Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

nsrobins

Members
  • Posts

    1,030
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by nsrobins

  1. A bit of south Caprock Magic might be the play today as an upslope regime prevails ahead of the slowly advancing cold front.

    Shear and instability don't look very well positioned but my preference would be the cusp of the DL bulge where inhibition erodes enough to release the 1800+ CAPE later on. Also sharply backing surface winds riding into the extended trough feature here.
    So down to the I80 for me around Abilene, TX although this might be a bit too far SW depending on recovery and DL incursion.

     

    Edit: A bit of time to kill while my prawn noodles mature takes me into the HRRR (09Z run) and I see it wants to develop some sturdy looking cells a bit further east around Albany/Breckenridge by 21Z. I'm going to call it's bluff because I don't think the DL will get far enough east and I'll stick with Abilene but Stamford on the I277 would give you options either way.
     

    Key:

    Bold type - primary target

    Italic bold - secondary should the primary fail which is likely

    underline - tertiary target in the almost certain eventuality that the secondary target is as wrong as the primary 

     

    PS: CAP should not be as much of a problem as last night

  2. Internet fixed. Contractors cut through a main cable near Portsmouth and two whole postcode areas were down for over 24 hours. Ouch.

     

    The DL has got into the central OK Panhandle and to about AMA. Max surface flow from the ESE seems to be focussed on this area with a Cu field on latest sat.Not a huge evening in store but potential for some decent structure and hail at least between 22Z and 02Z Weds.

  3. Not questioning the data and synopsis from NWS, but from the numerous footage clips and reports I've seen I have to ask 'when is a multi-vortex, cyclic ground-level mesocyclone a tornado proper?' I don't think it spent too much of it's life as a contiguous mainly single-circulation tube but rather a ragged system of spin-ups and threaded vortices. Very violent agreed, but does that maximum width really reflect a large wedge or as I say the maximum extent of the rapidly cycling multiple areas of spin within the main meso.

    Discuss.

  4. I'm 'internetus-interuptus' at home due to the inadequacies of Virgin Media, but a quick look during lunchtime at work reveals some decent recovery in moisture across the risk area today. Coupled with very high temps this generates 3000+ CAPE in an area that extends into the panhandle. Backed ESE flow into the DL region promises to generate convection, and although RAP initiates a cell or two in C OK, I'd be sitting just NE of the broad low centre around Liberal, KS 

     

    Good luck and I'll look forward to seeing what happened in the morning Posted Image

  5. Missed last night as no internet at home - finally got through to the Mumbai call centre after holding for 25 minutes to be told there are 19 engineers working on a fault in our postcode area - estimated repair time 60 hours LOL. Time to start a new book.

     

    An increased risk IMO for this afternoon in an area not far from where you were yesterday.

  6. This article was written before news of Tim Samaras, his son and Carl Young filtered through. Although is contains some opinions I am not in agreement with, it also has many links to doppler grabs, Storm chaser locations, media footage, etc that you may see individually dotted about but not in one place.

     

    Spoiler alert: Read the comments with an open mind

     

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2013/06/01/the-night-that-should-change-tornado-actions-and-storm-chasing-forever/

     

  7. Thanks Tom. Hope you are all in reasonable spirits after the weekend's events.

    A quick shuffle through models and obs would take me North to Guymon/Boise, OK for some high-based structure. Moisture is OKish. This would put you in position (SC KS) for Tues.
     

  8. Thanks Coast. I have always understood the NWS advice is to stay at home and shelter as the article states, because of exactly what happened on Friday with numerous people trying to flee the area in a short space of time and jamming the roads.If there's one thing that should be investigated about this event, it's the instruction from local media to evacuate the El Reno area. I'm sure this did not come from the NWS and it's only a by chance that the tornado didn't develop like it could have done. The casualty numbers may have been horrific if it had.

  9. Following the dramatic and tragic events of Friday, May 31st, 2013 when a violent tornado developed and moved erratically across portions of C OK, I thought it might be worth discussing this in more detail as the nature and motion of the core circulation, coupled with the horrendous traffic chaos caused by rather precipitous broadcasts from local media advising people to evacuate the area and head south, led to several direct encounters and as we know the tragic loss of three respected members of the storm research community.

    The following graphic is a provisional tornado track map, clearly showing the sharp turn north of the first vortex as it crossed the I81 4 miles south of El Reno:

    Posted Image

    The gridded road network on and east of the I81 at this point was clogged with a mix of terrified members of the public attempting to evacuate the area and several dozen storm chasing vehicles, many of whom were caught out by unusual nature of the multi-vortex tornado and the deviant sharp left turn as it crossed the highway.

    I, and others I'm sure, would like to know more about why the storm behaved in this way, and perhaps learn for the future. Despite the awful events of Friday, there is no doubt that had the tornado continued to develop into a long-lived violent wedge east of El Reno, the casualty numbers would of certainly been much higher as the I40 and surrouding roads were gridlocked.

  10. Only a matter of time before the storm-chase tourists get caught like this.

    Seems to me there rather too much hazard involved in tearing about to vantage points to photo-video these storms.They are just too unpredictable to do this in complete safety and competitive tour guides have too much incentive to take risks.Sooner or later there'll probably be a multi-vehicle smash involving competing groups.

    Tim and his team should not be confused with the Yahoos. The debate about the increasing recklessness of chasers has been coming for a while, but this tragic incident should not be perceived as one involving weather tourists or those who choose to take a risk too far for that ultimate video of photo. Yes they were undoubtedly in the field on Friday evening, and were as caught out as all of us by the deviant jog North of the main core, but Tim and his team were not risk takers.

    • Like 6
  11. Tim was a leading figure in tornado research, his work being featured in many publications and on the Discovery Channel. I remember several instances when Tim and his team stopped to help victims of tornados in the field.

    My thoughts go to Tim's family, friends and the many storm chasers who had the pleasure of meeting him.

    RIP.

  12. A more relaxed or down day today after the events of yesterday.

    Conditional risk of structure and hail with a 2% tornado risk exists in the Arkalatex region. OFB induced cells are likely in the Mount Pleasant - Texarkana region just south of the Red River so a trip may be worth it.

    It may not be worth creeping into Arkansas for this one. Personally I'd only venture into the moonshine stills and log cabins for a moderate risk. LOL.

  13. When all is said and done, and not withstanding the tragic loss of life from this storm, I believe Oklahoma City has once again dodged the bullet. From what I was seeing last night the majority of the damage being done from the I40 through to Norman was from either 70mph+ range inflow or 90mph+ RFD straight line winds, and perhaps some rotational vectors as the organised mesos touched the surface. Enough to turn vehicles and down power lines, but not tornadic per say.
    The fact that there were so many areas of rotation probably saved the city from catastrophic damage in that one meso didn't become dominant over the others for long enough to tighten up into a significant vortex.
    Just as well - some of the mid-level couplets were high end - and if one tornado had dominated, the results don't bear thinking about.

     

    So, when all else looks equal, why does one supercell drop a long-tracked EF5, and another spawn multiple EF1/2 tornados? Just one of the many mysteries that have yet to be defined, but one that IMO saved the urban areas of OKC from an historic night.
     

  14. A total mess to be honest. Multiple re-cycling circulations, 100mph+ RFDs, very complex cell tracking ESE into more favourable parameters.

    Hard to tell if power flashes are directly tornadic or inflow or RFD.

     

    Great to hear you're OK Tom. Maybe time to bug out south for a while then assess I40 area for assistance as multiple reports of damage along that corridor.

     

×
×
  • Create New...