Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Downburst

Members
  • Posts

    1,193
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Downburst

  1. 3 hours ago, Spah1 said:

    IMG_7304.thumb.png.759062ef2c3ae2806ef7f16d629a5e6d.png

    Can someone send me a link to learn about how to read these type of charts pls. 

    MJO

     

    Tropics, starting in Indian Ocean and eastward movement of rain across the pacific (storms, with a lot of convection) occurs usually. This moved from the west to the east over time. It can be strong or weak and this can be measured. It can move fast or slower and again this can be measured.

    What we measure?

    The tops of the clouds at 200mb and the bottom layer at 850 pressure. This helps understand the strength of disruption. One can analyse previous pressure patterns (to pick one constant for this guide) and consider given the base state, for instance ENSO state what happened previously when the MJO was in this phase? One can then expect with certain probabilities that the atmosphere will react favourably to the way it has in the past. This is sometimes usefully shown in Composite pressure maps for the planet.

    image.thumb.png.1115e6c3d10347669920bef55f3f530b.png

     

    Recent forecasts have shown that as December progresses we can expect a possible Phase 7 to 8 transition at some amplitude (strength) and the composite pressure maps would suggest possible high level blocking in north Atlantic/arctic. Hence the interest. At the same time a low amplitude or not getting into these phases in time will not have any effect etc. There are so many variable.

     

    As air rises a low pressure occurs and air enters underneath, a the top it cools and splits east and west. To the east it sinks and causes Higher pressure and less or no rain.

     

    The whole process moves from the East all around the tropics over a month to 6 weeks and kicks off again.

     

     

    Phases

    Section the areas off and give them a number around the tropics. If in the area one gets that number.

    image.thumb.png.c38dd4989bad86c2eb9f26d0ae928fb5.png

     

    These common Diagrams below, instead of  MAP OF THE TROPICs, we can see the world split into 4 quarters, each quarter 2 phases of 8 total. It’s confusing at first, but it shows the current phase (Red), the previous phase and the forecast phase. But it also shows the amplitude of the phase, the higher above the centre circle the higher the phase, below the centre circle and it’s a very suppressed MJO signal. And of course, multiple ensemble runs to try to find consensus in the forecast. One can see even yesterday's plots show a lot of divergence in the 5 days forecast already, never mind Day 15 etc.

    image.thumb.png.0a822329cb1cc64199c1001e5c866b58.png


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/99584-model-output-discussion-into-winter/?do=findComment&comment=4972108
  2. 2 hours ago, I remember Atlantic 252 said:

    I remember day too well, the day LW252 went off air!

    image.thumb.png.ae85a6e353e8eaf721a3f8a8905b81f5.png

    I used to see the mast, it was based in Ireland. Radio, someone still loves you! As Freddie sung to us. Good old Freddie.

    It was the week before Christmas and nowhere in Europe or North Africa was above normal temps for the first time ever

    image.thumb.png.94daa720e4bffc1e8068ce4c3cca0f9b.png

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  3. It's all about the core of those Atlantic heights moving more northerly. We need the momentum to come from somewhere to do that. I have no idea if it will happen or not, but Scandi High seems out so we more or less know where to place the bets. Looking forward to next set of runs and the updated 46 day charts from ECM. But still plenty of time to build something good here.

    image.thumb.png.fb9268274a343e7ddfc2332cc2bb0da2.png

    • Like 2
  4. 10 minutes ago, Mike Poole said:

    I think you might be trying to have your cake and eat it here?  You’ve argued the ensembles are the right way to go week 2 and beyond, but with that comes the spread.  The BOM chart shown by @Downburst says it’s an ensemble of 33 members and they are all amplified.  So there is a difference - I’ll be much happier when the amplification into phase 7 is confirmed by other models, the BOM being the go to model all of a sudden has a whiff of cherry picking to me.

    @Mike Poole @bluearmyHere is a paper, published 2022 from Copernicus, so more august body in my mind. Max-Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Reading etc 

     

    From the Abstract: "Although in the last decades state-of-the-art climate models have proved their capability for forecasting the MJO exceeding the 5 weeks prediction skill, there is still room for improving the prediction. In 5 this study we use Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and a Machine Learning (ML) algorithm as post-processing methods to improve the forecast of the model that currently holds the best MJO forecasting performance, the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) model."

     

    https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-2/egusphere-2022-2.pdf

    I have given it a once over, but will have a more focused read later. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 2
  5. 43 minutes ago, northwestsnow said:

    Are we to believe BOM over GFS/EC though Blue ?

    Big difference in  the projected amplitude.

    Interesting few days coming up..

     

    As we all know the MJO is ticking away all the time since the ice age ended and there is a danger it will be taken too seriously for cause and affect when needed for a cause. I think the main issue I have is this BOM chart, seems always to be in insane amplification, like 100% more. So I'll be sticking with ECMWF and I certainly don't buy the argument that Australians have the MJO nailed in their computer models and the rest don't, hard to believe that given the age we are in and funding ECMWF and GFS get etc. 

     

    Dec 5th ECMWF

    image.thumb.png.524a26735f3cb057163a83483a9ea7b5.png

    Dec 4 BOM

    image.thumb.png.a7b070b9bfe8ebe3f8307c60a0cb2738.png

    • Like 1
  6. Would like a take on this, from ECM site and the long range. 

    2M Temp Area average Northern Europe, to show where this is, a map

    image.thumb.png.7b6a52844f1138b2f5a53153d6ab29ba.png

     

    A very large drop (Purple) in 2m temp compared to climate (Grey) for December showing there, purple box the middle tercile. This is opposite of the prediction last month which had December positive..

    image.thumb.png.6065139fa9a7753aaa01b26dba619f4f.png

    https://charts.ecmwf.int/products/seasonal_system5_climagrams_2mt?base_time=202312010000&index_type=Northern Europe

     

    And NOA negative for each of the 3 months to come. Although it has been negative nearly all year. But near -3 for February, which fits into expctations.

    image.thumb.png.52deae58234c399fb24681025d391025.png

    • Like 2
    • Insightful 2
  7. The ECM MJO for Day 10, the mean line is now above the COD area for phase 6, whereas yesterday and a few days before it flirted with below. So phase 6 period is adjusting and it it continues we might see more towards the end of the GFS runs at least and perhaps shortly the 10 day ECM. Remember the higher the amplitude the more skill the forecast has historically, so maybe once the next 5 days finish we might get more consistency. 

    image.thumb.png.57dfe20e0fd5c44308fc89169ea4ac98.png

    In saying all this, I am thinking, at least at the surface, that Canadian (+10c and corresponding Siberian -10 c temp anomaly this week is so strong, one has to wonder surely that will have more effect than anything else? 

    image.thumb.png.1f7383be1fa828e223419b5a9c92e19f.png

     

    Also, over the last few days the 10hpa anomaly over the pole has really strengthened each run for 1st week of January. Although I won't hazard a guess (mini ice age end of January 😂) how and when that might effect us, especially so far out from even happening, but that's a strong signal all the same.

     

    image.thumb.png.da25b6870bae6efa0d4f2d53e7f6507e.png

    • Like 3
  8. 1 hour ago, sebastiaan1973 said:

    A tweet by World Climate Service. We heading to a Modoki El Nino.

    Schermafbeelding 2023-12-04 200229.jpg

    Yes, world climate service is not related to any UN or intergovernmental org etc. but I looked up some info on Modoki EL Nino, can’t find a reliable comment as to what this might mean to these parts, so I’ll leave this from WIKI and that’s saying a lot if you follow

    Recent years when La Niña Modoki events occurred include 1973–1974, 1975–1976, 1983–1984, 1988–1989, 1998–1999, 2000–2001, 2008–2009, 2010–2011, and 2016–2017.

    and again wiki

    The first recorded El Niño that originated in the central Pacific and moved toward the east was in 1986.[77] Recent Central Pacific El Niños happened in 1986–87, 1991–92, 1994–95, 2002–03, 2004–05 and 2009–10.[78] Furthermore, there were "Modoki" events in 1957–59,[79] 1963–64, 1965–66, 1968–70, 1977–78 and 1979–80.[80][81] Some sources say that the El Niños of 2006-07 and 2014-16 were also Central Pacific El Niños

    impacts on Europe, El Niño's effects on Europe are controversial, complex and difficult to analyse, as it is one of several factors that influence the weather over the continent and other factors can overwhelm the signal


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/99584-model-output-discussion-into-winter/?do=findComment&comment=4970099
    • Like 2
  9. 1 hour ago, sebastiaan1973 said:

    A tweet by World Climate Service. We heading to a Modoki El Nino.

    Schermafbeelding 2023-12-04 200229.jpg

    Yes, world climate service is not related to any UN or intergovernmental org etc. but I looked up some info on Modoki EL Nino, can’t find a reliable comment as to what this might mean to these parts, so I’ll leave this from WIKI and that’s saying a lot if you follow

    Recent years when La Niña Modoki events occurred include 1973–1974, 1975–1976, 1983–1984, 1988–1989, 1998–1999, 2000–2001, 2008–2009, 2010–2011, and 2016–2017.

    and again wiki

    The first recorded El Niño that originated in the central Pacific and moved toward the east was in 1986.[77] Recent Central Pacific El Niños happened in 1986–87, 1991–92, 1994–95, 2002–03, 2004–05 and 2009–10.[78] Furthermore, there were "Modoki" events in 1957–59,[79] 1963–64, 1965–66, 1968–70, 1977–78 and 1979–80.[80][81] Some sources say that the El Niños of 2006-07 and 2014-16 were also Central Pacific El Niños

    impacts on Europe, El Niño's effects on Europe are controversial, complex and difficult to analyse, as it is one of several factors that influence the weather over the continent and other factors can overwhelm the signal

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Insightful 2
  10. I tell you what. Looking a the spread of those MJO plots really tells you how hard more than 10 days forecasting is, if not borderline impossible to be honest thinking about it. If you can't get that very complex forecast correct, the the knock on effects given this etc and try to predict weather in North West Europe for 20 odd days ahead? I think it's a lesson to everyone to be conscious of that, not only do we not know what phase we will be in, we don't know the amplitude, all we have is the mean really and a good look at the spread making that mean. I'd be even more careful of this Phase 7 to 8 for end of month, it doesn't have to happen.

    • Like 5
    • Thanks 1
  11. There is a paper here on the Skill of the MJO models. The briefest summary is if the initial condition is in high amplitude the resultant forecast skill increases. Also some data outlining the number of days each major model attempts to predict for. And some mad maths in there too if you are brave enough.

    journals

     

    To add, noaa produce verification for previous 7 and 15 days on their site

     

    most recent ECM, hard to make a call there, seems to me the mean is looking not amplified and the initial conditions show a strong starting point, hence increasing skill of the forecast. But not my area at all

    image.thumb.png.4015fd6ad92cc9356607d662fea3690f.png

    • Thanks 2
  12. 19 minutes ago, Snowy L said:

    After seeing the huge BFTE being blown away with ease by a small low  in 2018 I've never believed the cold is hard to shift myth, that was a rude awakening. With this cold spell though I do think there could be surprises, because we have positive reinforcements e.g. Canadian warming after the jet fires up, as opposed to waiting the inevitable after our initial block loses strength. If those reinforcements can affect the jet on time there's no reason we can't stay in the cold side. As said a few days ago the timing of those conflicting interactions will result in the messiest charts ever.

    Yes and there is cold all over the northern hemisphere all winter, in many cases further south than here and yet the models aren't drastically wrong about that, so I can't see how the physics in the models doesn't account for it just because it's in north west europe, although I get the point, just not sure the models don't account for it. No hassle anyway.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...