Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

OldMetMan

Members
  • Posts

    423
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by OldMetMan

  1. It would need to push Westwards far enough to keep any Atlantic troughs at bay though wouldn't it?

    Remember last Winter - am i right in saying the Russian High actually acted as the UK's 'foe', by not pushing far enough West, so keeping troughs effectively stalled right over the UK?

     

    Fine margins, indeed, for this little ole island on the edge of the Atlantic.

    Yes indeed! I can recall many winters where HP was close but not close enough to give us the full benefit of the continental flow. Ideally, we need blocking to the N as well, but one step at a time! Later runs might give us a clue as to whether this is a viable option. I shall comment in more detail later if the models warrant it!

    • Like 3
  2. Great post, written with the maturity and knowledge I could only dream of having !!

     

    To my untrained and very much bedroom enthusiast eye,  Looking further ahead (which always going to be about looking for trends ??), IMO that there really doesn't seem to be one and when there's a lack of trend in the models it tells me that a half way house between what is being shown is the most likely outcome. 

     

    To that end I wouldn't be surprised if after this week, we see a continuation of the UK being stuck between High pressure to the West, and High pressure to the East with Low pressure squeezing between the gaps. 

     

    Something a bit like what peturbation 12 is showing

    gens-12-1-288.png?6

     

     

    As you say though anything is plausible I just wanted to find some way of saying that your post was awesome other than putting some one liner that would be deleted :-)

    Thank you kindly EML Network. I could just be talking a load of rubbish (not for the first time!) but I tend to trust my instincts when I spot something unusual or in some way significant in the model runs.

    You make some valid comments in your post re the movement of HP over the next week or so with cold fronts in between. I think we tend to forget sometimes that a great part of our day-to-day weather is pretty ordinary, but with, it seems, increasing incidence of more extreme conditions. Half the fun of model watching is being able to detect real signs of such events in advance as well as significant pattern changes, which the models don't often do in the >5 day range. But it's all good fun!

    • Like 8
  3. Yes I misread your post OMM, so apologies for that. My mind has been concentrated on future developments. Well as much as my mind can concentrate these days. From my reading of the anomaly charts I can't see the blocking re-develop unless there is a fairly drastic pattern change shortly. My bet would still be a cold incursion from the NW if I had to place a bet.

    No problem Knocker.

    It's a very tough call at the moment really. The only other thing that has caught my attention today is the tendency for a more amplified hemispheric 500mb pattern. But that in itself only hints at possible future blocking. So much depends on the long wave locations. But it sure looks a lot different from this time last year!

    • Like 1
  4. Here is what the Met O said on 7th regarding the uncertainty over the future of Bertha:

     

    "The transition from a tropical to an extra-tropical feature is a particularly hard one to forecast with confidence, so there are still some differences in the location and intensity of the resulting depression, which is expected to pass over, or close to, the UK from early on Sunday."

     

    However, this is what the NHC in Florida said in its last advisory on Bertha on Wednesday 6th at 11am:

     

    "Satellite images indicate that Bertha has become associated with afrontal system and has acquired extratropical characteristics. Thelow-level center is devoid of deep convection and is on the cold airside of a frontal cloud band or trough extending from Nova Scotiasouthwestward to the Bahamas. In addition, there is a strongwesterly upper-level jet over the system.The low is moving toward the northeast or 055 degrees at 27 knotssteered by the mid-latitude westerlies. Most of the global modelskeep the post-tropical cyclone moving rapidly northeastward andthen eastward over the North Atlantic."

     

    So it seems the transition from tropical to extra-tropical had already occurred by the time the Met O decided to discuss it on their website. It looks to me like the NHC's forecasters had a better handle on Bertha's future than our own forecasters did, yet both presumably had access to the same data. It'll be interesting to see how the forecast develops over today and tomorrow  

    • Like 1
  5. For an ex met observer I find this a rather surprising comment. The immense technical problem this kind of thing throws up has yet to be solved in any computer model. So 'dithering' is hardly the right word I would say. Uncertainty, yes, and perfectly understandable. This morning the 3 main models are still no in agreement although returning to basics may be called for if they still have not got very close agreement by the 12z output this afternoon. At least the models now have a good fix on its position since it turned into an ex tropical storm over the last 12 hours, so surface and upper air details should become less problematical from now on.

     

     

    Maybe dithering is a bit strong but that's how it seemed to me. I say this mostly because of the run-to-run consistency of the GFS, whereas, apparently, according to the MetO's site, their own models have not shown such consistency. This suggests the ambivalence lies more with the forecasters than the model output; the Met O forecasters are concerned that their own model output has not been doing what the GFS has and have been reluctant to commit to any particular output other than their own. You know more about forecasting processes than I, obviously, when it comes to choosing which model or models to favour.

     

    I appreciate the difficulties involved here, but to still be this uncertain so close to the event is somewhat unusual. As I see it, the tropical origins of Bertha, at this point in development, would tend to favour significant development simply because of the presence of the very warm air over the centre - the legacy of an ex-hurricane - and the proximity of the low to the jet entrance, which I would expect all the models to be able to take proper account of. This is the story the GFS has been telling for days so that model at least doesn't have a problem with the low's origins.

     

    From a purely historical point of view, ex-tropical storms have caused significant early gales during summer on a number of occasions. so this one does seem, as I said, well placed to do the same. As you say, maybe today's output will clinch it.

    • Like 1
  6. But can we infer a trend from the past few years?

    In terms of records being broken, that by itself suggests longer cycles of change for that to even happen, such as this winter and another example, the extreme cold of December 2010.This is why I think we can learn much from these long patterns when it comes to model output. Maybe other factors can be brought into model development, ones that were either previously unknown or not given enough emphasis, who knows!But certainly in my experience, I have never seen so many extremes in such a relatively short space of time as has happened in recent years.
    • Like 7
  7. Well that's it then! The yanks are saying the worlds weather systems (jet streams) are probably changing and weather patterns will be locked for longer periods of time. Well, that's definitely the case this winter but I'd bet my mortgage (if I had one) that it will be totally different next winter.

    In my experience, the position of the jet has always been variable, and has also stayed in the same relative position for extended periods, hence the extreme summers/winters there have been. They are talking about it as if it were a new phenomenon, when it isn't. It just happens that the location this winter has been to such as to bring LPs on a more southerly path, just as it did in summer 2007, when all the floods occurred then.

     

    You're right next winter could be completely different. Who knows also whether the jet may shift again this year before it warms up too much. The US forecast guidance today is talking about a marked change from a zonal to a highly amplified pattern across the US in the next few days - that's bound to affect us downstream.

     

    If there is one thing I have learned over so many years of watching the weather - never say never!

    • Like 3
  8. I have to admit.....for all we look at the models to guide us on what a winter will turn out to be, the object of much derision on here, the Daily Express, might well have scooped them all back in November...100 DAYS OF HEAVY RAIN: Britain now facing worst winter in SIXTY YEARS warn forecastersOk OK I changed it a bit.....but only one word!!!

    I suspect that they are saving that actual headline to apply to the Summer, only in place of "in sixty years" it'll be "ever", knowing them. I like that they take an interest in the weather, but it would be nice to see, now and then, something they write which is even remotely near the facts. Exaggeration doesn't really cover it!

  9. A few glimmers of hope today for something drier in the coming days.

     

    After today's LP, the next system coming in from the W has been shown consistently as a filling system by the models, becoming absorbed into the main LP to the N and NE. As I see it, we have a small window of opportunity the middle of next week with a chance for HP to nose down from the N and NW. This ties in with what John was saying about anomalies, and also with the fact that we currently have a small 500mb high cell over SE Greenland.

     

    post-13989-0-99066900-1392371839_thumb.p

     

    It all depends on whether the LP in the W Atlantic mid-week next week develops and turns N rather than NE and some 500mb troughing occurs behind it. This might be enough to increase heights ahead of it to support rising pressure. The 120H UKMet chart today shows this possibility:

     

    post-13989-0-32199400-1392371999_thumb.p

     

    The other models are kind of vague at this point, showing no real amplification that might help, but it might become clearer in future runs today. As I recall, the GFS had suggested this on and off for some days, but, as ever, high uncertainty remains.

     

    I remain convinced that a pattern change is coming, slowly to be sure, but on its way. Even the possibility of a pressure rise over the Continent would be welcome right now, as shown by the ECM. Anything to stop this never-ending rain!

     

     

     

    • Like 4
×
×
  • Create New...