Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Uncertainty

Members
  • Posts

    715
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Uncertainty

  1. 2 minutes ago, Glaswegianblizzard said:

    Only people will have forgotten as when the time comes the same posts will be getting made about another ten days time. I get what everyone is saying about patterns, trends etc, but until I see it forecasted on met office, BBC, my iPhone weather app or even the Norwegian met, then I’m not buying it I’m afraid. 
     

    Accompanying these excited posts are forecasted highs of 4c in glasgow on 23rd and 24th. Frigid it absolutely is not. Why does everyone fall for this still?

    It’s still fun to get excited about it though pal. Make your own judgement regarding whether it’s actually going to happen.
     

    Those excited posts are part of the lifeblood of this forum, just as the ‘winters over’ memoirs after the Inevitable 0z backtracks appear are!
     

    This pattern is more than just a one-run GFS wonder though. But, as you say, it’s a long way off being ‘in the bag’. And any exact details regarding surface temps, precipitation types and amounts are moot as this stage.

    • Like 6
  2. image.thumb.png.854b8a6440c1b8b4a01d960d52745f4e.png
    Yes GEM trending more amplified after a soggy Wednesday, even though it develops the mid week low it’s the upstream amplification a few days later  that’s key to the post Xmas day pattern.

    Regardless of Uppers, PPN etc, the fact that 3 successive GFS, the GEM and to a lesser extent ECM op and control get to this point is significant. Given the strat support for a Scandi trough we can now say that some manifestation of this broad pattern is probable. The question is how high can we get this ridge to go? 
     

    In other news...

    Positive temperatures in the strat alert!

    image.thumb.png.830ad5b9ded527b563b486ab21863fdf.png

    That is less than two weeks away and a consistent signal (of course not always to this extent...)

    Ahead of schedule surely? No complaints from here  though if this run verifies, at either atmospheric level!

    • Like 7
  3. 6 minutes ago, Mapantz said:

    A clear trend South by the 23rd, with the control and mean following the OP - looking at the London 850 ensemble so far..

    FI at day 4 though!

     

    Yep but need it south on ALL major models tomorrow to be safe, especially and obviously the ECM.

    Bear in mind GEM also has the secondary low and lots and lots of rain. These two models together represent a significant element of NOAA and, presumably, Exeter’s musings...

    • Like 3
  4. 12 minutes ago, chionomaniac said:

    All I am left thinking is that there is plenty of time for this to improve further still with further runs

    Glad you think that Ed, do you think that that low that got sucked to the to the SW, rather than sent through the UK, is propping up the high? E.G do you feel that trapping it to the SW is necessary for the ridge to gain enough amplification to produce 18z esque outcomes?

    image.thumb.png.d3bb482cd5c5c8720154f3016de13100.png

    You can see the same low pressure has become rather convoluted over the Azores, right where the high normally resides.

    All the good ens I’ve seen have the ridge riding over that low and allow it to build well Northwards, resulting in a sort of super-topler. Those that send the low through the UK as a well developed system never seem to have enough amplitude in the long wave pattern to sustain the following ridge to anything more than ECM’s damp WNW squib.

    • Like 2
  5. EC clusters actually quite revealing tonight. after days of too many or too little to make sense of. The headline is: a big fat euro trough. Or at least, for those feeing pedantic, a lack of persistent euro heights.
    image.thumb.png.06c3564d13850c53c994aa922eb8ab29.png

    This straight away tells you there is interest in the charts for those of a cold loving disposition. A slug is a hopeless, persistent winter waster and flood maker. It’s absence paves the way for low pressure to dive into Europe, the angle of which determining the surface weather we receive. On the latest GFS iteration, given the better amplitude, we  are surely expecting an even bigger and straighter drop of the low into Europe day 9 and 10?

    image.thumb.png.b7d3aa4e775500e14bbb312d5e34ca52.png

    Sure looks that way!

    PS this is becoming a real saga... if the  ECM doesn’t drop that SW low and associated lower amplitude ridge in the morning then surely it has this nailed. If it does finally give it up then charts such as those above become eminently possible!

    • Like 2
  6. 18 minutes ago, sheikhy said:

    Gona stick my neck out and say a massive flip is about to happen to much more colder snowier charts in the next day or so!!the models especialy the gfs just trying to get round to it!!!

    It’s still there pal, this Late December  cold pattern has been progged for months by the seasonals, for weeks and weeks by the EC46 and for 4/5 days on the ENS/EPS. It’s hardly an aberration. It’s still not in the bag though so don’t pop champagne just yet! Don’t want a Jan 19 rerun!

  7. This really has been a tricky pattern for the det runs to nail down. There is as much spread in the strength and amplitude of the incoming Atlantic ridge tonight as there was 3-4 days ago. Some GFS ensembles have prize winning blocks, representative example perturbation 9image.thumb.png.eb12d0ff9885d6890128adc38164f049.png 

    Which isn’t dissimilar to the Icon which has been separating and cutting off the low to the south west consistently for days now...

    image.thumb.png.a08021b75cc5fc79cf1dd614efce3644.png

    A good size cluster of the GEFS resemble the mean, which in itself is more amplified than the 6z

    image.thumb.png.613a99b98f987d731a0b1330a78a89b8.png
    Recent ECM ops resemble this mean but beforehand they have powered the low to the SW through the UK bringing heavy rain and, presumably, local flooding 
     

    image.thumb.gif.7d4de3803e955c2cfced82747901d4b6.gif

    This unpalatable scenario is also linked to a weaker upstream ridge and less amplification of the Eastern Seaboard. This could lead to a toppler and west north westerlies behind at best.

    The good news is the UKMO says absolutely not to this scenario, tracks the first low to the south of the UK, doesn’t really develop it and cuts off the second low, here at 120

    image.thumb.gif.abf6800889e7c0c01c15c2bee8657713.gif
    The low to the southwest gets trapped under the building ridge to the west, I think the 168 would lead to a cold UK high and a frosty, seasonal Xmas day many on this forum and beyond would happily settle for. With potential for this to move NE with time and keep things interesting.

    As noted by @Allseasons-siThe GEM after some fodder has produced an interesting outcome at day 10, deja vu to the evolution at the start of this amplification journey we are on, back in V late November, a ridge building through the UK to form a wedgey Scandi high. Another positive solution, if not well supported as yet.

    image.thumb.png.e8925ff35a849e47ea36e46fd49df0a9.png
     

    So lots to like for cold seekers out there so far this evening. Let’s hope the ECM sacks off this nasty second low and gives its best GFS perturbation 9 impression. We all know that if it does it’ll kick off in here and, before Christmas in this vile year, what a tonic that would be.

    image.png

    • Like 8
    • Thanks 1
  8. 7 minutes ago, feb1991blizzard said:

    The GEFS and EPS are both a stonker in FI, how come BBC are going mild?

    image.thumb.png.0763ac0b6a69da35ece14d66da2eedd8.png

    Feb I’d wait until the monthly outlook comes out tomorrow, they’ve been hinting at a cold snap in some regard back end of the month for the last few updates. Hopefully they’ll reinforce that tomorrow.

    Vis the 18z ensembles... image.thumb.png.1bed2038945f0696d621a424f8c404c4.png

    Not far off a mean North Easterly there. Good concordance with the EPS at the same timeframe

    image.thumb.png.b8194370573159e8b18aaba656918604.png
     

    Noaa also ‘on board’ with the blocking signal. 
     

    image.thumb.gif.7159752fb542d2e31bd4c79235aa4bee.gif
     

    We’re 3 for 3!

    Gonna need more than a sofa to hide behind in the morning to watch the 0z come out though... there’s more twists to come I’m sure...

    image.gif

    • Like 4
  9. 2 minutes ago, Scott Ingham said:

    Yeah I take your point on board. Im getting carried away with looking for the Jackpot scrnario. If we did have a split falling in the right place though theres no doubt wed have 4 weeks minimum in a stuck pattern like that. But your senseible head is completely correct. It could indeed scupper this as could the flushing down of zonal winds in the right place which i did call for after the greenie high with a colder shot end of jan

    I think you’re both right here. The dream scenario this winter always was the blocked December predicted by the seasonals verifying then we get the big mid Jan SSW with correct split location etc and a Feb91/10/18 redux. The fact this scenario remains possible is wonderful in itself. In my view if we don’t get the SSW we get VI which means zonal winds get flushed down followed by zonal winds getting flushed down. So a Feb2020 redux. No thanks.

    I’d take a short period of zonal flushing (?!?) to get two genuine cold spells this year. 
    Hell most years I’d take a frost and no red rain warnings thank you very much!

    • Like 7
  10. @Zak MInteresting to see the JMA evolve like that, I had only looked at the 192

    image.thumb.gif.09f71458796ac27ffa201dd1b5efa596.gif

    I have seen countless charts like that topple and given the WAA wasn’t massively vertical I thought this one would too, but then we end up with a beautiful chart

    image.thumb.gif.ea12ff7fa371bf883228b9b878904350.gif

    Not quite as beautiful as the latter stages of the Siberian high show on the GFS though!

    Its amazing how the snow cover advancement through November has finally, after such a sweltering year, cooled the Siberian land mass. According to the good Dr Cohen this has given the Siberian high more vigour this year and indeed, it’s already perturbed the SPV enough to allow us this chance. Even on the 18z you can see how it has linked with the building UK high to form an Uber block. 
     

    image.thumb.png.fcd50df2f839d6c0929373e37af48a2b.png

    You can see the link/up around Finland there at day 10. The Arctic high hops in there too. This evolution is perfect for the long game because... As @CreweCold rightfully asserts, this is critical to pump big problems into the stratospheric PV. Will the Siberian high gather itself once more to strike the fatal blow? 

    The seasonals say no but the weather folk’s hearts and knowledge say yes!

    It’s human vs algorithm for the fate of mid winter! 

     

    image.gif

    • Like 8
    • Thanks 1
  11. image.thumb.png.373bb785d1bf5e5112811a4d568e2320.png
    Yes @Allseasons-siStrongest signal yet for Atlantic amplification from the GEFS. But can we trust it?

    Not yet, if this is to come off we at least need a string of EC ops to go with it soon. Last night’s effort wasn’t bad but this morning’s is ugly and has weak, transient amplification and a continuation of the wet and mild pattern we have now, perhaps focused a little further north with weak ridging over the south. A representative example of this solution from the GEFS

    image.thumb.png.3df16925dca58b763c9187e7b72c6907.png
    Notice how the next low Leaving the states is already toppling the ridge ahead of it

    image.thumb.png.e5cc612997ba7298b19d35800e4979a4.png

    The jet doesn’t even amplify to southern Greenland and hence the low simply powers through the Atlantic with our name now Stamped firmly on it.

    What those of a cold persuasion want of course is for the Northern stream jet to amplify sufficiently to allow a more significant high to develop to the NW. 

    image.thumb.png.2001f5d1899d7ac0305abf2be3f0bf43.png

    Here you can see the jet has moved Northwards up the southwestern coast of Greenland, allowing cold air to flood south.

    image.thumb.png.aad35b55d6dbf02bef87555b233b3a79.png
    Despite the improved signal on the 6z there are very few that build a long lasting ridge to the NW so a severe, long lasting cold spell is not signposted at present. As BA has rightfully mentioned, there’s more than just the MJO at play here, the Atlantic SSTs don’t fill me with confidence vis the strong Atlantic ridge and there are countless examples of the GEFS at day 9 overplaying Atlantic ridging, the 18z from last Thursday a case in point.

    Indeed looking at the EPS/GEPS the ridging looks transient, but a 2-3 day cold ‘snap’, especially for Northern areas is very much in the possibility space around the 23rd, so plenty to keep coldies (or ‘not southwesterlies’ like me!) interested over the festive period.

    • Like 2
  12. 12 minutes ago, Mike Poole said:

    Yes Matt, and @chionomaniac, I am on the verge of calling time on this winter, and this is very unusual for me.  I would like to explain why.  

    It is the Met Office and their model, GloSea5.  If it predicts mild with certainty it has never been wrong, as far as i can see (going to back to since it was GloSea4).  Last year it was right, and the reason was Indian Ocean Dipole.  I had never even heard of it and it delivered and then some.  The only time GloSea5 has been totally wrong has been, yes you’ve guessed it, when it has forecast cold.  I think it was 2016/17 winter, all looking good and then winter over by about 7 Dec if I recall correctly, wasn’t posting at the time much, @CreweCold will remember, as he was quite vociferous about it.  

    I’m concerned about our hobby.  If UK winter can be predicted like this, what is the point?  It removes the rush when something unexpected happens.  Analogy to gambling.  I like gambling, it gives me a rush.  Around year 2000 i had inside info into certain pub fruit machines and could make a regular profit, and guess what it wasn’t much fun, if you know you are going to win or lose it takes away the experience.  

    I think that is half way to where we are with winter now, unfortunately, we now know if we haven’t got a cat in hells chance of a cold winter half the years, but we don’t know, in the other years, if we’ve got a chance, maybe, maybe not.  I’m sure GloSea7 will be soon able to close off that element of our uncertainty and fun and novelty of proper wintery weather.  When I was a child, to find it had snowed overnight and flakes still falling in the morning, it was magical.  Now, it hardly ever happens, and GloSea7 will tell you which day of which month you might next expect that unlikely event to happen.  

    All the best, Mike

    I get this Mike and the latest Seasonals are a kick in the teeth and likely to be correct but they absolutely can’t discount a shorter cold spell within the broader westerly pattern. Moreover, Glosea didn’t get the Feb 2018 BFTE event and ensuing blocked early Spring right.... image.thumb.png.7694da45dddbb32c38fba26afb120901.png

    **Disclaimer - it has sadly got most things right since, including this summer gone...

    However, there is no chance in the next decade that seasonal forecasting will be able to definitively tell you the weather on a particular day. Hell, the ECM can’t get day 9 right most of the time and how often is the 144 UKMO wrong? Seasonal forecasting is powerful in Winter and I imagine very useful for planners, government departments and gas distribution managers but they can’t and won’t be putting the remit of this thread out of business any time soon pal. 
     

    That said the picture for Jan / Feb has been grim on the seasonals since August hence mine and other hope to cash in on the blocked December. All eyes then on that MJO passage later this month, should that fail... there may be dragons ahead

    • Like 6
    • Thanks 1
  13. 15 minutes ago, Steve Murr said:

    The 06z Mean at 168 > the 00z 174 mean

    Shows everything moving in the right direction at the right timeline

    * Svalbard troughing better alligned

    * Blocking more developed over Greenland

    * Atlantic ridge better defined

     

    180E170B-2212-4FE5-A51C-70DCE1237503.thumb.png.8e03e648b54c79c2baeb80c19c6719e7.png02D2CBBE-4724-4F91-8B1B-65EFB2B40C6F.thumb.png.06cc5c12c5cd544b2f048deff4d2a3fb.png

     

    Indeed Steve and flicking through the ens at day 9 a good many of them are going down similar routes to the op... there’s gonna be some stunners in there.

    An excellent trend 0z vs 6z

    image.thumb.png.34501433fd32292bfec28323775b2ecc.png
     

    image.thumb.png.469ec9427be9c7ed9f51fbc45f60ebbf.png

    The centre of the blocking now well west of the meridian and lower heights moving south east towards Iberia.

    As to the Eps I flicked through them all there’s so many options in there that you can understand why the cluster algorithm went for one cluster when, in reality, there’s almost every hemispheric permutation you can think of! There are many which end up slightly blocked but still have south westerlies for the UK but there are many that don’t and go onto to signpost easterlies.

    The GEM ensembles near to Christmas have a very unusual anomaly indeed.

    image.thumb.png.96b8eeac3f0c7bf2bdf993c557b12350.png

    I really hope the latest Glosea seasonal gives some credence to this potential  January SSW, it’s so frustratingly accurate these days in Winter. It would be brilliant to have it on board for the mid winter period.

    Genuinely fascinating model watching at present. 

     

    • Like 5
  14. 4 minutes ago, Steve Murr said:

    Ian Brown WTF moment. 
    42D41B90-6728-4934-B132-6C0CEEAA977A.thumb.png.d8c05ba6785e38dcac2379b4c321ec51.png

    Fair play to the GFS if it nails this evolution Steve. Ever since the ECM guys gave it a few pearls of wisdom, added to the extra strat resolution, it’s been a little better.

    The EC clusters did slightly favour this solution this morning though. Hopefully once the models polish their crystal balls it should become clearer tomorrow.

    • Like 6
  15. 21 minutes ago, feb1991blizzard said:

    Yes - i have my eyes on a mid - late Jan SSW, tbf i just can't get excited about the long drawn out purgatory run ups anymore - i love it when the SSW is coming into the 240 range and is showing on the berlin plots and the means, in my eyes, the whole month of Feb 18 was the best model watching period ever, when you get them insane runs coming out and in quantity as well, where you know your gonna end up with brutal uppers, just how brutal is the question, you know your gonna end up with snow, its just how big a dumping.

    Absolutely it was Feb. There was even the obligatory GFS wobble Mike if you remember...image.thumb.png.2b927841fff12af9d52cea48321402a1.png

    I think there was a run slightly earlier in the month, but well after the warming, that didn’t even build the initial UK high at all and just steamrolled the westerlies through - all adding to the fun.

    • Like 2
  16. 1 hour ago, feb1991blizzard said:

    Or would you rather have a similar one to what we have now.

    image.thumb.png.fec5fbea4d9feac1841e6aa9d786c231.png

     

    And where did that get us?

    Nowhere, lol. Even Glosea had us for a cold one that year didn’t it. This time it doesn’t. 

    But it did get precede an SSW that year, albeit one that favoured us little.

    But I agree that we’re always at the risk of vortex intensification at any point, and a half hearted reflection event can make it even worse -last year’s intense negative heat flux fiasco after the botched warming being a case in point). But seen as the Atlantic SSTs clearly don’t match 2010s I figure the only way we’re getting serious cold this year is a split ssw therefore a strong scandi-Greenland dipole for as long as possible is our best trop-based hope. 

    • Like 1
  17. Good afternoon everyone.

    Just a snapshot from the GEM

    image.thumb.png.3dc85838708509e3237532fe212f494f.png

    Not dissimilar from the GFS

    image.thumb.png.66140948ca464faadb7c20cc824c188f.png

    Icon also looked to be trending in a similar direction 

    image.thumb.png.7df07a09db45d6012be9d851988a3340.png
    Wet for the south yes but still seasonal with slider potential.

    If it wasn’t for the UKMO then we’d have had a reasonable set of medium term charts this afternoon although as @CreweCold and @Catacol point out, if we do get the Atlantic tilting positively against the trough to the east of the UK (which would of course manifest in a wet and windy pattern here at the surface) that may well intensify the pressure on the SPV which, clearly, is under some pressure already from that monster Urals high. We can see this from the Strat projections.

    image.thumb.png.f42876f1d7b03e4056875e8e6723f175.png

    image.thumb.png.57d5021c23f2305688109418ce65f961.png

    (Though notice a couple of bias corrected CFS members go AWOL later on and enter apocalypse mode, which shows the importance of the following...)

    For me, the longer that Urals high sticks around the better, the more wave breaks we see against it the better. We don’t want a half baked reflective event / displacement spilling over the cold into the US, we want a full on absorbtion event leading to a favourable split down the line. It looks right now to be 50/50 which makes sense in a WQBO/moderate Nina winter. If it fails then Glosea will be right as it usually is and we’re looking at Feb 2020 pt2. If it lands then we’re in the game.

     

    • Like 9
×
×
  • Create New...