-
Posts
7,635 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
27
Content Type
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Learn About Weather and Meteorology
Community guides
Posts posted by karlos1983
-
-
Just now, Johnp said:
Are they trolling us and just putting the same images up every few days?
My hope is the signals for hight lat blocking are correct, and it's just a case of the downwelling being much slower than expected.
LOL yes it does feel we are being trolled!
I think that could well be the case! At least once this propagation has happened, a clearer picture should start to emerge.. *hopefully
- 1
-
-
-
Just now, Paul Sherman said:
Didnt see it but guessing its mainly for the North West ??
The graphics didn’t suggest that. They may use that forecast for the 22:00 news on BBC1
- 2
-
3 minutes ago, Updated_Weather said:
Sounds intriguing to say the least.
Jet way to the south, snow was mentioned with low heights very near or over the UK. Certainly looks a tricky forecasting period coming up with chances a plenty!
- 4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
BBC forecast looked quite juicy for next week on BBC news channel just now to be honest.
- 8
- 2
-
-
It also says keep it model related and more importantly “friendly”
- 4
- 1
-
Just now, Disco_Stu said:
How many more times do we have hear the phrase 'background signals'?
Well the tail doesn’t wag the dog....
- 1
-
Hungarian MetO site should update soon for EC monthly snapshot. It’s usually out by now
- 1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, Polar Maritime said:Yet..
Exactly PM... yet is the word as far as I’m concerned.
I’m not sure if people are aware that the downward propagation is still underway, the signal is for this to reach the surface at the end of January. So as we head to February, anyone writing the background signals such as the SSW off, are doing so prematurely.
Also can I just add, that the people that go to extreme lengths to construct in-depth posts as to where we may be heading and why, looking at teleconnections etc, should not be disregarded so flipently when things don’t turn out how people wish, they should actually be commended. People used to say the strat had nothing to do with colder winters if i remember correctly and that has now been well and truly put to bed. Not withstanding the fact it is pretty rude, especially when you don’t have a coherent reply to debate it with, just a throw away comment to say they are useless.
- 15
-
3 minutes ago, Ed Stone said:
Geez! Some folks do love to complain!
Yeah I know, I was just confused where to post, but I’m over that. I actually like the bit of freedom this thread gives for a bit of humour rather than “it must be deep model analysis only”!
You can’t have your cake and eat it, although it appears that’s what some are after
anyway, easterly on the cards again! Pass me a beer!
- 6
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
3 minutes ago, O'Maille80 said:These threads have been dead since they split them. Hard to follow anything.
Agreed, it’s hard to know where to post..
- 11
- 1
-
11 minutes ago, johnholmes said:
various links but all say ridge of high pressure
Yes exactly John. But I think when we use the term it’s usually to our N or NE forcing sliding lows over the uk and bringing snow chances. Obviously wedges of heights could appear anywhere on the globe, but this is usually when many would refer to said wedges on this forum... I think
- 1
-
6 minutes ago, Sperrin said:
Would @bluearmy or anyone else have time to give a quick explanation of a wedge? Am I right in thinking its an increase in application of a high pressure cell that causes the jet to come in on a NW/SE axis causing a PM flow as opposed to full on Greenland block?
A wedge of heights to the N or NE of the UK that can direct low pressure system on a more SE trajectory in a sliding fashion over the UK! Is my understanding.
- 1
-
2 minutes ago, SLEETY said:
March seems to be the best time for Easterlies in recent years that give you decent snowfalls and bitter temperatures
March is always more likely to have Scandinavian Heights than mid-winter. Guessing because the PV begins to break down
- 5
-
5 minutes ago, feb1991blizzard said:
If anyone needed convincing that there is no sign of nirvana in the modelling then surely the above post is it, more to the point, who actually posted it!
I’m almost at my wits end with this winter. I know there’s still a while to go, but all I see at the moment is that stubborn PV lobe and it’s not going anywhere fast.
Hideous output this morning, unless you live on pretty high ground in the North!
The EC46 update tonight will be interesting.
- 2
-
-
3 minutes ago, doctormog said:
The balloon data appears to be at 77MB rather than the 18z norm of 99MB. I doubt those 20MB would make any significant impact on the 2TB set.
I’m guessing the 91% is based on the deviation from the daily average not the 18z one
https://www.metcheck.com/WEATHER/gfs_gdas_observation_amount_quality.asp
Goes to show how utterly useless the 18z & 06z are! That’s a staggering data difference on balloon data alone! 12z/00z use 1.6GB and the 06/18z use 99mb
- 1
-
-
Just now, BlackburnChris said:
someone is winding you up mate, that chart aint real
It’s not a wind up. It’s very much real.
-
3 minutes ago, ICE COLD said:
Balloon data missing 91% of data
Yeah that’s more than just a bit lol
- 1
-
Cold hunt - models and chat
in Spring Weather Discussion
Posted
That’s the guy that writes a lot of the Long range forecasts for the MetO. He’s worth a follow seems a decent fella, replies to tweets as well.