Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Ice BIast

Members
  • Posts

    173
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ice BIast

  1. To be honest RJS, many people on here are probably just talking about other forecasts more because of a cold January being forecast, which many prefer over a cold February, so everyone is focusing on these forecasts, at least for now. I for one rate your forecasts very highly though, and I'm sure that many others see you among the top long range forecasters too.
  2. Indeed this is a problem. I just think though that GP's forecast shouldn't be called "a bust", as he forecasted the general pattern well, and for anyone to expect him to forecast things down to fine detail from at least a couple of weeks away is just silly. Remember that just a tiny shortwave made a big difference to our weather during the height rises to the NE, something that cannot be forecast by any long range forecaster.
  3. GP's Dec forecast looks OK to me, his forecast for 500HPa heights fits the actual anomaly for December so far... http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/tmp/composites/compday.90.201.160.178.358.2.18.32.gif
  4. Let's hope so. The MJO isn't doing us any favours currently, sticking around phase 3 for a while yet.
  5. The warming clearly looks happy about what it's done on that run, it's grinning at us! Seriously though, if a warming were to happen, then how much time lag would there be in this case before we start seeing tropospheric impact?
  6. Wave 1 activity is forecast to increase again to 1400 at day 10. Looks like the vortex wont be able to relax for a while!
  7. I found this 30 HPa chart interesting. As well as showing the main part of the PV moving towards Siberia, it also shows a lobe of PV near Iceland, tracking quickly east. Once this lobe has cleared east, towards Scandinavia, that would open the door for height rises to the NW would it not?
  8. So great runs this morning. However, comparing the ECM to yesterdays 12Z, the high over western Russia is further south, which means that any easterly would be sourced from a more SErly direction. Also, the troughing over Europe is getting modelled further North every run, and we don't want it to be any further north than it is as it would prevent an Easterly airflow and also disrupt the Scandi high.
  9. You're probably right because before other cold spells, when the GFS and UKMO finally agreed on something, the ECM always changed its mind at the same time to something milder. Lets hope that today will be an exception.
  10. Wow brilliant runs this morning, showing some great synoptics. Now its the GFS, ECM, JMA, and GEM vs the UKMO and NOGAPS, so looking good. The only way it could improve IMO is to have better cold pooling to the east. Then it really would be perfect.
  11. Agreed, and the high near the UK is postioned differently ridging NW rather than NE, so a bit different to the ECM and UKMO. Could be a good run this.
  12. Another point to add is that the PV looks a lot different at T240. There certainly doesn't appear to be a strong signal from the ENS for the PV to be moving over Greenland like on the operational.
  13. Well the ECM ENS mean at T168 looks a bit better than the operational - a bit further west.
  14. The PV really bigs up at T216, so the high just gets bulldozed out of the way.
  15. ....That is ridiculously good! Plenty of very cold runs there. Frosty's animation is perfect for this situation.
  16. I wouldn't be too saddened by the ECM run. Can't complain with that.
  17. The BOM could be a useful tool tonight. It looks similar to the UKMO at T144, so it will be interesting to see where it goes beyond this.
×
×
  • Create New...