Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

geordiekev

Members
  • Posts

    1,413
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by geordiekev

  1. 24 minutes ago, Kasim Awan said:

    Whilst these are great charts, they show a real lack of the convective wind speeds required for snow showers and low pressure structure required for trough development.

    Way too early to be discussing snow chances still, until a consensus is within the reliable. Hence, not too worried about interun variables just yet, as long as the macro pattern still looks peachy, I'm happy

    • Like 8
  2. 49 minutes ago, Allseasons-Si said:

    How many runs have we watched this count down?

    gfsnh-0-210.thumb.png.50d163f7425868c5ae76b732902d4e6e.png

    Yeah, was just thinking the same. Never has such a run in felt this long. To think it was 22nd Dec when tomorrows promising charts appeared & soon after became apparent a week long cool down was the order of the day.

    To see the goods within the T200 mark is nice to see. Only problem now is it's not just GFS providing the period of interest, so every model now having it's own interpretation for end of the week.

    Plenty of hope going around though

    gfsnh-0-192.png.9f8a6bb481729bf7c6de4693821c998b.png

    • Like 2
  3. 1 hour ago, northwestsnow said:

    Control looks good day 8

    image.thumb.png.c2b4af6872a6b6032f8cac9e26a30956.png

    Weren't similar outcomes still at t300 mark, till yesterday & suddenly jumped fwd a few days.

    Me I'm still happy to have a drying out period as has been modelled since Christmas & as ever the run in will always show options, good & bad.

    Feet still on ground until the concensus is decided upon, so will be an even more tense week but looking forward to crisp brighter skies in the meantime & see what kind of results these charts could produce 

    • Like 1
  4. 2 hours ago, Allseasons-Si said:

    And everyone was throwing the towels in by a few wobbly runs,pick them back up and wipe the sweat away...😄

    gfsnh-0-234.thumb.png.66733ff0e3c5f8387f727df947122f5a.png

    To see evolutions that appeared much later in the runs of recent, now getting within the D10s is quite something. 

    From La La Land to ooh la la. Ofcourse now it's within the cross hairs of all models, expect swings both ways, so best not get too excited or despondent.

    The 0z GFS this week, bar 1,  I believe, all had spoiler lows preventing the Pacific/Greeny Highs, so would love to know why that is. Hence, I've been reviewing the full day of runs, rather than 1 timeset & good to see the outcome I'd prefer, just for the rarity value, now modelled slightly sooner.

    image.thumb.png.46c9b887cd677707459669a3e6c6d7ec.png

    • Like 3
  5. 3 hours ago, TEITS said:

    Going to be honest I am disappointed with the commentary on here these past 24hrs. So much so I couldn't be bothered to post.

    Lets begin by saying some of the model output these past 24hrs has been sensational and you could not draw any better charts for the UK. I would even go as far to say the best cold weather output I have seen. So when the bar has been set so high you are bound to see less impressive runs. However even the less impressive runs will deliver what many seek.

    The GEFS/ECM mean continue to be fantastic, especially the ECM.

    image.thumb.png.c3a3a08b96bd0f5035389c43935f84e7.pngimage.thumb.png.d6395c7fab59529778eedb51c282f3d2.png

    Some people have been referring to a W based NAO. The ECM mean at +240 does the opposite as to me a W based NAO is when the blocking backs W and allows SW,lys via atlantic low pressure systems moving in. The ECM mean is extending the block even further S. The ECM even causes a low pressure in the Atlantic to move W!!

    Lets also not forget the argument that all cold spells downgrade is flawed. Even recently some were suggesting the GFS would be right and we wouldn't even have an E,ly next week as low pressure was supposed to track NE into Iceland and our HP sinking over the UK.

    Moving onwards and at the moment even the transitional phase from the E,ly to a Greenland block is uncertain with regards to timing and detail and won't be resolved for another 72hrs. I could spend all day typing out various scenarios  beyond this for mid Jan onwards.

    Overall a wintry outlook is most likely but could this be a convective N,ly or Bitter convective ENE,ly or will low pressure approach from the SW bringing a blizzard to some locations. Another option is low pressure in the atlantic phasing with the low that is moving S from the arctic, enhancing the bitter flow from the ENE.

    Worth remembering that till today we only had GFS to model the 2nd cherry 🍒 & GH evolution, which is now appearing on the D10s, so now we can start looking for concensus.

    If this morning anything to go by,  suggest some find another hobby

    image.thumb.png.d6395c7fab59529778eedb51c282f3d2.png

    image.thumb.png.c3a3a08b96bd0f5035389c43935f84e7.png

    • Like 3
  6. 1 hour ago, Cheshire Freeze said:

    Just a note, it’s perfectly plausible this goes west based because all winter the strat warming has been focussed towards Canada.

     West based solutions dont just come out of nowhere though, they evolve so at what T do you think that may be, serious Q? T420, way beyond FI, so a little bit too much emphasis, trying to go beyond the 2 week mark. 

    Let's get the first blocks in 

     

    • Like 1
  7. 8 minutes ago, IrelandWeather said:

    I thought I was understanding this west based -NAO more this week from reading posts about it but clearly I'm still stumped clearly!

    If you have time can you explain why the GFS 12z FI isn't an example of west-based? Say Day 9/10 onwards. High migrates NW to Greenland, but it doesn't stop there and continually moves westward towards Canada (maybe moves is the wrong word, it's clearly weakening/draining away as it pulls towards Canada rather than a strong block moving west). It ends up with SW'lys by the end of the run. 

    Perhaps others commenting about west-based -NAO, when it is in fact not being shown on any runs, have also confused what it is like me, in the sense of interpreting what I outlined above from the GFS 12z as being an example of it? I'm a novice so literally thought it meant the HP moves westwards towards Canada! TY in advance if you do shed some light on it.

    Yeah March last year was good example. It pivoted so far West I was actually viewing models on their sides to see where the cold was going. Not there at the moment but is certainly 1 of many outcomes but let's get the Greeny high in reliable first

    Screenshot_20240104_204648_Gallery.jpg

    Screenshot_20240103_224923_Gallery.jpg

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 2
    • Insightful 1
  8. 18 minutes ago, Catacol said:

    Yep. There are some extremely half empty comments in here this evening. This is EC 240

    image.thumb.png.f596acf4e1a1ea0842add44df7a2d7d0.png

    Strong block, southerly displaced jet, shattered vortex with the main remnants over Asia, flow over the U.K.  north of east following around a week of steadily falling temperatures. As an overall pattern what more do folk wish to see?

    Could be a good time to bring back the 72h thread, for those afraid to dream

    • Like 6
  9. 27 minutes ago, northwestsnow said:

    Week  beginning15th 

     

    image.thumb.png.c5533500cdf9970b5f9499be9e195346.png

    image.thumb.png.4b83e02ade035fd5772a0ea9dd0925c1.png

    Think the EC46 called this blocking spell a while back & to be fair GFS had a mean way back on 22nd Dec, at T384, almost identical to the det 12 days later (yesterday).

    Quite astounding & a reminder GFS can be useful for trends at the far reaches, just it normally drops them soon after

    Screenshot_20240103_220400_Gallery.jpg

    Screenshot_20240103_215450_Chrome.jpg

    • Like 7
  10. 7 hours ago, offerman said:

    image.thumb.png.30223d8b6b77a4c555001af7d8c7414f.png

    this chart for me is the absolute pinnacle if this could verify.

    Decided to catch much needed nap between 0z & work but the ECM d10 is high risk/reward. As I mentioned last night. 8th March '23 had great synoptics but did go too west based, so we ended up at wrong receiving end of the bitterly cold flow per below.

    However, the signals are all favourable atm so would have to get v unlucky again if we ended up with such a good looking pattern but a few miles made it a UK bust.

    Looking fwd to this arvos for sure

    Screenshot_20240103_224923_Gallery.jpg

    • Like 3
  11. 3 minutes ago, Battleground Snow said:

    Yeh hopefully an outlier, but it will probably still get there at day 12.

    Ukmo at 168 looks good too

    ukmonh-0-168 (13).png

    They are missing the propping lows, been the same last 3 0zs. Hence need to compare 0z to 0z, 18z to 18z. Oddity indeed

     

    This one I've been banging drum is uber important to squeeze the vortex limb & aid the WAA tilt

    Screenshot_20240102_051253_Chrome.jpg

    IMG_8261.png.82a14712a111857ef73ef8d74ca12518.png

    • Like 1
  12. 8 minutes ago, feb1991blizzard said:

    The GFS hasn't kicked in yet though, a slow moving shortwave on the southern tip of Greenland is delaying things.

    It's the 0z, seems to like to produce shortwaves at tips for some odd reason

     Must be 3rd day in row it has but was on both Pacific & Greeny side last 2 days

    Screenshot_20240104_043328_Chrome.jpg

    Screenshot_20240104_043345_Chrome.jpg

    Screenshot_20240102_051253_Chrome.jpg

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Insightful 2
  13. 1 minute ago, Kasim Awan said:

    The first few flakes?

    Sunday

    Temperatures gradually reducing from supporting snow only >400m early on Sunday afternoon to scattered cooled pockets of ground level snow line due to surface cooling by late allowing some of the rogue flurries to fall as sleet / wet snow >50miles inland where showers interact with surface cold, where this cooling does not occur due to cloud etc rain/sleet more likely. Freezing levels around 500m with significant surface warming in the east initially leading to high wet bulb driven melting widely.

    Sunday night looks to bring a tight NNE wind which may produce a Kent clipper which would either be full snow or marginal dependent on depth of surface cold modulated by uppers influencing freezing level and wind speed which affect surface dew point layer. Stronger winds are an issue here. Potential for something interesting if it coincides with a cold sector and lightish winds as seen on ICON again which drops off uppers quickly into Monday early hours. -7/-9 850hpa core required so only a 25/30% chance as per current modelling. Combined with evaporative cooling could allow temporary ground level snow lines near the coast Kent etc. Also depends on this NNE wind being retained on output. Localized 2-6cm possible under best case scenario.

    Monday

    On Monday soundings improve where a 400m asl freezing level is enough in low dew point surface air 20-30 miles inland North of Essex for nocturnal wet snow showers and accumulation at night depends on precipitation though with daytime mixed wet precipitation. Nearer sea the long wind fetch North of Essex likely to result in near coastal warm layers. Few spots perhaps seeing a dusting at night Midlands Pennines East Wales.

    Note less precip in SE later Monday but also lower dew points so more likely to fall as snow near to coast Essex South so any rogue flurries will probably be a greater snow to rain ratio than further North.

    Bar the potential Kent clipper and perhaps some more organised very light precip Sunday night this is really only the odd shower. These will occur *as long as 500mb heights are kept below 556hpa*. Even if nothing appears on high res.

    My snow sense is a bit rusty for obvious reasons.

    Kasim ❄👍

    Was hoping you'd be getting the crayons out soon. Still a few runs to get real excited but good to see your ❄️ prospects out of the loft 👍

    • Like 3
  14. 2 minutes ago, Ice Day said:

    I'm not sure I've seen a chart as bizarre as this before!?  The whole PV shifted to the Asia/Europe side.

    image.thumb.png.572dab91f4c670c5f262c68df0974ced.png image.thumb.png.092b0daa6bb144d33e15b5ea146f0f6f.png

    Slower evolution, but let's get real, it's absolutely sensational!
     

    Not too dissimilar to what we had in March last year. Unfortunately the undercut on that occassion, per the norm managed to spoil it due to too West based, so still staying grounded till consensus & within D5.

    Expect variations for a few runs yet

    Screenshot_20240103_224923_Gallery.jpg

    • Like 4
×
×
  • Create New...