Jump to content
Thunder?
Local
Radar
Hot?

Uncle_Barty

Members
  • Posts

    469
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Uncle_Barty

  1. Indeed John, there is some interpretation to suggest here that: models are being too progressive in the removal of the mean ridge to our east; and, the re-set of the tough aligned to our west is coming onto the horizon of some of the longer range modelling, which tends to agree with where relative angular momentum is and will likely be in next 2-3 weeks. That said, I wouldn't rule out the temporary ridge to our west as it agrees with a phase 0 GWO and MJO altough we are likely to see some attempt to build the ridge back to the east in the next 10 day period.

    Worth noting GFS 11-15 day ensemble mean builds the ridge back and ECM ensemble spread at t168 is moderate to large around the North Atlantic suggesting some degree of uncertainty about the modelling of the ridge.

    so are we still looking at sustained warmth after this blip and when will the warmth roughly begin?

    To be fair to John, the info is all in there, Geoff, and that is as much detail as one could possibly give.

  2. i cant vouch for the rest of your post but we are not in a deep solar minimum - Sunspots were present on over 85% of the days in 2010

    Agree - solar flux and sunspot levels are significantly above 'rock bottom' values, even if they are still well below the levels seen at recent (most 20th century) solar maxima.

  3. Oh my god, after all that from me yesterday about the trend of the HP being way too far South, and it continuing to do so. It's pushed North again!! and I and other people are in the firing line now.

    I cant believe it, i look like an idiot now. Maybe i need to stop been so hasty and learn how to read the blooming models better. I really am shocked, it's proved me so blooming wrong lol, 12 runs south 2 runs North. :|

    And that's why I always say that nothing is ever nailed on until it arrives. There was certainly a trend to move the high south over the BI and that might yet still happen! It's all down to specifics that are chopping and changing all the time. Personally I am using the model output as a guide, together with the valuable mutterings of GP et al.

  4. Well the model drama continues this morning with the UKMO the lone survivor amongst a sea of less than inspiring model output. I think the uncertainty will finally be over this evening as the model divergence starts quite early at 96hrs.

    To be honest, I don't think we can say the the uncertainty will ever be over until there is a huge pattern change and we lose the northern blocking/ -AO etc, ending up in a more 'normal' pattern... this being some weeks away I expect.

    The models have been flip-flopping all over the place for some weeks now and in all honesty I think we can only look at them for trends if anything beyond t+96 or so.

  5. i do not agree 2000 or 2001 snow band with thunder snow moved south even here in the southcoast we had an inch.

    i cant see why any where in the uk get snow showers.

    That thundersnow (28 Jan 04) came as a result of a very active cold front/line squall that came straight down from the north introducing arctic air for a day or two.

    A northerly airflow almost never delivers snow down here on the coast as the air is too dry by the time it gets here.

    I am expecting a few crisp cold dry days out of this before it turns less cold next week.

  6. The sun has been geomagmetically very quiet - the planetary A-index has not exceeded a value of 10 since the end of October.

    Personally I dont at all buy the theory that sunspot activity has much (if any) of an influence on our synoptic patterns. I can point to plenty of occasions when we have had all sorts of synoptic patterns with all sorts of sunspot and geomagnetic activity levels (the winter of 1981/2 occurred at a time of high sunspot activity and magnetic storms).

    Anyway, that's going a bit off-topic for this thread so I shall stop there!

×
×
  • Create New...