Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Kentish Kiwi

Members
  • Posts

    432
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Kentish Kiwi

  1. Yes, I agree with your point.

    I think that this warming, if it is as strong as it is forecast today, should be enough to weaken the PV considerably. A SSW would be better of course and may still happen.

    Karyo

    Indeed, it seems to me as though the forecasts for a significant warming of the stratosphere have been gaining a little bit of momentum with every new day over the last couple of weeks, although this obviously will come to a halt at some point.

    I am quite weary of Chiono's point about the possibility of the polar vortex reestablishing itself quickly if the warming is not significant enough to "burst" it.

  2. How close does it get?

    I think even without a SSW, we are likely to see a significant warming and reduction in mean zonal winds which should open the door to blocking in favourable places. November 2010 is a recent example.

    Karyo

    Though I would have thought a significant difference between now and November 2010 is that the warming in 2010 occurred at a time before an organised vortex could even develop properly, while now there is a huge and intense vortex that is well established across a large amount of the northern hemisphere. It would seem to me that we need a pretty powerful warming to knock such a big PV out of the poles, especially given how early in the season it is...

  3. Ooh is this what I think it is??? Only worrying thing with the heights trying to go to the north is that huge LP to the west of it, surely that will blast the **** out of the high?

    You'd think that might be the case but...

    http://www.wetterzentrale.de/archive/ra/1991/Rrea00119910202.gif

    http://www.wetterzentrale.de/archive/ra/1991/Rrea00119910205.gif

    Granted 1991 was a special occasion and I'm not suggesting anything similar is going to be repeated as things are currently significantly different synoptically, but just an example of how big low pressures off the west coast of Greenland can quite readily stall and are usually a positive sign as a pre-cursor to an easterly.

  4. Will certainly be interesting to see if the GFS 18z gives any support to the ECM 12z, or indeed its own 06z run, in raising heights in the mid-Atlantic towards Greenland around the +240h period.

    If such a trend is to develop, as hinted at by OMM, it seems to have some support from stratospheric developments and forecasts.

    Edit: Is it just me or at +129h are there already significant differences over and to the west of Greenland on this run compared to the 12z...

  5. Is there any chance the increased amplification and hints of retrogression towards Greenland shown on the GFS 06z and now the ECM 12z could be the models picking up on the effects of the current warming taking place? Or, more excitingly, could it be the models picking up a signal for a SSW pre-cursor blocking event, given the chart Chio posted above?

    post-11145-0-04011700-1324246792_thumb.g

  6. What we can say is that Ian Brown's continued projection of a mild spell around Christmas with HP to the south is looking like a significant possibility, having gained the support of this evening's GFS and ECMWF operational runs. But it's still too far early to be celebrating a victory on the forecasting front.

    Especially when he specified that the mildest Christmas period on record was a distinct possibility. It may well be odds on for a mild Christmas at this stage, but the warmth and general pattern requires a significant 'upgrade' to get near what Ian Brown has been forecasting.

    It's hardly a rarity to see low pressure to the NW, high pressure to the south and SWerly winds prevailing over the UK at this time of year. Just three years ago it was expected of the period. Would be useful if somebody such as Mr Data could provide the statistics or charts illustrating record warmth over Christmas, so comparison can be made to what the models are actually presenting.

  7. And often when it didn't exceed 5.0C, January or Feburay or indeed both was mild.

    Such as Decembers 1989, 1991 (February 92 was mild), 1992, 1996 (February 1997 was mild), 2001, 2003, 2007. So what does that tell us?

    January or February was very often mild in that period, whilst December was much less so. That is all that tells us.

    Bingo. A quite concise illustration of how data/statistics can be moulded and influenced to support a contrasting statement or point of view.

    I must say I'm rather disheartened by the increased frequency with which the 'christmas pudding' has been referred to... I'd hoped we'd have moved on from that exasperating business by now.

  8. The odds of the positioning of the low and intensity are very low for storms 6 days away <30% chance

    BBC are only airing warning because the UK experienced a notable storm a few days ago

    This is typical British weather for Autumn and Winter

    So I will say this again...it's SIX days away. If by Wednesday the track and intensity is the same than we can be 70% sure what we are dealing with.

    These storms are extremely difficult to predict. Even 3 days away, let alone 6.

    True, such storms are enormously difficult to model accurately and it is 5/6 days away so may well be downgraded significantly. However, I would strongly dispute your claim that this is 'typical British weather for Autumn and Winter'.

    The storm that hit Scotland, Ireland and Northern England two/three days ago wasn't 'typical' and nor are the two lows forecast by the GFS for the coming week. These are significant extra-tropical storm systems of notable intensity. It is not at all typical to see three depressions, all with sea-level pressures below 960 (because that is possibility given the modeling) sweep through the UK in the space of a week.

    Given the state of the stratosphere and polar vortex, and particularly after the generally successful modeling of the storm on Thursday, additional attention and caution should be paid to these potential events in my opinion. In fact, from what I witnessed, Thursday's storm was gradually upgraded as it neared (apart from I believe a very slight last minute weakening) rather than the usual downgrades we are so well accustomed to, although I doubt there is much potential whatsoever for the the storm on the 18z GFS to be upgraded.

  9. ECM showing an interesting little storm at 192, that if it were to come off, would cause blizzards possible with severe gales and heavy snow over much of southern Britain.

    Good old FI!

    ECM8thdec2011stromshowing.gif

    Somehow I don't think the upper will be quite low enough for blizzards...

    Recm1922.gif

    Certainly very interesting though, with very strong winds for this part of the country. Would be quite the little storm.

    A very clear signal from the ECM for the jet to track south, would have been immersurably more exciting if we had a cold/snow covered continent and northerly blocking of some kind. Nevertheless certainly something of more interest for southern members from this evening runs.

    Looking at the charts again, it really is such shame there's no cold pool to tap into to the east, otherwise the ECM from +192h through to +240h could have been something quite special... -_-

  10. As I've stated before, it might not look exactly like this due to La Nina, but could there be very tentative signs of the tropospheric polar vortex at least becoming stretched into an odd shape, which might open the door for wave breaking into the stratospheric vortex at the end of the month ?

    By this do you at all mean you expect there to be a more NE/Eerly component to the wind direction, with stronger blocking over Scandinavia, rather than the general northerly that seems to be illustrated GP?

    That particular composite for January looks rather similar to the kind of set-up experienced midway through December 2010 to my decidedly amateur eye...

  11. Are you saying this for the whole winter or for just the coming days? I hope it's the latter.

    Just the coming days. No one has can accurately predict the end of this week let alone the rest of the winter. Personally I doubt there'll be much for the Midlands, south (in terms of snowfall) until at least after Christmas or New Years but things could change drastically should the stratosphere warm suddenly.

  12. Ok, but hasn't GFS been poorest performer of late and so I assume that support would be needed from euros too? Wouldn't the strong PV have had us in that situation now if it was the controlling factor and the default set up? Or is the PV set to intensify further? For me we will need euros on board and a few more days of consistent runs.

    Whilst the coldest of any weather is for the north I think over a period of ten days if this set continues I think for the south average is better description.

    BFTP

    Like it or not the stratospheric signal would provide reasonably strong support for an evolution akin to the GFS 06z. I get the feeling we've been pretty 'lucky' with the current cold snap and indeed we are fortunate to have the one forecast for later this week.

    The stratosphere has been at record or near record levels of cold for a while now and it seems inevitable that we revert to such a pattern as illustrated on this mornings run eventually. This is particularly significant taking into account the usual lag time for the effects of the stratosphere to be felt in the lower levels of the troposphere.

  13. For London & the SE, perhaps Whipsnade or High Wycombe.

    Pretty certain, as Aaron says, the North Downs are snowier than those two locations, primarily due to a favourable combination of their altitude and proximity to the sea. Also their exposure to the 'famous' Thames Streamer is a significant factor - they can actually be one of the hardest hit areas in England under a potent easterly and a a supportive wind direction (specifically more ENEerly).

    I would suggest that places such as Blotley Hill (267m & highest point on the North Downs) or the area around Biggin Hill, which is directly in the firing line of the Thames Streamer, would be in contention for snowiest area in the SE. Locally, but slightly further south, the town of Crowborough (242m asl) is also often mentioned and regarded as being particularly hard hit by snow.

    Leith Hill (294m asl and part of the Greensand Ridge) in Surrey is also surely a strong contender, being the highest point in the SE (south of London), second highest in the whole of the region by only 3m, and also in an overall favourable location for a variety of snow set-ups. It is also slightly further from the UHI of London than the above areas of the North Downs which may be a contributing factor, at least in retaining snowcover, although I am uncertain what impact London's UHI has on areas of the North Downs that have relatively significant altitude.

  14. Has anyone else noticed that in early Spring, it can get rather balmy on sunny days but when this happens, the temperature often drops heavily over night (and sometimes we get a frost). Meanwhile, in late Autumn, the temperature sometimes doesn't drop much overnight and the sun has little impact during the day.

    Once again a result of the latent heat held by the land and sea and the residule cold after the winter.

×
×
  • Create New...