Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

GSP

Members
  • Posts

    263
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by GSP

  1. Went to bed around 1am with some potent little storms trundling their way east to west up the Estuary.

    Then the next thing it was around 3.30-4am and the real show started with frequent lightning, though we didn’t get any close boomers that can force their way into your chest as you lie there.

    Of real note however was the noise and intensity of the rain. Thank goodness that did not last too long, it felt like it would do damage and I will be checking the loft later for starters.

  2. 17 minutes ago, Froze were the Days said:

    The amount of times I've heard that the last few days...then looked and been underwhelmed.

    There should be plenty of caveats around with these models and forecasts. Events still 5 days away where just one little feature moving 50 miles can have a big say on an outcome.

    • Like 1
  3. 5 minutes ago, Jason M said:

    Its really only felt like a couple of days worth of Cold Northerly to me, so were in the same camp I suspect. 

    There is still the chance though that this low will stay South and that could really dramatically impact things going forward. 

    Even if the low comes north I think it will be a slow process so we could see quite a few hours snow before it all goes back to rain.

    Quite true. What’s left of the ‘plunge’ from the north on Sunday/Monday is still 5 days away yet, and as you say it’s not beyond the realms that low to the south may play ball to our advantage in some way.

    I would not call it experience, but just viewing charts for 25 years plus says however our dominant wind direction normally has the biggest say in the end.

    That’s why I prefer, certainly for here a wind from the east without any southern low intervention.
    Yesterday surprisingly delivered a little more than I expected.

    • Like 3
  4. 13 minutes ago, offerman said:

    This is a good point about what you said about it being nailed on. There were a lot of comments about ensembles all pointing into the same direction that it was nailed on despite but GFS had wobbled and gone the other way, but turns out it looks like GFS could be correct.

    I think what needs to be addressed, is that when all the ensembles are nailed on what are driving factors for such dramatic changes to something that was to a dead due to the ensembles.

    I always say when it’s so far out, there’s always gonna be an inconsistency and chance that it won’t happen despite what ensembles say as the weather seems to be so fickle now super computers and symbols. Everything just seems to struggle much more now than ever.

    not a criticism of anyone or computers it’s just the fact that it’s extremely difficult and I don’t know if there is anything or will be anything around that will make it more accurate, especially at this time of the year.

    when we get locked into zonal patterns, they do seem to be easier to predict with low pressures just rolling in from the Atlantic non-stop at times.

    and in summer high-pressure generally seem to be easier to forecast.

    I think at this time of year, with so many different weather types possible from all directions, it just makes it so much more complex with all the other added factors

     

    And remember like us it’s also with weather models.

    “All it takes is one voice, singing in the darkness…..”.

    • Like 2
  5. 16 minutes ago, Continental Climate said:

    Situations like this are exactly why experienced heads are essential. Newer members viewing this will quite rightly think it's game over. Wiser heads know that GFS usually has a wobble or two at this time scale and will comes back on board after a day or two. Hopefully that's the case in this instance as well. I personally think it's a wobble, however I don't think this will be a memorable cold spell at all probably on a par with what we got up here late Nov early Dec. We got 3 days of falling snow with it sticking around for 5 days. We need the blocking to start reaserting itself soon and that's just not happening. 

    Or, as in a number of previous times in these circumstances, more and more models come into line, and meet in the middle with any models that disagree at that time.

    • Like 2
  6. 15 minutes ago, Battleground Snow said:

    It's the position and strength of the Arctic high causing the slight model variations,

    The general pattern looks set though, in terms on the Arctic high pushing the trop vortex south.

    Is there any stats on Arctic/polar verification for the models?

    Agree, it still hasn’t quite worked it out yet.

    Feel, as usual we are going to need a bit of luck with this still though. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  7. 2 hours ago, Met4Cast said:

    Yeah I have no words,.

    gfsnh-0-228.thumb.png.6baf9eb546cc1850b676cf3146585fde.png

    This is why we all do this, charts like this is precisely why we go through the pain of this every single year. Unbelievable Jeff.

    Waiting for a weather VR package to be created. We could have charts then experience the weather with no breakdowns, hiccups, spoilers.
    We get what we ordered!

    • Like 2
  8. 14 minutes ago, Frigid said:

    -10-15C uppers with slack winds.. Potentially -4C highs with widespread lows in minus double digits. From a low point to the coldest run we've seen this winter, it's astonishing to see how the 6z progressed. All JFF for now, but very encouraging to see repeated low points in the MO still produce a great end. I can't recall ever seeing these charts in January, truly fascinating. 

    image.thumb.png.1166c11a52760f9728e47fdd713b7f99.png  image.thumb.png.cf199c571e0570cba8829df0fad126be.png

    I’ve seen ‘too good to be true’ charts for January, which ended up as mild south westerlies come the time.

    We are so far out still. The theme is much the same which is encouraging, but I’m seeing little changes which may be important come the time.

    Take this one, all it would need is a little shift north and it’s game over, but hoped to be proved wrong.

    image.thumb.png.2fdee9d9561d8a64c759e26a8dfbb726.png

    • Like 4
    • Insightful 1
  9. 7 minutes ago, okidoke said:

    We always do this. .. get over excited to soon I remember years a very similar set up all models showed cold .. and snow then 1 Member showed mild .. .and the flip was insane so remember nothing is set in stone till you actually see it and feel it lol

    “and snow then 1 Member showed mild..”

    All it takes is one voice, singing in the darkness…

    • Like 2
  10. 15 minutes ago, Jo Farrow said:

    The cold front did reach right down across Europe

    Could contain:

    Could contain:

    Thanks Jo. On the 2nd chart, looking at everything that appears to be connected back to the centre of the storm, it’s reach appears to have been felt from Finland to North Africa.

    Quite a reach in the end from the initial focus around our country and France.

    • Like 5
  11. 25 minutes ago, Fitzwis said:

    This is devastating. Many of the trees on South Hill in St Helier have stood tall and proud for longer than I dare to remember, surviving many a windstorm, until now 🥲

    No doubt St Helier Parks and Gardens will rejuvenate the area for future generations to enjoy 😊

     

    So sad to see. With trees snapped and in that condition, looks like the same or another tornado passed through to me.

    • Like 4
×
×
  • Create New...