Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

noggin

Members
  • Posts

    1,990
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by noggin

  1. I know that Sunday/Monday are a long way off, but I just have a feeling that it's going to be a damp squib.

    There just seems to be "something" missing. I can't quite put my finger on it.

    When we were forecast the snow last month, it just "seemed" to be a certainty and I believed that it would happen. This time, I have my doubts.

    Maybe I'm being fanciful, or maybe it's having the benefit of hindsight! Either way, I am just not feeling it this time. I didn't feel it the other night either, when snow was forecast for us here in S Glos just a few hours beforehand and it didn't happen.

    Please excuse the ramblings of a wet blanket. I really would be happy to be wrong on this, but I just ain't feeling it. sad.png

    Sorry to be a misery guts. sad.png

  2. I'm in the same boat in Exeter, it's like we've got a snow dome over us

    Every now and then, it will lift!

    I am Exeter born and bred (oh, I do miss the beautiful place cray.gif ).

    When I was born (February 1956) Exeter was under a prolonged blanket of snow, which froze and caused mayhem.

    Then there was 1963..........I don't need to say anything about that, just saying "1963" is enough!

    I can't speak for after 1972, as that is when I stupidly moved away.

    So, although these mega snow events are few and far between, they do happen.........and when they do, they are staggering and they will stay in your heart and mind for your whole life, just as 1963 and 2009/10 stay in mine. It will happen, at some point!

    Seeing The Beatles performing live at the ABC in Exeter in 1964 also stays in my mind as a "life event", but that's another story!

    I often wonder if the fact of being born during a mega snow event is what made me a snow-lover! cold.gifcrazy.gif

    I'll see if I can find a link for the 1956 event, give me a few minutes.

    Don't ever give up hope. acute.gif

  3. A huge black cloud has just appeared here. I wonder what it will bring?

    It would be nice to see some snow over the next few days, although I'm not holding my breath. A second lot of lying snow (after the big lot last month, which seems a long time ago!) would finish Winter off nicely.

    The more recent forecasts for snow showers/flurries seem to have come to nothing here.

    Ah, well, I look forward to the possibilities over the next week. Ever hopeful and all that.........cold.gif

    Peace and love to all. good.gif

  4. Seeing as it has been wet for the last 9 months, for the first time ever I am looking forward to Spring. Hopefully there will be some blue sky, some sunshine and some warmth.

    I am also looking forward to working in my new garden and seeing the plants that I planted on a rare dry day in October start to come into life.

    Blooming windy, blooming overcast and blooming miserable here today!

  5. Paul,

    It will take time for the science of climate change to catch up a bit with the PR abilities of the fossil fuel industry (they have to have a pretty good PR system to do the work they do!).

    But progress is being made. Other than the usual methods for spreading scientific knowledge (research papers, conferences, books, school curriculums, etc.) more and more scientists are finding themselves having to speak out about the dangers we face. They're doing more radio and magazine/newspaper interviews, conducting studies on the psychology of climate science and how best to portray it in the media, running blogs and websites with guides for all levels of understanding, getting involved in protests against pipeline plans and more. I doubt they will ever be able to match the strength and money of the fossil fuel and related industries PR machines though. I think the changing climate itself is the best PR piece for climate science, especially the cryosphere, where the changes have been so dramatic.

    So scientists in the fields related to climatology (and their respective organisations) are doing a lot on how better to present their work in the media, but it's something that science hasn't really had to face before, so it will take time.

    So you're generally just anti-science?

    Have millions of people not died because of AIDS? Did the dire warning not spurn masses of research and campaigns to better educate people to help prevent the disease spreading?

    I notice you never never responded to my post earlier. It seems as though you're unwilling to debate your position and just wish to jump in and state what your opinion is on occasion.

    I notice lots of accusations there with nothing to back it up too. Should we dismiss all research that isn't done in someones backyard? Should anyone that wants to be a researcher, as a career, instantly have there work dismissed? Do you not think its better to judge based on the content of their work, and dismiss it if it's riddled with errors and bias?

    No, I am not generally just anti-science.

    No, I do not know how many people have died from AIDS, but we were told that we were all at risk of dying from it. Seems like scaremongering to me.

    I made a point of saying that it had been interesting to read peoples' replies to my post.

    Unwilling to debate my position? Well, you are correct there, as I have no debating skills, but as a member of NW I am permitted to "jump in and state what my opinion is on occasion" as you put it. In the past, I got sick and tired of people making assumptions, accusations and generally misinterpreting what I had written practically every time I posted and it seems that little has changed here.

    Accusations with nothing to back it up? Re-read my post

  6. An odd choice there, Nog: HIV-AIDS wasn't even heard-of until the early 1980s and millions have died - and are still dying - in those parts of the world that remain unencumbered with scientific reasoning; those African countries where 'common sense' still prevails?

    Why is the message not getting across? is a question worthy of a proper explanation, IMO?

    I am happy to stand corrected! 1981 it appears to have been!

    But do you recall the public information things on the TV, the ones with the bananas and condoms (who could ever forget them!)? Honestly, they were enough to put the fear of God into a person.......we were practically all doomed. Weren't half of the world's population supposed to succumb?

    In my very humble opinion, the risk was vastly overstated.

  7. One of the purposes of the thread was to ask what more the scientific community can do to get its message out there, what mistakes it has maybe made in the past which can be learned from, and going on from there - if the anti-gw pr machine is so much better, why?

    The scientific community can start by not scaremongering and by being absolutely certain of their facts before they start issuing dire warnings.

    Since the 1970s, when scientists said millions upon millions of people were going to die from AIDS, there has has been scare after scare after scare. It doesn't seem as if any lessons have been learned.

    Why should we suddenly accept what they are saying now?

    I prefer to use my own common sense.

    There is also the matter of funding available for this politically "fashionable" issue. Crikey, I love gardening and gardening is a part of my employment. If my employer had seemingly unlimited funds to allow me to do more and more research into gardening, well, it would be tempting to milk it for all it's worth.

    Also, I think that these scientists are so wrapped up in their pursuit of proving that it is mankind's "fault" that they are blinkered to anything which doesn't fall in line with what they are aiming to prove. I have been on the receiving end of such blinkered-ness from a professor of paediatrics so I feel that I am qualified to make this statement.

  8. Hi Nogg's , hope you're well?

    As for "P.R."? I think the psychology of the 'denialist' has been so well explored that we should be looking at the psychiatric 'personality types' that are more readily associated with denialism and not the "P.R." issues (seeing as media seems to be firmly in the control of the 'Denialist' movement?

    I'm fine, thanks, Wolfie........I hope you are too. good.gif

    What do you think ought to be done with those whom you classify as "denialists"?

    From over here on my side, similar "accusations" (for want of a better word!) could be made about the "believers". cool.png

    It's been interesting to read peoples' responses to my view, but as has been said, both sides are so entrenched at the moment. I will probably have shuffled off my mortal coil before there is any definitive answer on whether mankind is responsible for climate change or whether it is natural processes/swings.

    PS I agree with Laserguy!

  9. There are those that want to turn a scientific truth into a political issue, of left/right/, liberal/conservative, pro-business/anti-industry and whatever else.

    I haven't been in here for ages, but thought I'd pop in!

    I was only thinking this morning about climate change. This would seem an appropriate point in which to re-iterate my personal view, for what it is worth.

    BFTV....you refer to a "scientific truth". But in the 1970s, scientists said we were heading for an ice age. In the 1990s we were going to have a Mediterranean climate. Current thinking seems to be that we will have more extreme weather.

    It's like the boy who cried wolf.....we haven't had an ice age and we do not have a Mediterranean climate. Why should I believe the current prognostications?

    My own view is that climate changes all by itself and not because of man's influence.

    smile.png

  10. I see the Met office lrf has changed again, trending back to a more colder outlook, Does anyone know what has changed, I thought the forecast was moving away from a colder Feb.

    There are similar rumblings in the Model Discussion thread, of a colder outlook again! Yum yum!

    It's cloudy here now and just a little snow is left, under hedges and on sunless shed roofs.

    A joyous moment for me is that the thaw has revealed that my daffodils have come up........only about an inch, but they are there! I planted them in November (in my new garden) and that is the first progress I have seen. Everything else I planted has been dormant, but my lovely daffodils have grown under all that snow. cray.gif

    biggrin.png

    PS Looking absolutely horrendous for the next 4 days, wih torrential rain. We haven't dried out from last year yet, the ground is still saturated and local fields are still flooded.

  11. Moderate wet snow here but not settling- in fact, it seems to be melting what had settled last night. No laying snow on pavements now, but still some on grass, shed roof etc. Has been snowing constantly since I got up at 7.30.

    Incidentally, does 'pitching' mean settling? I haven't heard the term before. Is it a south west term? I've only just moved here. I thought it might be a more meteorological term I didn't know, but my neighbour just used it and he certainly isn't particularly scientifically minded. (He asked me the other day which direction was north. I told him. He then asked me which direction was south).

    I grew up in Devon, where the snow "settled".

    I moved to Bristol, where the snow "pitched".

    It also "lays" in some places, I think!

  12. Which just goes to show that so polarised is the debate on GW that it is impossible to have a conversation about, “have our winters changed†without getting into a climate change debate. Indeed it would be peculiar if the debate didn’t go down that route.

    smile.png Your earlier response to my observations referred to AGW, but now you refer to GW without the A.

    Whilst I believe that the global temperature fluctuates, I do not ascribe the changes to anthropogenic causes.

    The A itself is only a small thing, just a letter in fact, but using that small thing makes a whole heap of difference when used in front of the other two letters: GW.

    I am just wanting to make my position clear.good.gif

    .........what happened to the climate change forum? Did it turn into a bearpit?

  13. Si. Certainly the last few years have not produced any memorable hot summer weather, though that’s not true worldwide and there were some very hot summers in the 90s and into the early 2000s, what we have seen is plenty of very wet summers. Noggin I too am a great believer in weather cycles and in AGW, what I don’t believe in is either or. In other words if it isn’t that then it must be this, that’s seems to be a rather naive view point although plenty on NW seems to buy into it on both sides of the debate. However let’s not get sidetracked by discussions that can be had in plenty on other areas of the site. So are winters getting worse or just reverting to a similar position pre the long spell of mild ones.

    Hang on.........smile.png I never mentioned the dreaded AGW and would like to make it clear that I do not believe in it.nonono.gif

    I just wanted to say how Februarys have changed in my lifetime!good.gif

  14. May I post my observations on the changing of Winters?

    I go back quite a long way (born in 1956) and my birthday is in February. I have had an avid interest in the weather since I was a young girl who insisted on going out to dance in the rain, much to my Mother's annoyance!

    My comments are for Februarys, as I have always particularly noted the weather on my birthday.

    As a child and teenager, there was nearly always snow, either falling or lying on the ground on my birthday.

    In my twenties/thirties, I was reduced to having frost on my birthday.

    In my forties....total rubbish...mild, damp dross.

    In my fifties....it seems to be reverting back to snow.

    I reckon it's all cycles. Cycles within cycles. Cycles within cycles within cycles.........

    .........and I am sure we understand only a little about how they inter-act.

    smiliz39.gif

    PS Hello, Wolfie.good.gif

×
×
  • Create New...