Normally just lurk around on here but there seems to be a lot of winging about the inconstancy of the models In my opinion they all do a good job considering the complexity of the task assigned to them, modelling the weather two weeks in advance across the surface of the globe!!! Many of the more experienced and professional posters have mentioned that we are in a knife edge situation, this must mean that small changes of input data into the models will produce dramatic changes further downstream. At least the GFS make all their data freely available, warts and all, something that the met office are probably unwilling to do, as people seem to read long range forecasts as gospel and are disappointed when the weather they are hoping for does not arrive. I can imagine the press every time the met office predicted extreme weather and it did not turn up.. As to what will happen next, I've not got the skills to say, but I would not be upset if a Siberian easterly was not on the cards, from past experience in my part of the world they tend to deliver clear sunny weather with biting winds. I would rather have the sort of Northerly setup that delivered the last lot of snow. Just a hunch but this winter has delivered, and from all the signals there may be a sting in the tail.