The lights can be slow moving or highly dynamic with short (less than one second) pulses racing across the sky. The lights looked genuine although probably somewhat enhanced by the camera. It takes a really fast lens to capture motion in the lights and my guess is they had some sophisticated photo mutiplier in the gubbins of the camera. The colours can be intense and it looked a reasonable display with a typical curtain effect. Sometimes you can hang about for hours waiting with little but a dull green 'rainbow' somewhere to the North and then the sky will suddenly explode. In Scotland we don't get many good displays but when we do they are really spectacular with bright and vivid puples, yellows and reds besides the green. The best photos are pretty much exculsively of slow undulating shows whereas the best one I've seen was a highly dynamic full corona almost directly overhead. And, despite all the 'rules' this happend shortly after sunset and I was only a few miles from the house. It's solar minimum at the moment, moving slowly into sunspot cycle 24 but there have been good coronal holes producing enough solar wind to give some good lights in higher northern latitutes. Within the confines of the program, editing and time constraints I thought the whole piece was enchanting and the photography spectacular. Joana & Co. did a good job! Alas, I'll probably have to wait a couple of years untill cycle24 really gets under way and we get some good sunspots with X flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs) directed our way. Untill then I'll just have to make do with Spaceweather :lol: Spaceweather Aurora Gallery