Hello Mondy You can count me in as a sceptic, as half of the supposed science would not conform to normal scientific standards. One minor thing regarding parametric modelling for calculating climate change, You have to have all the know variables loaded into the model, not just the ones that suit your cause, I have used very expensive and powerful unix systems for full FEA modelling and the standard is to run at-least three times, for numerical anomalies, and this is on the same system as used buy Boeing, Nasa ECT and they all accept that it is not an exact science, and from reading the way this climate modelling was programmed there was there a CPK undertaken on the programme before the main run???? Sorry to sound so blunt but if an employee of mine came to me with such a poorly executed piece of research when half of the potential parameters were missing i would not be impressed, there is just to much IF on a singular component.