Methuselah

A polite request: :lol: With things going mad on the forum, we are having to be rather ruthless in our deletion of 'one-line wonders'! If you all put said posts in the appropriate threads, we'd have more time to read short posts (in here) to see if they're relevant, rather than just binning them??? Help us to help you!!! :lol:

'TODAY'S NUMERICAL MODELS ARE IN FAIRLY GOOD AGREEMENT ON THE EXPECTED 500-HPA HEIGHT PATTERN THROUGH THE 6-10 DAY PERIOD. THIS PATTERN FEATURES UPPER LEVEL TROUGHING OVER THE EASTERN PACIFIC AND MUCH OF ALASKA, UPPER LEVEL RIDGING OVER THE ROCKIES AND CENTRAL U.S., AND UPPER LEVEL TROUGHING OVER THE EASTERN THIRD OF THE CONUS. TODAY'S 06Z GFS ENSEMBLE AND 00Z CANADIAN ENSEMBLE PREDICT MORE UPPER-LEVEL TROUGHING OVER THE EAST THAN THE 00Z ECMWF ENSEMBLE, WHICH DEPICTS A LESS AMPLIFIED PATTERN WITH A BROAD RIDGE COVERING MOST OF THE U.S. THE 06Z GFS ENSEMBLE HAS SHOWN A VERY CONSISTENT TREND TOWARD AMPLIFYING THE PATTERN, WITH THE UPPER-LEVEL RIDGE BUILDING WESTWARD INTO THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST, AND THE UPPER-LEVEL TROUGH BUILDING SOUTHWEST INTO THE SOUTHEAST AND SOUTH CENTRAL U.S. IN ADDITION, THE 06Z GFS ENSEMBLE MEAN SOLUTION IS VERY SIMILAR TO THE 06Z DETERMINISTIC GFS SOLUTION, FURTHER INCREASING CONFIDENCE IN THE GFS SOLUTION'. Posted above by CC!!!

Dry and getting misty/foggy, near freezing...

I certainly hope so!!!!

Very sensible, PP!

Dry and clear, 3C...

I do suspect that that is all anyone can really say, Ice...

I think, it just goes to show that, trying to predict more than 7 days' ahead is a - waste of time??

I would like see that 'warm' sector get narrower as it moves south??? Plenty of time for shrinkage... :unsure:

A combination of being close to the North Sea AND being on high ground???

Quite possibly. It certainly was when I was there, in 1970!

You're welcome mate...East or west?? In an East wind look East (or South?)...

Why not just help the Underdeveloped World develop sustainably??? We cannae just let them rot!!

Is that what Tiger Woods called it? What's wrong with s******g?:lol:

Welcome to the madhouse, azumin...It would help if you added your location to your profile...Like: where are you? :lol:

Well dogs, even 15,000 flakes'll be better than last winter's pathetic performance...The Press has no sense of proportion!!

You're all doomed, doomed!!!

lol SQ1! Do you know what I got from last Feb's 'snownanza'? (There's a song there?) Zilch!! That's what... :lol: Anyhoo, it's far-too early to be writing things off yet...Wait for future developments?

Daily Crap exclusive: Snowball Earth!!! :lol: I thought they were Spot On??? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Stop your moaning badboy!!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

I'd certainly hope that, after meandering its way all the way to Glasgow, it could traverse another eight miles to Paisley???

No probs at all, mate. (I know I can sometimes come-across all wrong. )...Maybe, after the upcoming snowfest, we'll all get down to some proper discussion???

Dry and sunny, 5C...

Really folks! Some of the doom-and-gloom is really quite surprising... :lol: As an old fart, I can still recall the run-up to the megablizzard of 1969 (in MK)... For two days' prior to the event, we had to endure a cloudy fresh-to-strong ESE wind with daytime maxima of around +1C and minima around -1C! Come-on peeps, when was the last time we saw these (potential!) synoptics evolving???

If you'd read my post properly (maybe my bad?) you'd have realized that I was comparing the approaches employed by sceptics (LIH) to those of deniers (OMG! All the data must be a priori gerrymandered!)...I wasn't pointing the finger at you, at all...