Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

BornFromTheVoid

Forum Team
  • Posts

    11,369
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

Posts posted by BornFromTheVoid

  1. 13 hours ago, Snipper said:

    Is this true?

    AgEXQURJRWp0eEhXU19haUIzVUlTU2dLeEEAMA
    APPLE.NEWS

    A pair of studies paint a worrying picture of accelerating ice loss around the world, with serious consequences for projections of sea level rise

     

    Yep, was posted in the new research section a few days back. The values comes from all forms of ice, so ice sheets, glaciers, sea ice, etc. 
    Comes from a recently published study out of (primarily) Leeds uni.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  2. Extent in the Sea of Okhotsk has climbed to the 10th highest position for January 27th. Conversely, Baffin Bay and the Gulf of St Lawrence on the opposite side of the Arctic are 2nd lowest and lowest on record respectively.

    j27Okho.thumb.png.ac1f082c2d10670b55367800414664e6.png j27Baff.thumb.png.5cff339e50ff0aad59622d3a6e7556ca.png j27StLaw.thumb.png.50f2667e80418c2cae09a4a617e9e7a2.png

    The effects of the -ve NOA are quite clear on the ice cover around Eastern Canada (red is 81-10 average).

    Jan27Regional.thumb.png.0d190c01abd4651685dd22ab81a9a35b.png

    • Like 2
  3. 2 hours ago, damianslaw said:

    Surprised winter 15/16 didn't record highest number, given how mild December was. Also last winter as well.. 2014/2015 I remember brought many very near average days and ended up very near average with no notable warmth from memory.. 2013/2014 also was exceptionally mild, is 14/15 right?

    You're correct, I misread the data. Should have been 2015/16.

  4. Extent in the peripheral Arctic seas has slowed recently, dropping from 13ᵗʰ down to 6ᵗʰ lowest on record. While ice cover in the Sea of Okhotsk remains extensive (15ᵗʰ highest) Baffin Bay is down to second lowest and the Gulf of St. Lawrence is now lowest on record.

    PeripheralSeas_J26.thumb.png.0ae7f5edfdfee4bb3e0d7b159c3566d1.png

    • Like 2
  5. tc-15-233-2021-avatar-web.png
    TC.COPERNICUS.ORG

    <p><strong class="journal-contentHeaderColor">Abstract.</strong> We combine satellite observations and numerical models to show that Earth lost 28 trillion tonnes of ice between 1994 and...

    Abstract
    We combine satellite observations and numerical models to show that Earth lost 28 trillion tonnes of ice between 1994 and 2017. Arctic sea ice (7.6 trillion tonnes), Antarctic ice shelves (6.5 trillion tonnes), mountain glaciers (6.1 trillion tonnes), the Greenland ice sheet (3.8 trillion tonnes), the Antarctic ice sheet (2.5 trillion tonnes), and Southern Ocean sea ice (0.9 trillion tonnes) have all decreased in mass. Just over half (58 %) of the ice loss was from the Northern Hemisphere, and the remainder (42 %) was from the Southern Hemisphere. The rate of ice loss has risen by 57 % since the 1990s – from 0.8 to 1.2 trillion tonnes per year – owing to increased losses from mountain glaciers, Antarctica, Greenland and from Antarctic ice shelves. During the same period, the loss of grounded ice from the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets and mountain glaciers raised the global sea level by 34.6 ± 3.1 mm. The majority of all ice losses were driven by atmospheric melting (68 % from Arctic sea ice, mountain glaciers ice shelf calving and ice sheet surface mass balance), with the remaining losses (32 % from ice sheet discharge and ice shelf thinning) being driven by oceanic melting. Altogether, these elements of the cryosphere have taken up 3.2 % of the global energy imbalance.

    Media article on the paper

    5100.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=8
    WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

    Rate of loss now in line with worst-case scenarios of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

    And an animation showing where the ice loss comes from and variations over time.

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  6. Latest projections and probabilities

    Jan23ProjectF.thumb.png.5e83806e11faf58be68800fc5565858f.png Jan23ProbDist.thumb.png.e62101757736e25de6e6eb5813741250.png

    At the moment, we have 91.2% chance of finishing between 2.5C and 4.0C before corrections.

    The chances of finishing:
    Close to average (3.9 to 4.9C) is  to 4.8% (2 days ago was 5.2%)
    Above average (>4.9C) remains at 0.0% (2 days ago was 0.0%)
    Below average (<3.9C) is  to 95.2% (2 days ago was 94.8%)

    Coldest outcome is  2.3C.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  7. Latest projections and probabilities

    Jan21ProjectF.thumb.png.2ea75deb9cba28b8b2c17eea0ddbcc6f.png Jan21ProbDist.thumb.png.ffc4e8e316c63d7dc2948ed8705ad067.png

    At the moment, we have 91.2% chance of finishing between 2.5C and 4.0C before corrections.

    The chances of finishing:
    Close to average (3.9 to 4.9C) is  to 5.2% (2 days ago was 29.8%)
    Above average (>4.9C) remains at 0.0% (2 days ago was 0.0%)
    Below average (<3.9C) is  to 94.8% (2 days ago was 70.2%)

    Coldest outcome is  1.5C.

    • Like 3
  8. Latest projections and probabilities

    Jan16ProjectF.thumb.png.8a2bdc01dd99bc107660030daa61d405.png Jan16ProbDist.thumb.png.be99ebee17ea85268837a749eba9fabb.png

    At the moment, we have 91.5% chance of finishing between 1.5C and 4.5C.

    The chances of finishing:
    Close to average (3.9 to 4.9C) is  to 32.3% (2 days ago was 22.6%)
    Above average (>4.9C) is  to 0.4% (2 days ago was 0.8%)
    Below average (<3.9C) is  to 67.3% (2 days ago was 76.6%)

    No projection finishes below 0C, and only 1 goes below 1C.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...