Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?
IGNORED

Control, Mean Operational?


muppet

Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: Berkshire
  • Location: Berkshire

I have looked at the help sections and also the excellent pdf guide to the ensemble graphs.

many thanks for producing those.

however I could only see explanations for the mean and control.

what is the operational line please?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Runcorn, Cheshire
  • Weather Preferences: Snowy winters, hot, sunny springs and summers.
  • Location: Runcorn, Cheshire

If you are referring to the bold green line on the GFS ensemble runs, then I think that you mean the GFS operational runs, which are the charts generated by the GFS. They can be found here:

http://www.netweather.tv/index.cgi?action=nwdc;sess=

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Berkshire
  • Location: Berkshire

yes, I do mean the green line on the graph.

I get the mean is the average of all the runs, the control is the line without any warm or cool adjustments but I still don't follow the green line.

sorry and thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Sunderland
  • Weather Preferences: cold
  • Location: Sunderland

yes, I do mean the green line on the graph.

I get the mean is the average of all the runs, the control is the line without any warm or cool adjustments but I still don't follow the green line.

sorry and thanks.

Hi- the green line is the operational run (the one that is put out and the one that people on here will talk about)- I think this answers your problem?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: st albans
  • Location: st albans

thanks, I'm a bit of a novice.

what is it then?

ie how does it differ from control?

muppet - the operational is run at a higher resolution than the ens runs (inc the control). in theory, it should be more accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Sunderland
  • Weather Preferences: cold
  • Location: Sunderland

great that makes sense.

thanks.

what about the operational compared to the mean?

the operational is supposedly more accurate too?

I'd imagine so. The mean I think is the average of every perbutrations (sic.) so i'd imagine it would need a slightly lower resolution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Runcorn, Cheshire
  • Weather Preferences: Snowy winters, hot, sunny springs and summers.
  • Location: Runcorn, Cheshire

Yes. You will hear the phrase 'reliable time frame' a lot on Net Weather.

Basically the high resolution charts have more accuracy due to more detail. For example:

h850t850eu.png

That is a high res chart. Much more data available for you to look at.

h850t850eu1.png

And the above is low res.

You will find that the low resolution charts are in FI (Fantasy Island). These charts are best used for spotting trends, as alone they are not very accurate.

Hope I helped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Runcorn, Cheshire
  • Weather Preferences: Snowy winters, hot, sunny springs and summers.
  • Location: Runcorn, Cheshire

A much better example can be found on the min/max GFS temperature charts.

The below is low resolution:

ukmaxtemp.png

Look how scattered the temperature colours and numbers are.

The below is high res. Look how much data we can see, so many figures and colours, much more accuracy.

ukmaxtemp1.png

There are charts such as the NMM that go into much higher resolution, but they are part of Net Weather Extra and need to be paid for to view :)

Backtrack.

ah. I see.

and the control data on the ensemble graphs are taken from low res charts.

I'm not too hot on where the ensemble data is taken from sorry, I just know how to view the charts.

Basically the more grouped up members of that run are on the graph, the more accurate it's likely to be, due to multiple runs going for the exact same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Berkshire
  • Location: Berkshire

thanks, I'm guessing

control is low res

mean is average of low res so is low res too

operational is high res and is the one to track.

ps I have a net extra for this month

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Runcorn, Cheshire
  • Weather Preferences: Snowy winters, hot, sunny springs and summers.
  • Location: Runcorn, Cheshire

Oh cool.

Check out the NMM then, it's pretty cool. It's the highest resolution model on Net Weather :)

http://www.netweather.tv/secure/cgi-bin/premium.pl?action=nmm;sess=6ba7048e6273173a35bceaab316834c5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Berkshire
  • Location: Berkshire

thanks.

with that map I don't feel as if I'm getting as accurate data.

am I?

firstly I'm eyeballing where the place is, as opposed to entering a place name and secondly its not to 1 decimal place.

or is it all about resolution?

how easy is it to make that data available in graphical and tabular form?

that would be fantastic.

also just noticed that it is not for more than a day or two, rather than 16.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Runcorn, Cheshire
  • Weather Preferences: Snowy winters, hot, sunny springs and summers.
  • Location: Runcorn, Cheshire

thanks.

with that map I don't feel as if I'm getting as accurate data.

am I?

firstly I'm eyeballing where the place is, as opposed to entering a place name and secondly its not to 1 decimal place.

or is it all about resolution?

how easy is it to make that data available in graphical and tabular form?

that would be fantastic.

also just noticed that it is not for more than a day or two, rather than 16.

You will find that you won't get a more accurate temperature reading than what you get on that model. It's the highest resolution there is.

I'm unsure how easy it is to make the data available in graphical form, you'll have to ask Paul.

The NMM only does 3 days due to the resolution. Further out and it would become pointless, as it would be changing too often to be deemed reliable at such a high resolution. Best man to ask would be Paul. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Aviemore
  • Location: Aviemore

thanks, I'm guessing

control is low res

mean is average of low res so is low res too

operational is high res and is the one to track.

ps I have a net extra for this month

That's not quite right.

The higher resolution chart is the GFS (operational run on the graphs) and that it at 0.5 degree resolution. The rest of the data on the graphs is not from the low resolution chart that you see above as that is at 2.5 degrees and is just for the latter part of the GFS runs. (You can find more info on this here).

The ensembles are all run at 1 degree throughout (the control, mean and other lines on the graphs) - so a much higher resolution than the low res chart above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...