Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Ruben Amsterdam

Members
  • Posts

    132
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ruben Amsterdam

  1. I can't help but thinking that GFS outer FI is showing the onset of a proper SSW now. Ofcourse, very far away still, but not entirely unlikely given the persistent troposferic pattern. 

    gfsnh-10-384.png

     

    Edit: the GFS12z operational turned the warming signal slightly down, but it is still there. Meanwhile, we see the dipole pattern rotate somewhat, with main height anomalies over Canada and the cortex core over Northern Russia. I suspect we are very close to reversal at this point. The pattern is also present lower down (30hPa) and, if you would litteraly translate this down to the troposphere, one would expect the lowest gph to move slowly eastward over Scandinavia towards Russia while heights are rising over Greenland again. Do any of the more knowledgeable on the subject have any thoughts about this?

    NH_HGT_10mb_384-4.gifNH_HGT_30mb_384.gif

    • Like 5
  2. Quote

    u profiles from GEFS have relaxed from the vaunted Canadian Warming angle/ reversal - this I know is a trend as have got excited about this prior to vortex intensification in previous years, for Ed to reign me in! you can see the shift in projection and tightening of the ensembles as we exit the disruption of the anomalous heat flux. 

    Speaking of which is shown on the first plot a considerable incursion to the vortex and interesting to see it stick around the upper levels of the vortex, juxtaposed is the u response and note the disruption (blue) and the forecast acceleration in vortex activity from here. 

    Some less pretty modelling I suspect for those inclined to enjoy the NH blocking anomalies as we enter the climatalogical vortex development phase.

    I tend to disagree with the above re. recovery of the vortex and tightening of the ensemble members. Even in the "tightened" ensemble the strongest u mean winds do not even match the wind speeds from early October. Besides, I believe GFS's ultimate FI is tending towards a more displaced vortex in contrast to runs from a few days ago and, on top of that, todays ensemble shows that there are still options for a double dip-scenario (of course considering the limitations, 65NB only, of these graphs). 

    u_65N_10hpa-2.pngu_65N_10hpa_gefs.png

     

    • Like 4
  3. 6 hours ago, feb1991blizzard said:

    Does anyone think that split will be sustainable for long enough to enable Tropospheric high latitude blocking to occur during December?

    I guess in case of a split much depends on the actual positioning of the strongest part of the vortex (in the lower stratosphere). We should hope for the minor part to set up shop over Greenland with the bulk of all "blue and purple" concentrated over the Asian and Alaskan sector. If this works out well for us, I think we may have a good shot at it. 

    • Like 3
  4. On 22 Oct 2016 at 10:16, davster11 said:

    A complete novice but the learning curve is steep following you guys.

    I have a simple question, I won´t try backing it up with my personal arguments, I'll simply ask the question:
    Has science ruled out the possibility that SSWs can contribute to significant cooling?

    Bearing the rules of thermodynamics in mind, spreading a concentrated cooled down area to a large warmer area and having 
    that area being cooled down again seems like it would....cool things down?

     

    I have been thinking about this again and I think it is a nice thought experiment to add the Southern hemisphere into the equation. The SH is completely different to our half of the globe as it lacks large landmasses and mountain ranges at middle latitudes. This results in far less wave breaking, and subsequently SSWs are very rare. I think this is one of the reasons that Antartica is not warming as fast as the Arctic: the tight vortex makes the continent actually more isolated to warmth from lower latitudes.

    • Like 7
  5. 11 hours ago, davster11 said:

    A complete novice but the learning curve is steep following you guys.

    I have a simple question, I won´t try backing it up with my personal arguments, I'll simply ask the question:
    Has science ruled out the possibility that SSWs can contribute to significant cooling?

    Bearing the rules of thermodynamics in mind, spreading a concentrated cooled down area to a large warmer area and having 
    that area being cooled down again seems like it would....cool things down?

     

    Hei and welcome from neighbouring Norway ;)

    I don't think science rules anything out per se, but a quick glance at the literature does not really yield any papers that directly address your question. I assume you mean cooling at the surface by the way? As far as I know IPCC assumes the stratosphere in general to cool down as a result of climate change. 

    What comes to my mind is that, yes, stratospheric events can cause colder than average temperatures at lower latitudes but at the same time these events are usually accompanied by strong WAA that causes warmer than average conditions in other places, usually at high latitudes. For example, the average temperature yesterday in Longyearbyen, Spitsbergen, was +7.4°C in stead of the normal -6.5°C (winter has not arrived there at all so far, very concerning). Also, stratospheric events occur irregularly and are temporary in nature.

    I think that global warming/Arctic Amplification (snow, ice, and vegetation albedo feedbacks) is causing the arctic to warm so rapidly and to such extend that it far outweighs any possible effects of temporary stratospheric events. 

    • Like 6
  6. Crewcold, I would not call it a split (yet). However, the blue "tail" does show the vortex is not happy as could be ;)

    Quote

    GFS suggestive of a possible eventual split at the end of the run into November, certainly a lot of pressure being put on the fledgling vortex.

    As others have said, very interesting.

     

    • Like 1
  7. 44 minutes ago, blizzard81 said:

    Looking at 00z ECM Debilt ensembles, and there are more colder members in the mid to long term when compared to yesterday's 12z set.

    This mornings run (note that this is for the eastern part of the Netherlands, close to the German border, De Bilt is in central the Netherlands and is a bit warmer, usually) shows some colder members indeed. Mostly inversion weather in a slow continental flow, would be my guess. I also included an ensemble with wind directions which shows a tendency towards more south/easterly winds instead of south westerly wind, but this is not all convincing yet.

    pluim_volledig_06280.png

    From top to bottom: T2m, dew point, precip., wind 10m, wind 10m gusts, cloud cover.

    Screen Shot 2015-12-20 at 13.13.55.png

    • Like 2
  8. Slap in the face yes, knock-out blow no. 

    All forecasts seem to let this wave subside at the +240-300 timeframe. At the outer reaches of FI the wave may revive but its strength is as yet unknown. If no renewed and stronger activity is in the forecast at new year, I fear we have to surrender to this almighty vortex..

    I still feel EC is a bit more progressive at the upper strat but that remains to be seen. I'm not very optimistic at this point.

    • Like 1
  9. 2 hours ago, carinthian said:

    Hi Ruben, Whats the latest. See 16C now reached in parts of Benelux.

     C

    15.3 is the max. at the official station De Bilt so far. I do not expect it to rise any further given the cooling trend in the last hour. Some other parts of the country reached temperatures of >16ºC.

    Highest max. temp recorded at an amateur station (stations that meet national standards, but are not official stations of the Dutch met. service) is 18.9ºC in the south-east of the country. That's mad!

    So, not a new Tmax record, but ex equo score. We can still break some all-time winter daily average and minimum temperature records though. 

    GMT_TXTX_latest.png

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...