Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

coldie

Members
  • Posts

    151
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by coldie

  1. 4 minutes ago, Mapantz said:

    I'm not going to argue with you. Take yourself to the named storm threads and read through the information provided. There is zero consistency when it comes to named storms. They've named them when it is just a simple kink in the isobars, and they've not named them when amber warnings have been issued.

    re winds aren't going to be bad. That's not true, 50mph inland is likely to cause some disruption. Trees falling due to wet ground in places etc. In fact, the wind forecast for here, tonight, are the strongest forecast so far this year.

    Not trying to argue with you mp and i fully agree with you about the inconsistencies with the naming of these storms. It's just a complete mess how they're handling it atm.

  2. 2 minutes ago, Mapantz said:

    Your previous post implies that the MetOffice don't name a storm because the amber warning is for rain.

    From the MetOffice:-

    Further information can be found here

    I never said they don't name a storm because of an amber warning for rain, just making a point that they don't always name a storm because of an amber warning and rightly so seeing as the winds aren't going to be that bad.

  3. 4 minutes ago, Mapantz said:

    That's irrelevant. The MetOffice will name a deep area of low pressure whether it brings rain, snow or gales, if it meets a certain criteria. Although, that criteria seems to have gotten lost in translation.

    They haven't named it though have they and i wouldn't really call it a deep low tbh, it's just your standard run of the mill atlantic depression.

  4. 6 minutes ago, coldwinter said:

    A very blocked 6z from the p, wouldnt surprise me if the 12z normal GFS goes backed to a more blocked regime, the overreaction on single OP runs is laughable on here, you'd think we were staring down the barrel of rampant zonality! Nobody is claiming a big freeze just yet, how can people be disappointed at heights trying to build to our NE repeatedly and further attacks on the PV is baffling to me! 

    What's even more laughable is certain people on here taking every single meto update as gospel, of course the updates are going to change from time to time but come on it could be a lot worse!

    • Like 8
  5. 13 minutes ago, Bristle boy said:

    Really??!!

    Snow on Northern hills in December is absolutely normal winter weather. Nowt unusual about it and imho does NOT indicate southerly tracking LP systems.

    The update says snow is possible, especially over northern hills, so they're not ruling out snow down south or down to low levels either are they. Just because they haven't mentioned snow for the south doesn't mean it's a downgrade.

    • Like 1
  6. 2 minutes ago, Geordiesnow said:

    I will also add, I hate the idea of 2 seperate threads, its been tried before and they never work as one thread becomes isolated and obviously it would'nt be this one!

     

    If you don't like what's being posted in here you could always use the other thread instead you know? it won't be so isolated then will it. Anyway I see plenty of posts in the other thread on a daily basis, so tbh i'm not sure what your on about.

    • Like 5
    • Thanks 2
  7. 9 minutes ago, summer blizzard said:

    Cornwall will have infrequent snow but it can get monster falls against embedded falls even if they melt quickly. 

    I would say the least snow location may be somewhere like Brighton, very hard to get a set up that even produces snow let alone talk about amounts. 

    Yeah true especially if they get a channel low but they've become quite rare, still not sure why he seems to think his location is the least snowiest though.

×
×
  • Create New...