Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

su rui ke

Members
  • Posts

    223
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by su rui ke

  1. It matters not what we may think or post-myself I think its a near call, but he will say it fully vindicated his prediction.

    What amuses me is on the one hand he slates the Met O every time he is interviewed or does one of his comic videos, but at the same time quotes their short range or warnings as vindication of his forecasts.

    Bloke is an eccentric-we should just accept it, he gets near sometimes, about 70% is not even close, just leave him to the daily tripe to print his fairy tales.

    I would close the thread but I suppose it allows some discussion of the weather with Piers as a side show.

    Yes, but that's the whole point - he's not a harmless eccentric. He gets quoted in the general media as a 'leading meteorologist', which means that when his forecasts are wrong most of the public just puts it down to 'them' getting it wrong again. He also uses his forecasts (and the wider media) to pursue his anti-Met Office agenda. For those reasons, his forecasts deserve close scrutiny.

  2. Oh dear - there was a full-page article in today's Sunday Post about 'leading meteorologist' PC. It was a pretty rubbish, sensationalist article consisting mostly of quotes from our man, none of which, of course, were challenged. The worst bit was that he supposedly correctly forecast the windspeeds in last Tuesday's storm (which the poor old Met Office didn't naturally). Now, there isn't much wriggle room in this statement so, if he didn't make such a forecast, he really shouldn't be allowed to get away with this one. Did anyone see this forecast?

    Oh, by the way, the main point of the article was that there is 'worse to come' this month - storms that is, and these mostly in the south. So, I hope you guys down there are ready!

  3. Certainly seems like 59mph sustained winds here - probably just past the peak wind at the moment. I would consult my anemometer but its location is sheltered by the house to southwesterly winds so I think today's maximum gust on it was about 40mph (103mph maximum ever recorded during the late March northerly storm last year). No power cut here so far. Anyway, the main band of precipitation is hitting central Scotland at the moment and seems to be a mix of rain, sleet and hail. Last time I looked, it was 5.1/2.1 but it was dropping quickly from the day's maximum of 7.8C.

    Thanks, LS - and BleakMidwinter. That's a mid force 10 then. I don't think it's quite as bad as that here!

  4. Well I still think it is tosh to boast that weather and climate can be predicted accurately 100 years from now. I suppose they could be called Mystic Megs or charlatans.

    It is the science of useless predictions which is not in fact science as it is based on assumptions and guesswork. It is not science.

    No, it is scientific to produce predictions, based on the best understanding of the atmosphere that we have, and including error bands - which is what the IPCC does. Anyone who does say that they can predict what the global average temperature is going to be in 2064, or whenever, is probably a charlatan - we won't know how good a fortune-teller they might be until the time arrives.

    Saying that the predictions are pointless because we don't know what future emissions of CO2 are going to be also, well, misses the point. As has been said, there are different scenarios produced by the IPCC based on different possible levels of emissions, the whole idea behind which is to allow policymakers to make decisions. No-one is saying that CO2 levels in such and such a year are definitely going to be at such and such a level. Also by arguing this (that the prediction cannot be made) you are implicitly admitting the connection between CO2 emissions and temperature rise.

  5. If all the Gulf Stream does is slightly warm the waters around us, why are we 20C or so warmer than Moscow in the winter...?

    We are warmer because we are on the eastern side of an ocean. Most of the air that reaches us has to cross that ocean and warms up by the time it gets here. That in itself is more important than the existence of the Gulf Stream - the Gulf Stream makes the water slightly warmer than it would otherwise have been but it is not the most important factor affecting our winters. Remember the Gulf Stream also passes close to Newfoundland!

  6. Because it proves the suns is behaving unusual and has been for the last 3 - 4 years and thus there's a strong coleration between weak sun activity and cold periods throughout our climate history the last little ice age was akin down to the solar cycle failling to produce sunspots knwon as the Maunder Minimum. So if it's true what's happening now people would fail to acknowledge it because it contradicts global warming completely.

    The article you posted a link to claims global temperatures have dropped by 0.7C since 2007. The global average temperature anomaly for 2007 that I have is 0.55 and (so far) for this year it is 0.67. The 30-year running averages for those two years are 0.33 and 0.38, respectively.

    I do not, therefore, have any problem in acknowledging the recent lack of sunspots and still thinking that the global temperatures are rising.

  7. A lot of credible sources state that the world reached the peak oil production this year. Peak Coal is apparently scheduled to be reached in 2011. Peak natural gas is scheduled (by some) to be in around 2025.

    That might be correct for oil - although all of these things are very hard to predict. I think there is still 'a lot' of coal down there though and would be very surprised if production is anywhere near a peak. Whether you would want to burn it all though is another question.

  8. It doesn't seem obvious, it all depends on where the HP ends up. As long as it is close by we don't need "new" cold air. So something of a hiatus for the next 4-5 days. Time to go back to watching models I think...

    Was just watching the BBC and they are still going for the possibility of -20 somewhere this weekend so it looks like they are favouring the 'local cold is enough' option for now.

  9. Theres no doubt about that SRK.

    Right on top of us , probably cold and dry in the immediate short-term. We'd keep the snow cover and depending on how much cloud is wrapped up in it, then we could test some low tempeartures in the interior.

    If it sat to the east/north-east of us, then probably bringing a moderated north-sea influence. Depends on the uppers and the cold at the source (Norway, Denmark, Low-countries ?) - but most likely we could end up with a chilly rather than outright cold fetch to the east coast. Immediate east-coast could get some mushing up of existing snow but still with the majority of us holding onto most of it.

    Unless we get a direct cold-fetch/good cold uppers though, we're likely to see any High in our immediate proximity begin to mix-in some atlantic/north-sea air over time, so thats got to be a moderating influence I'd think.

    Thanks, BT. So there's likely to be a trend towards less cold wherever the high is?

  10. To pick up on what Snowplough was saying, for quite a few runs now the GFS has been wanting to let warmer air into the developing high over the weekend. However, the other models have the high slighly further north and keep us in an easterly. Presumably that would see the cold continuing? Could a slight change in the position of the high make all the difference?

  11. 'Britain' is frozen apparently. Oh wait, they mean SE England. The world revolves around London, just like it always has and always will.

    I get seriously racked off when perfectly good posts get trashed by some pathetic trolling software. Grow up netweather.

    -2.8/-5.5; more overnight snow and looking a bit dicey out here.

    Indeed, the world. Yesterday the BBC started stringing together stories about cold weather in mainland Europe, N. America and Asia. If it hadn't snowed in (or near) London, they would have ignored what was happening anywhere else!

×
×
  • Create New...