Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

johnholmes

Retired Pro Forecaster / Meteorologist
  • Posts

    22,978
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    84

Posts posted by johnholmes

  1. I suppose I will be talking to myself but comparing 06 to 00 at extended distances really is a waste of time. Compare like with like and you will get a better idea of where the particular model seems to be heading.

    I'm in the middle of doing my usual 500MB output, will post it before long but they seem to agree with the overall outlook of cold returning over the coming weekend, but with differences in how cold.

    re the how far north will any low get. Almost always IF the cold has been in place for 3 days or more then the initial modelling suggesting the Atlantic pushing the ridge/cold air away is very often too quick. The direction of travel of the depression at the surface and in the 3 dimension is fairly critical and is usually only seen accurately 24-48 hours out. Even then it can be several days before there is a real breakdown into genuinely milder gets there.


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/99706-model-output-discussion-into-2024/?do=findComment&comment=5003059
    • Like 4
    • Insightful 1
  2. 10 minutes ago, Ali1977 said:

    And by this won’t be factored in to any of the FI charts will it not, therefore ignore and concentrate on the medium range?? 

     

    19 minutes ago, Polar Maritime said:

    Still going up..

    pole10_nh.thumb.gif.bd70ab0f4c0807529e54e74892604037.gif

     

    Tends to support the idea of 'real' cold around 14 th, using the system I played around with 10-12 years ago. Only about 50% success though!


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/99706-model-output-discussion-into-2024/?do=findComment&comment=4997510
    • Like 3
  3. Saturday 6 January re 500 charts etc

    The ECMWF looks to show deeper cold air advecting south of the 500 and surface ridging  moving to around Iceland area. Date shown is 16 Jan, a week Tuesday! How long the upper ridge might last here is not clear as a largish upper trough is shown on the far nw of the EC chart.

    The NOAA 500 charts continue out to 8-14 with the upper ridge shown se-nw Greenland, the actual contour centre is about 55N 20W with the +ve height now shown as +390 DM over se Greenland on the 6-10 day chart. Similar on the 8-14, +ve is 270 DM. Upstream of this the pattern looks conducive to this probably extending some way beyond the 14 day period?

    This pattern has been consistently shown since about Xmas Day, obviously a developing set of charts but consistent in its direction and development. Just how long this pattern will last, how cold the UK will get, let alone will it snow is for the synoptic charts to gradually converge on what is likely.

    The UK surface and upper air only extend to the 12 th so obviously little of the above is on their public available charts.

    Given the consistency of the NOAA charts, now being picked up by ECMWF I would be surprised if deep cold was not being forecast by UK Met before next weekend! Egg on face possible!

    Usual charts below

    00_ECMWF_ENS_p0_500hPa+144_240.gif

    WWW.WEATHERCHARTS.ORG

    UK Met Office . . Europe and North Atlantic MSLP analysis and prognosis charts

     

     


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/99706-model-output-discussion-into-2024/?do=findComment&comment=4997528
    • Like 4
  4. Friday 15 Jan update using the upper air charts (500 MB chiefly)

    Taking ECMWF first and it has changed today from the last couple of days with both the upper and surface ridge shown as further NW than before. There is also in the last 2 days a signal for colder sir to advect west as the ridge conditions give way to a bit more cyclonic looking. 850 temperatures are brought down below -5 C in the last 2 charts. Is this a trend that will continue? Time will tell

    The NOAA charts for 6-10 especially have shifted the C of G of the ridge first east and now again more west. In the more westerly position the European trough is obviously further west thus allowing the possibility of colder upper air moving west. Currently the version yesterday showed the actual contour centre in the NW of the UK with the very high +ve anomaly (+390 DM) being just SW of Iceland. The UK is currently not in any deep cold air on the 6-10 or the 8-14, although this hint at temperatures falling somewhat at 500 MB.

    UK Met in the period 9-11 Jan ( their furthest public charts) show both the upper and surface ridge staying just north of northern Scotland. They have the European trough well east with a cut off upper low just south of the UK/nw France edging south over that period.

    So with all 3 outputs in the 6-10 day period seem to suggest no deep cold air but with upper and surface ridging being somewhere over or WNW of northern/western Scotland. This suggests a mainly dry spell with frost becoming more widespread but depending on cloud cover for its intensity. The upper pattern to me suggests little probability further out of any break down in the block. Obviously its actual position is going to vary slightly but remaining north rather than south. Models predicting further ahead do seem to suggest that deep cold is possibly 14-20 days away from today? Not my scene so that comment may be incorrect but I’ll leave that to others to firm up on.

    00_ECMWF_ENS_p0_500hPa+144_240.gif

    WWW.WEATHERCHARTS.ORG

    UK Met Office . . Europe and North Atlantic MSLP analysis and prognosis charts

     

     


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/99706-model-output-discussion-into-2024/?do=findComment&comment=4996040
    • Like 1
  5. 8 minutes ago, feb1991blizzard said:

    Do you think people tend to just look at uppers and not the 500-850mb profile enough John?, -8c with 540(ish) dam heights wont cut it in my opinion, and that is assuming its snow that does fall when there is precipitation which is far from certain.

    In the 'chase' for cold and snow,I do suspect this can be the case. But any prediction of ppn in any month that far ahead is often, say 2 out of 3 times, wrong for when/where/how much. That is often ignored in the hope for snow

     

    • Like 5
    • Thanks 1
  6. 1 hour ago, Turnedoutniceagain said:

    I'm still skeptical. I remember the great E'ly of Jan/Feb' 2006 - potentially an event to rival 1963 - a monster that literally disappeared from the charts with 36hrs to go. I'm still having counselling. 

    I love that comment, it is possible a fair number of other Net Wx coldies were also seeking help!

    Nothing, at upper level suggests anything is or will change from what I've been posting for several days. Quite why so many seem to be concentrating on T+240 or even 300h is beyond my understanding.

    The position of a surface high, with such solid evidence for where the upper ridge is likely to be has to be at least over the N'ern half of the UK or even further NW. Combined with the position of the Upper ridge and the subsequent development of the European trough over western Europe means that it will be cold with surface winds rather variable but probably, at least in the 4-6 day period from a NW-N'ly point and quite light. The amount of cloud is best followed by watching the Visual sat piccs over the UK area. Clear skies at night with relatively low daytime temperatures will slowly lead to overall dropping in daytime values.

    Turning to the S word then probably little chance other than the odd flurry in the above time frame. Beyond that then al look at the T-phi charts for your area will give some indication of any shower activity (unstable ascents). DO remember also to factor in the necessary additions to 'will it snow', 7-8 additional variables to IF the ascents show ppn is expected. Otherwise enjoy the colder weather and hopefully those of you badly affected by our recent 'monsoon' spell a chance for conditions to improve for you.

    Enjoy the count down and PLEASE be kind to each other. It could still go t--- up as 2006 demonstrated but that seems unlikely to me. I'll own up if it does and try and explain why!


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/99706-model-output-discussion-into-2024/?do=findComment&comment=4993329
    • Like 3
  7. 1 hour ago, BLAST FROM THE PAST said:

    Aren’t the green contour lines the important ones?  Get less pronounced as we go 8-14 days

     

    BFTP

    The 8-14 rarely shows as marked a response as the 6-10 does. But with both over the past week building the same pattern it would be most unusual if they turn out not to be what the 500 mb charts will actually show about 5-8 days from now and for 2 weeks or so. Don't ask me what happens after that but I would be surprised if the pattern is much altered for, stick my neck out, at least a 5-7 further days.


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/99706-model-output-discussion-into-2024/?do=findComment&comment=4991275
    • Thanks 1
    • Insightful 1
×
×
  • Create New...