SP
It is important of note as mentioned by some that the sea ice coverage has rapidly increased and are back to normal levels. Bearing in mind the record sea ice minima this is indeed an important event. I said back in early August that i fully expect sea ice to fully reform in the Arctic...Steve MURR I believe commented on my 'brave' call, however, I was right. The only difference is that it has happened a bit quicker than i thought. The Arctic must be building some serious cold up there, those pictures in the papers of the 'poor' polar bears were utter warmist nonsense. When thiose cold shots come down they will be very potent. Be glad you are not in the NE USA this winter as I believe record cold events will occur there this winter. When I posted on the 'other' site last autumn I stated that last winter would be transitional and the synoptic pattern would change. I believe we have entered a new phase and a longer term pattern that will see a gradual cooling trend. My statement re this winter was that I felt Feb might be cold enough to offset the winter CET. I am changing that to 'it will offset the CET for winter'. Two reasons are that
1 I believe it will be a very cold month
2 The colder spells we will get in Jan will be colder than 1st thought thus the CET won't be as high as first thought by the time we get to Feb.
There will be a big shock tio some people this winter in that we will get periods of 10days to 2weeks where it will be cold enough for snow to be lying in lowland UK...
As regards to the SSTs I say if they are as important as some people suggest then the current state is very good and improving. Even with the long southerly spell we experienced the SSTs to our north were totally unaffected.
regards
BFTP