Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Hatewarmth

Members
  • Posts

    99
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hatewarmth

  1. 59 minutes ago, Metwatch said:

    24th January 2021 event is probably the most notable one I know of in recent years that trended north last minute, ended up stalling over Derbyshire and there was up to 7-8 inches in a few spots, got about 3 inches here. I think more often than not they trend south slightly but not always. Interesting to track and monitor what Thursday's system will do regardless from a meteorological point of view.

    This is why I highlight the word tend. I hope I’m wrong but this is what make this forum great. Opinion

  2. 4 minutes ago, Met4Cast said:

    Personally I’d be surprised if the low reaches the UK at all - Could easily see this sliding into France with the northern extent perhaps grazing the south coast. 

    Would mean heavy snow showers packing in from the east..

    Sadly I have to agree with this. In my experience as we get closer to T + 0 these system TEND to track further south. My feeling is most of the setting snow with come from showers or steamers coming in from the north east driven by the relatively warm north sea.

     

    Dont have the understanding of charts but have followed this forum for many years and I’m middle aged let say so I’ve seen it all from the traditional white Xmas of 79 to the crap of most years since the mid 80’s lol 🙂

    • Like 3
  3. 4 minutes ago, Ali1977 said:

    It’s 2 weeks ago, and easterly wind like that will definitely have snow showers associated with it if that’s what happened - great chart for snow 

    Totally agree with this. We should not be looking at charts past 5 to 7 days at the most only for fun. Remember the models are getting this wrong at 48 hours. For precipitation we should stick to the high res models and even then they will change as the fronts hit land.

     

    Is it just me or do most get the snow when it’s NOT forecast more than when it is. I personally think this is because atmospheric pressure can alter the track of low pressure systems and fronts as it get near to landfall. Sorry if slightly off topic but feel it’s relevant as it proves that models can’t take into account anything that’s on the ground. The biggest example is hills. Not sure what other people’s thoughts are on this 🙂

    • Like 4
  4. 6 hours ago, That ECM said:

    He’s talking about the pv purple blob leaving the nw and going east. Therefore giving opportunities for heights to build nw and the jet stream being less strong. Here are the gefs mean from 06z and 12z you can see that more of the pv is east on this run. Worth looking at future runs to see if this becomes a trend.  

     

    There are some brilliant areas within this site to aide learning. I would encourage looking as this hobby is far more enjoyable when you start to get handle on what the charts are showing.

    970E7048-B999-4C6B-9BBF-3CFA0E87B0A6.png

    AD9DFAFA-D67F-43FE-B67F-1D67E6E46564.png

    Thanks.  This is really helpful

    • Thanks 1
  5. 18 minutes ago, jon snow said:

    Hello and merry 27th Dec.. nah that’s just wrong innit?… …anyhoo, I fear  this winters hopes for coldies are only ever going to exist inside a Gfs 6z op computer.. .. perpetually in deep FI…. .. hope I’m wrong but you know, I’m a realist..or am I just a crazy person??..   ! …anyway cheers.. …wots new?..hiccup… roll on winter.. Ja ich bin ein Zyniker..I’m a cynic Ja Ja.. I’m also a drunkard..ps.. I cannae wait for the 12z..oh puleasse.. give me a break!!!!!  ❄️  

    F36E86DA-D7E7-4AF2-95E7-0A941708C6AA.thumb.png.79610855e9396805852f37130d4994e7.png31E8E2FB-73C5-49F7-9CFC-C07247596338.thumb.png.0d7aa2eaea20194a075097d696a3c223.png80D84AD1-BDF2-4038-8CCB-D490AE1B11C5.thumb.jpeg.bd7ef1aa75b732c9efe1a8f98c3e85cb.jpeg7A155F39-3BEF-4EA2-95FC-801EED9AE29F.thumb.jpeg.95a0e1d6e28b87730adce0733e82dd5a.jpeg0FDA6FE7-5EC8-46AD-906F-28B14D474A23.thumb.gif.6448c8a71f1d3a8897cb2f27ec578d42.gif0786AA8C-802D-4A35-9D08-7CEFF6B40804.thumb.png.888d4572c94b1c1d7e797209fbe35049.png

     

    Really sorry but I just don’t understand your post.  Cxx as n you explain why it’s relevant in this threads plz.  Many thanks

    • Like 9
  6. 4 hours ago, Bradley in Kent said:

    Hello all and Merry Christmas

    To follow some post-mortem analysis of the cold spell that never was, I'll attach a set of diverging ensembles from 10 days ago posted by @met4cast which summed up where we were. I also made the point on how in winter it's best to go by the top 3 mild options as they are the most likely outcomes.

    Basically the 21st was the fork in the path where this time (like most times) it ended up mild; in fact, there's a chance that the actual outcome will be even warmer than the warmest member!

    Oh well, I've the mindset of 'if it can't be cold it might as well be warm'...

    ens_image_php.png.0600793806959d5213dc2960100faf58.png

    I think the most significant thing to note regarding this chart was how early the divergence was.  FI was litter ally 3 to 4 days at the most.  The models did not have a clue.  I think people thought that because of all the HLB that it would have to go the way of cold but sadly it didn’t.  There are signs for temps to drop around the 4th but way to far out.  People must remember the golden rule.  DO NOT could you chickens until it’s inside 72hrs and the 3 main models need to agree

  7. 2 hours ago, Premier Neige said:

    Is it the gfs that has the habit of picking up a signal, then dropping it only to return to it later or am I thinking of a different model?

    Your exactly right.  This is what’s been going through my head this morning.  
     

    To much doom and gloom on here given the positive signals AND positive start to the season.  We not even in December yet

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...