bbc.co.uk...onment-25743806

     

    "This means that less UV radiation hits the stratosphere - the layer of air that sits high above the Earth. And this in turn feeds into the jet stream - the fast-flowing air current in the upper atmosphere that can drive the weather."

     

     

     

    "The era of solar inactivity in the 17th Century coincided with a period of bitterly cold winters in Europe."

     

     

     

     

    Any comments??

     

     

     

    Well, perhaps slightly off-topic here. In paleoclimate, changes in solar irradiative forcing are the main driver behind climate change on the long term (ice ages, interglacials, etc) with CO2 following warming. This is mainly due to Milankovitch cycling, not to the 11-year solar cycle. When compared to anthropogenic factors, the variation in radiative forcing caused by the 11-year cycle is relatively minor. On a global scale that is (see graph below from IPCC5).

     

    On the other hand, climate and paleoclimate is not the same as weather and we may -as the article describes- see a local effect of low solar activity in Europe. I'm not sure if the colder winters in Europe (it sparked the imagination of many painters here in the Netherlands) can actually be explained by reduced zonality in the stratosphere. I am not aware of any papers referring to this and to my knowledge this has not been included in climate models. But, as our planet continues to warm, the effect of reduced solar activity may be mitigated to some extend. 

     

    Posted Image

    • Like 4
  10. Can this potential ST warming give some cold to Scandinavia the first week in February?And with that i mean temperatures below -15° daytime even in south Sweden / Denmark? 

     

    Isn't it freezing cold already in Scandinavia (in Dutch we say "the stones freeze out of the ground" or "it freezes so hard, it cracks")? Even if we were sure favourable stratosphere model predictions verified, we would be unable to answer this question in this time-frame, mainly due to variability in the troposphere. Remember that the stratospheric charts shown here are all model output and by no means fixed boundary conditions/input (like solar activity, orography, or SSTs, for instance) for the models.

     

    @blizzard: we move from displacement to split and back again. Every run is a different story. Some with happy endings for us, others with a happy ending for the vortex. 

    • Like 1
  11. So, any thoughts on the recent GFS runs? Asian warming/wave-1 seems unable to force the vortex of the pole completely, me thinks. Some runs (like the 18z) pick up on wave-2 afterwards, splitting the vortex. Other runs continue the wave-1 attack while keeping the vortex mostly intact. 

     

    Any thoughts on what is causing this run-to-run inconsistency?

  12. Like the Berlin output. Zonal winds low down look great and the strat split as high as 20hpa late on . Would be nice to see that repeat, especially when we have a monster depression headed east at the same timescale (could do with that hitting ed's invisible split vortex brick wall!)

     

    Yes, very encouraging with a nice split in the lower strat. Although wave-2 activity is deminishing overall, wave-2 is still active/present in the lower strat/trop. In fact, it may be the highest wave-2 activity lower down I have seen this winter.

     

    Posted Image

    • Like 1
  13. is that a split vortex we are looking at on the 06z GFS at 384hrs?

     

    Posted Image

     

     

    A very shortlived split (ish) signature at 100hPa just before this trop chart. At these levels the stratosphere is severly influenced by the troposphere and in my view it's way too early to search for splits at the >100hPa level. The tropospheric (especially in lower levels) output varies wildy from run to run after the Asian warming currently peaking at ~300hrs. Will we see the Asian warming ramp up, or do we switch to a wave-2 pattern? Too early to tell and frankly, I am waiting for the Asian warming to show up in the Berlin graphs before making any calls on the lower strat. Btw: upper strat temperatures significantly lower this morning when compared to the previous GFS runs. 

     

    Posted Image

×
×
  • Create New...