mikeworst

"US based, but interesting and necessary step I think." Have a really careful think about this Born. AGW is a theory or hypothosis at best. No impirical evidence has been produced that shows co2 causes global temperature increase despite theoretical calculations. The high altitude hot-spot that all models need to verify water vapour feedback does not exist. The missing hot-spot is an example of empirical evidence that counters the theory of water vapour feedback. The 21st century has seen no warming at all. And then they have the temerity to say "ending an era in which climate skepticism has been allowed to seep into the nation's classrooms. There is every reason to be sceptical and not shove untested and unproven theory down the throats of gullible students. First let them prove their case or stand down until they can.

Lazerguy I have to agree with you on this. The shoddy state of what is touted as science in many of these publications/ pronouncements etc. is really quite embarrassing. Presentation is actually key in determining the actual expertise and understanding in any subject the person/organization is showcasing and the care taken in that presentation is telling. This is the same in business as it is in any other situation such as personal relationships, job hunting and so on.

I was going to do just that on the p r thread but decided that I could do without all the flak that comes with it. On reflection though I would be prepared to air my opinions as a sceptic of AGW.

Thank you for that deleting all that mods and I apologise for my response as well. Onwards and upwards.

I was not asking you Born and I am well aware that you are not a mod. I have made it quite clear that I acuse noone of anything. I offer my own opinions and if that includes my opinion that some here are totally denying well, that is my opinion and I am entitled to express it, unless of course the mods here would wish to pull a "Real Climate" type censorship on alternative thinking. Could be bad PR chaps.

GW and associates, as an optimist to a bunch of (in my opinion ) serial pessimists may I present my conversion from believer to sceptic in AGW without the usual snark and so on, promising to read it to the end? It may shed some light on yhe PR issue.