Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

inghams85

Members
  • Posts

    596
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by inghams85

  1. Just to add to Chiono's post....... You have just posted some ensembles as evidence of what an undercut looks like and try aren't undercuts AT ALL! The UKMO almost couldn't be more classical undercut if it tried!
  2. Thanks chaps. It's fascinating watching the building blocks elaborated so well by GP
  3. Would you say there are small steps towards a Scandinavian over European block knocks?
  4. Not overwhelmingly but having followed the last 2 or 3 days of the GEFS there's small signs that's on the increase. The anomaly you just posted I believe will start to show this by the end of the weekend
  5. The negative heights starting to show up in Europe is what catches my eye...... Baby steps, January looks VERY interesting
  6. That chart synoptically is way better than today. The high is centred over England and lower heights are in the med. The high is 200-300 miles further north so had less distance to travel to establish northern blocking. You need to look at the detail....
  7. Earlier records are not thought of as "unreliable" they are used in confidence by the worlds top climate scientist. Stop spinning nonsense to suit.
  8. A good post! The end game in a warming world is ultimately a shrinking of the North pole ice sheet. There are two way out of this: - a maunder minimum - negative feedbacks eventually from a slowing north Atlantic drift (little ice age)
  9. Hahahahahaha!!! The ice extent and volume will go up and down variably as can be seen in the last 3 years. The longer term trend however is unfortunately down as will be the case by the end of this years melt season (which is happening as I type) Your persistence to refuting already peer reviewed science in the arctic is commendable but ultimately wrong
  10. Just give up Keith lmfaooooo no one takes the blind bit of notice of the rubbish you post!
  11. Exactly Pennine. I for one am not getting into a debate over proven data backed evidence. It's a shame this thread gets drawn into this argument when more important issues i.e the state of the ice needs to be discussed. I guess its a case of putting certain postees on block and listening to data from the likes of BFTV. Its like someone 20 years down the line arguing antibiotics dont kill infection.........I think this thread is going off on a tangent now so will be the last of my input A date is not necessary. The science behind a warming arctic is proven and the decline decade upon decade is there for all to see.
  12. "We do not and haven't denied there has been a reduction in the ice over the Artcic for the last 20 years. How do you know (or all your so called scientists) that it is caused by AnthroCO2 and not a natural warming phase?" I know because this has been proven as has global warming many years ago! It's an argument closed for debate, ratified by all the top climatologists on the planet. End of conversation. The fact you still feel you need to argue its not is comedy in itself. Again....... calling an apple a banana...... This argument has no place for this thread. The thing that now needs discussing is how quickly the ice in the north pole will melt to give us an ice free summer.
  13. Just to put it into perspective how absurd yourself KL and 4's viewpoint is. This thread was brought up in the Sheffield seminar of climatologists today and you guys were the laughing stock for half an hour. In fact the quote was that you would still call an apple a banana when to everyone else they could see it was an apple. Stop trying to disprove what is happening in the Arctic. Its already been scientifically proven by scientists with 10,000 times the brain cells of yourselves
  14. No disrespect intended to him as a person but in a thread such as this posters should rightly be held accountable for posting ridiculous graphs to counter a fairly straight forward point been put forward by BFTV that we are currently at a record low maximum for the date with a case of extreme proportion being put forward for setting new records. How can you defend his post???
  15. One of the worst posts I have ever seen!!! *bangs head against a brick wall!!!* lol
  16. I know looking at the models and current/expected conditions and the forecast of the experts of NOAA that if I had to place a bet we will hit yet another record in the Arctic in the next 6 weeks. It's long odds on and to suggest otherwise is just stubborness to admit this
  17. Sure..... Use the word potential as a back up to an unlikely scenario..... lol potentially I could become the next prime minister. Here's the definition for "unlikely" http://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-samsung&source=android-home&site=webhp&source=hp&ei=Gin-VIKeL4GyUY_Xg5gG&q=unlikely+definition&oq=unlikely+def&gs_l=mobile-gws-hp.1.0.0l2j0i22i30l3.2734.9754.0.10742.17.15.2.8.8.0.284.3116.0j6j9.15.0.msedr...0...1c.1.62.mobile-gws-hp..1.16.1420.3.PD8TY709yAg
  18. No that's true but it's also reasonable to suggest that the experts in the field have a better handle of the situation than an amateur enthusiast.
  19. The most respected scientists in the world and some of the most important people on the planet including prime ministers and presidents and little old 4wd is still in denial and still thinks he knows best lol one of the most entertaining posters on the forum!
  20. The latest 18z has just adjusted the cold about 50-80 miles further east as far as the freezing level is concerned so not a surprise
  21. It's going to lead to disappointment for most
  22. As can be seen below there is a warmer sector on the east coast. This is just the isotherm Dew points are also poor for the East
  23. It's too warm for you near the coast if you play through the isotherm on the models. Colder more inland although inland is very marginal. Don't expect anything other than sleet if it does hit
  24. Well I've had 3 very good snow events this winter so it's been decent in South Yorkshire. I've been happy with the cold spell
×
×
  • Create New...