Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

The Enforcer

Members
  • Posts

    1,550
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by The Enforcer

  1. 1 hour ago, Mike Poole said:

    No I can’t say that, because I agree with you that it has indicated the way - but, the last bit - to the shores of the UK - is a leap of faith and always will be!

    As I said previously two threads ago, teleconnections take you so far up the garden path, but then a leap of faith is required to translate favourable background signals into snow for the UK. In the SW & Southern Central England region, the kind of leap often required would be the equivalent of jumping the River Thames.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  2. 3 hours ago, Mike Poole said:

    A novel forecasting method, yours, I’ll give you that.  Interesting that the percentage of stinkers thrown out should be roughly inversely proportional to my estimate of the reliability of the ensemble suite.  Offers a clue as to where the truth lies…

    GEFS18z back down to 28% stinkers (excluding the operational and control), same as 00z, better than 06z and 12z.

    • Like 1
  3. 2 hours ago, The Enforcer said:

    From the 06z suites GEFS moved up to 38% stinkers (again including the operational & control). I will post my subjective 12z ensemble suite stinker analysis once the ECMWF ensembles are out.

    1. GEM - 41% (excluding the operational & control) - same as 00z.

    2. GEFS - 34% (including the operational & control) - a little better than 06z, but worse than 00z.

    3. ECMWF - 25% (excluding the operational & control) - same as 00z.

     

    • Like 2
  4. 8 hours ago, The Enforcer said:

    Having looked at the 00z ensembles suites, I subjectively rank the stinker run %s as follows:

    1. GEM - 41% (includes the operational & control)

    2. GFS - 28% (includes the operational & control)

    3. ECMWF - 25%

     

    Certainly room for improvement.

    From the 06z suites GEFS moved up to 38% stinkers (again including the operational & control). I will post my subjective 12z ensemble suite stinker analysis once the ECMWF ensembles are out.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Insightful 1
  5. 2 hours ago, The Enforcer said:

    Could GEFS18z finally be a set devoid of 'stinkers'?

    Almost. Enter GEFSP20:

    gensnh-20-1-216.thumb.png.0c12b8d3cce230ada9d060ab5d278001.pnggensnh-20-0-216.thumb.png.0fbb3b287554ce559d5e1bc9042fa0a7.pnggensnh-20-1-276.thumb.png.eb52a0e086553d4db119d5a9a61c453b.pnggensnh-20-0-276.thumb.png.63e90d38b8610be2908f68747625189c.png

    It follows the macro-pattern and nearly has an acceptable solution for the micro-pattern, but it's still a stinker due to the ensuing extreme North-South temperature profile and perceived split in fortunes and all the acrimony that comes with it. If Sunday's trends could continue into the next week, this type of outcome could be put to bed.

    • Like 1
  6. 2 minutes ago, StingJet said:

    interesting mate .. something I have observed also , I can understand the reasons for certain types of "rain" not being picked up on dop radar , but you would have thought Satellite imagery would "see all"

    I have to cross check with various websites .. a little like we do with model analysis and looking for cross model agreement 

    Does this fair better , where by you can view different cloud levels?

    https://www.windy.com/-Clouds-clouds?clouds,54.759,-1.815,6,i:pressure

    That's done the trick thanks. I'm glad I wasn't going mad. Yes, there's all the cloud.

    • Like 1
  7. From my perspective, there has been little change. The 'stinker' runs have always been there and this is no different for GEFS06z with P29:

    gensnh-24-1-192.thumb.png.9abc692332ec09aa69473342be002924.pnggensnh-24-0-192.thumb.png.97c4d1b64cfd9271f119acc6ccf0dc56.png

    Unlike stinkers in recent preceding outputs, which have been pushing a pattern of bringing in mild air from the SW LP before the maritime polar air arrives, this one develops and blows up an LP in the flow around Iceland and then that absorbs the SW LP, which it looks like might otherwise have disrupted.

    The other thing about this stinker is it is more isolated and arguably less stinky than its predecessors.

  8. 11 minutes ago, Allseasons-Si said:

    Are you trying to enforce some milder weather,you seem to be cherry picking them out on every run,i think you need to join the MRA (mild rampers association)😄

    here are some better charts for you and everyone else

    EPS.

    eps_z500a_nhem_39.thumb.png.8e575d3294be9b36d131d0b4d8268b67.pngeps_mslpa_nhem_41.thumb.png.449795ad5eff65ad951b71cd6429caa0.pngeps_T850a_nhem_41.thumb.png.8457411a1c832125a75d11b5c276b8b6.png

    now onto the 18z,...no mild cherry picking in here please😉

    Goodness no, especially having endured 4 weeks of incessant mild weather, culminating in 50% of January's rain total in 4 days and the consequential flooding that ensued. I'm naturally averse to anything in the output that could potentially provide more of the same under the guise of a 'cold spell'. These types of run have been lingering like a bad smell and I would like to see them go away. As thepost I was responding to eluded to, there was more than one "lemon". The charts that yourself and Lorenzo posted would be perfectly fine.

    • Like 1
    • Insightful 2
  9. 10 minutes ago, ChannelThunder said:

    Looking at the upcoming blocking, it'd be ironic if after the first 4 days of Jan and the large totals, the rest of the month was entirely bone dry to the point where January came in under average!

    Somehow I doubt it. Dry forecast changed to outside chance of rain and sure enough it's raining again:

    image.thumb.png.9b558714e1791374aadf66ac28c80004.png

     

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...