The Study probably states far more but this is what bugs me about current reporting - every strong weather event seems to be put down to manmade global warming. The quote that people will remember will be "Approximately 60%, and possibly even 70% of what we are seeing in the last decade can be attributed directly to greenhouse warming," he said, and the authors say that man-made climate change, which has increased the temperature of the sea surface, is the major factor behind the increase in numbers. No suggestion there - it's hard fact. The hot sea is just a superior fuel once a system has got going, surely. And a exceptionally busy season will surely stir up the seas and is nature's way of keeping those SSTs in balance from year to year. The technology we now have and are continuing to develop to detect these systems just gets more and more advanced and we have named systems in the last few years that only last a day or two before disappearing - there's no way these systems would have been detected just a few years ago so I'd agree with you all on that score. Last year's Atlantic hurricane season must have been so annoying for those reporters of doom predicting the end of the world. Strong shear and harsh conditions for systems to develop was pretty much the norm for the whole season, wasn't it. Perhaps that was the one-off rather than 2005?