Jump to content
Thunder?
Local
Radar
Hot?

karlos1983

Members
  • Posts

    7,635
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

Posts posted by karlos1983

  1. 1 minute ago, Johnp said:

    Just some more info on the MJO.

    We're currently in phase 4 - this image from Marco Petagna (Met Office)

    shows the trends for each phase 

     

    EE30F8A0-BD44-40CE-82C9-1901F24A72AE.jpeg

    That’s the guy that writes a lot of the Long range forecasts for the MetO. He’s worth a follow seems a decent fella, replies to tweets as well. 

    • Like 3
  2. Just now, Johnp said:

    Are they trolling us and just putting the same images up every few days?

    My hope is the signals for hight lat blocking are correct, and it's just a case of the downwelling being much slower than expected.

    LOL yes it does feel we are being trolled!

    I think that could well be the case! At least once this propagation has happened, a clearer picture should start to emerge.. *hopefully

    • Like 1
  3. Yes Weeks 2,3,4

    looking good as we head into February

    FAED829C-D900-463E-AC5A-FCC0AC72D774.thumb.png.e2bd974edb31f90a910f932449b9b3bc.png94161300-510B-4F72-91CD-F270077414F9.thumb.png.bed3863f4bf8fd0db33723ca3e0fa470.png5545D248-35A6-45CA-8DD9-D07D54D0A9F7.thumb.png.98616ffb34d494e742af88588ecddbd7.png

    Although we’ve been here before, I understand the lack of excitement that this update may bring. 

    But I’d rather it showed this signal than comfirm what some of the more sceptical are possibly thinking! ☺️

    • Like 6
    • Thanks 2
  4. 3 minutes ago, Ed Stone said:

    Geez! Some folks do love to complain!:wallbash:

    Yeah I know, I was just confused where to post, but I’m over that.  I actually like the bit of freedom this thread gives for a bit of humour rather than “it must be deep model analysis only”!

    You can’t have your cake and eat it, although it appears that’s what some are after ?‍♂️ 

    anyway, easterly on the cards again! Pass me a beer!

    • Like 6
  5. 11 minutes ago, johnholmes said:

    Yes exactly John. But I think when we use the term it’s usually to our N or NE forcing sliding lows over the uk and bringing snow chances. Obviously wedges of heights could appear anywhere on the globe, but this is usually when many would refer to said wedges on this forum... I think

    • Like 1
  6. 6 minutes ago, Sperrin said:

    Would @bluearmy or anyone else have time to give a quick explanation of a wedge? Am I right in thinking its an increase in application of a high pressure cell that causes the jet to come in on a NW/SE axis causing a PM flow as opposed to full on Greenland block?

    A wedge of heights to the N or NE of the UK that can direct low pressure system on a more SE trajectory in a sliding fashion over the UK! Is my understanding. 

    • Thanks 1
  7. 5 minutes ago, feb1991blizzard said:

    If anyone needed convincing that there is no sign of nirvana in the modelling then surely the above post is it, more to the point, who actually posted it!

    I’m almost at my wits end with this winter. I know there’s still a while to go, but all I see at the moment is that stubborn PV lobe and it’s not going anywhere fast. 

    Hideous output this morning, unless you live on pretty high ground in the North!

    The EC46 update tonight will be interesting. 

    • Like 2
  8. 3 minutes ago, doctormog said:

    The balloon data appears to be at 77MB rather than the 18z norm of 99MB. I doubt those 20MB would make any significant impact on the 2TB set.

    I’m guessing the 91% is based on the deviation from the daily average not the 18z one

    https://www.metcheck.com/WEATHER/gfs_gdas_observation_amount_quality.asp

    Goes to show how utterly useless the 18z & 06z are! That’s a staggering data difference on balloon data alone! 12z/00z use 1.6GB and the 06/18z use 99mb  

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...