Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Uncertainty

Members
  • Posts

    714
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Uncertainty

  1. 26 minutes ago, Kasim Awan said:

    Edit: not engaging in this, bit of a silly comment, if you want to contest what I am saying then use logic and evidence not bullying tactics.

    Kasim your views and knowledge are more than welcome here. I for one have learnt a great deal from your posts since you stated up on here. I think you give a balanced and unbiased view whereas although I do try to I am clearly in the cold crew and post far more frequently when things look good 😂

    No sugar coating from me tonight though in the extended - The eps is showing what the 46 has shown for many days. A relaxation -  as I alluded to a few weeks ago - in the pattern and a strong westerly flow. This has been well advertised across all suites and you can look to the mjo in p4 for a simplistic explanation. 
    image.thumb.png.ba1d9954f9906e6d5e744c16190f5718.png
    Here’s the p4 Nino composite - never been a good phase for me in winter.

    image.thumb.png.ebed18ef4825c14c4365a5d4082e22d2.png
     

    should this happen (it really should) it is NOT the end of winter. On the contrary, the signal for blocking to reinitialise end of Jan / early Feb (assisted by downwelling waves from above - the drip on the PCH plots) and the passage of the mjo to the WP is consistent. 
     

    In the meantime, next week’s low is the big chance for many. They often go south, but at face value the models are suggesting just n of the m4 is the current sweet spot.

    Finally, the 18z mean looks more wedgey ( and colder) but be careful what you wish for - as @Met4Castsays, one more big shift south and you can wave your historic snow event goodbye! 

    18z

    image.thumb.png.08f8ff50d037b1e823c799a9b5f27e02.png

     

    12z

    image.thumb.png.18ae35614a19408b6a23a6cb78fc6c05.png

     

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 2
    • Insightful 2
  2. 6 minutes ago, northwestsnow said:

    Mean is quietly upgrading ...

    image.thumb.png.ac3092b4eb1a7262b3679c883ecec112.png

    Looks just like the eps NWS. In fact, the members are excellent at 192 and the the long term solution from the op e.g heights transferring to the ne is not w/o support either.

    What a pub run btw, cold right out to the end…

    image.thumb.png.49b7dc14a919f5be83d0a77f8caff33d.png

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  3. The mjo moving into P4 more strongly than expected and for longer, as well as the the bigger push of cold into the states is likely responsible for the flattening across the ecm suite today. Need to see a few more 46 runs to really lose faith. Nevertheless, no ssw and the mjo in a poor position is not ideal. Hopefully we can get a gfs 12z style couple of snowstorms in first before the relaxation. After that, plenty of evidence for the blocking to return with continued strat disruption and the mjo moving towards the WP. 
     

    image.thumb.png.7c8f75211dbdfb56abb153c7577a2fdc.png
     

    image.thumb.png.5984f02b47b19e6c02a5515e06e610d5.png
     

    The 46 has backed off once or twice in the last few weeks and quickly got back in track. But the sooner the mjo gets a move on out of p4 the better.

     

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    • Insightful 2
  4. Massive shift in the geps around 300 hours (17th Jan)

    12z

    image.thumb.png.f4616331fcb772f88037d9b29b5497ff.png

    0z

    image.thumb.png.f8c5dc433a3a3bf621782e59efd7b51b.png

    The Greenland blocking is far stronger on the 12z, on the 0z it is already being eroded and the tilt of the Atlantic low no longer pumps WAA into Greenland. On the 12z the Atlantic energy is splitting which should prop up the high.

    Perhaps an even bigger shift on the 12z GEFS compared to its 6z run. The former has an incredible mean Greenland high whereas on the 6z it’s centred over the U.K. 

    12z 

    image.thumb.png.94f1188ce19b80727abc742faba62951.png

    6z

    image.thumb.png.59320ef475781ef9fce65e1c3059bd93.png

    Unsurprisingly, both means are significantly colder! Whilst there are still potential barriers to longevity (the gfs op goes from perfection to west based to flat real quick) the upgrades on the means are far more relevant when predicting how long our cold spell will persist for.

    image.png


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/99706-model-output-discussion-into-2024/?do=findComment&comment=4995109
    • Like 1
  5. Cansips, for January 2024, 10 months ago:

    image.thumb.png.0144973757739bac4ed19a06e8cf5b3c.png
     

    Cansips, June 2023 

    image.thumb.png.bdf8841c4aada3b279f2366a4ddc2b1e.png

    Cansips, today:

    image.thumb.png.ded8a3bbb8b04cc721675555233ef417.png

    What a phenomenal forecast. The seasonals have absolutely smashed it. It’s easy for them in a 2019/2020 (eg mega zonal) paradigm but predicting blocking that far out is hard. 
     

    The 46 has also done pretty well after some early wobbles.

    Peitao Pengs analogues have also done really well

    image.thumb.gif.b3519c357c71fdd6c4e2fe59aebc75b3.gif

    The cfs is and always has been garbage, here’s an effort from august that it persisted  with up until a few weeks ago. All this has done is throw doubt and apprehension into the mix. Fortunately, most of us were able to see past it. 

    image.thumb.png.a5bfbe949f44b231559ac163f6874b0d.png
     

    So there you have it. The long awaited early 2024 blocking is upon us. Weather forecasting is hard, but if you listen to the signals, experts,  telecons (EQBO, late Nino moving modoki, weak strat, mjo p1, fading iod, major +EAMT) and the models (if they show a really strong, consistent picture) then it is possible to go beyond ‘Fantasy Island’ and into the future. Read back through this thread and the winter preview thread. We called it. Great job folks.
     

    And so it begins…


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/99706-model-output-discussion-into-2024/?do=findComment&comment=4994008
    • Like 2
    • Insightful 2
  6. 2 minutes ago, Scott Ingham said:

    This is the big takeaway from me. That I think this will be a rapid trop response on top of rising AAM the holy grail due to the Canadian warming 

    The seasonals have been telling us this all along Scott. If they’re right, it’s a huge coup for long range forecasting:

    image.thumb.png.128ee62f88e46f070da3f64afd833d21.png

    That’s the JFM Cansips, from May!
     

     

    • Like 7
    • Insightful 1
  7. 1 minute ago, Andy8472 said:

    One lonely split on GEFS & the control run isn't too shabby 

    gensnh-2-7-384.png

    gensnh-0-7-384.png

    Enjoy your posts Andy; it’s good to have your input. The 6z ncep suite looks a little warmer to me than the 0z. Plenty of the geps suite look like they’d go on to split. I think we will see a reversal but it’s not quite ‘in the bag’. Would like to see the GEFS move towards the other two to increase confidence before we can really make a call.

    • Like 1
  8. A significant phase of amplification is emerging in the eps/GEFS around day 14-15.

    I expect this is linked more to tropical activity than the strat at this stage.

    The mjo is now forecast to move quite strongly into phase 1.

    image.thumb.png.70b3cd2e4f7e61049348ff6c0e7f4391.png

    The phase 1 January Nino composite (and I am in no way suggesting a linear relationship between phases and anomalies) is indicative of a strong N U.K. high. The unusually strong amp and the fact it is happening very soon give a bit more credence to the composite imho

    image.thumb.png.e68ba4d8dc89a28b6f4125d9f44373e6.png
     

    Given the lag, the GEFS and eps are not to be dismissed, the eps is almost identical to last night’s run.

    image.thumb.png.77b741d930d9eb44b7ed0cd3b1039ab7.png
     

    image.thumb.png.ba44783b94efee4dd4cc3bd9932399ff.png
     

    This is when the real internet begins…

     


    Original post: https://community.netweather.tv/topic/99584-model-output-discussion-into-winter/?do=findComment&comment=4981853
    • Like 2
  9. A significant phase of amplification is emerging in the eps/GEFS around day 14-15.

    I expect this is linked more to tropical activity than the strat at this stage.

    The mjo is now forecast to move quite strongly into phase 1.

    image.thumb.png.70b3cd2e4f7e61049348ff6c0e7f4391.png

    The phase 1 January Nino composite (and I am in no way suggesting a linear relationship between phases and anomalies) is indicative of a strong N U.K. high. The unusually strong amp and the fact it is happening very soon give a bit more credence to the composite imho

    image.thumb.png.e68ba4d8dc89a28b6f4125d9f44373e6.png
     

    Given the lag, the GEFS and eps are not to be dismissed, the eps is almost identical to last night’s run.

    image.thumb.png.77b741d930d9eb44b7ed0cd3b1039ab7.png
     

    image.thumb.png.ba44783b94efee4dd4cc3bd9932399ff.png
     

    This is when the real internet begins…

     

    • Like 5
    • Insightful 3
  10. 1 hour ago, bluearmy said:

    The gfs remains bullish on rotating the spv across the pole and ends up  n Greenland as it’s pushed across the pole by the warming 

    the gefs seems to be centered Barents Sea svaalbard to Novaya Zemlya 

    awaiting the eps - it has been more akin to the gefs but further towards ne scandi

    the gfs and ec op stand off on the speed of the warming continues. The gefs have taken a small step towards the gfs but the gap between the ops remains 4 days on that cold area in ne Siberia 

    interesting to see that the reversal in the strat grows at 30N and then extends northwards - currently flushing the stronger flow towards the trop as per below. The gfs ends with a tpv centred primarily across the pole. 
     

    image.thumb.png.0857b3178710468b7b176bea914c191f.png
     

    EDIT

    Eps updated 

    The mean at day 15 looks pretty much reversal with the outside height contour on the strat low across 90N 

    the model is a little ahead of the gefs in its rotational movement of the spv back towards n scandi /barents. We can see that the gefs are closer to svaalbard but as a day 15 mean it’s comparable 

    the gefs are not as close to a tech ssw. Eps spv is 2920 dam whilst gefs is 2880. 
     

    image.thumb.png.96fa490c3a983a03965a8fdfa80dc89a.png   IMG_2364.thumb.jpeg.eda4ba4b455df36b02fc86dbddd63bc9.jpeg

     

    Are you saying the eps are showing a mean reversal Nick? That would be quite something. And am I right in saying that the the 46 is now fundamentally a separate model and won’t necessarily follow on from the eps? 
     

    Whatever the GEFS are doing on the strat isn’t stopping them producing an eye catching block in the trop mind!

  11. The GEFS are really really keen on a major warming, look at the mean below

    image.thumb.png.3cbd3a89ceb9f4d6a28c08d96fad0b85.png

    Lots of geps members look to go the same way, though maybe a bit slower.

    we’re just a few days from knowing if we’re going to get an ssw… If we do get one, then one of the major pieces of the seasonal modelling puzzle (eg the question as to why the seasonals have been so keen on Jan-Mar blocking) will have fallen into place.

    Incidentally, the same set lose the Genoa +ve height anomaly by day 11, 

    image.thumb.png.4f2ac3c9d6599c6200a1a0bd5b33f9b2.png

    So interesting in both trop and strat…

    • Like 7
    • Insightful 1
  12. 2 minutes ago, Pembroke Dangler said:

    Just need these to come more into the reliable timeframe and not at 300+ hours and we can hope from mid to late January we see the response and cold can come in, this I feel is our only way for country wide cold for the rest of this winter.

    You’re probably right about the latter part; the reliability bit is true generally but it has been consistent on the ec46 that end week 2 / week 3 we might see a big disruption and now that’s coming into the view of the other two main ensembles. No full blown ssw in reliable forecast just yet either, but a significant warming looks likely with the flavour (e.g minor / major or if the latter displacement / split) still to be decided…

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...