Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

blizzard81

Members
  • Posts

    5,277
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by blizzard81

  1. 12 minutes ago, tight isobar said:

    With -counter (due respect(..

    Its a stagnant phase atm..and 2 be fully expected!.

    So quotation/Analysis will likely mirror, the likes ALREADY informed.

    And scrutinisation, of run 2 run synop- is invariable...and pointless..

    Xmas comes nxt week..and many a children await with exitment...but its NAILED..as a date in non-change/transfer...

    But our meteorolgical xmas...

    Is there...only father xmas is not yet sure when 2 land on the roof!!!!

    But the sleigh...is circling...!!

    I always respect your posts sir! Here's hoping

    • Like 6
  2. 2 minutes ago, tight isobar said:

    Yes you can...

    Although once a warming takes place and starts the flux..any 2ndary warm will be of almost imediate-..response...left hook..then upper cut 2 the chin!..

    Stradling through 'vatious'..i said id post an- Analysis...

    Though i'll wait until tmoz...

    Tonights..can be very decent..

    Although tmoz..will likely be mind blowing!!!...

    The shelves are there ...honestly!!!

    With all due respect, you have been saying this for quite a while now lol.

    • Thanks 1
  3. 1 minute ago, shaky said:

    There really isnt anything interesting to post at the moment bar the stratosphere situation!!infact if it wasnt for the ssw you be thinking we are heading for one of those 90s style winters block over southern europe and energy going over!!it really is that boring over the next 10 days lol!!

    Just beat me to it. The model output is mind numbingly boring and that's why it is quiet in here. We may have to wait another month before anything exciting happens on the ground so to speak.

  4. 3 minutes ago, lorenzo said:

    How is NWP meant to cope with this when even 4 models across the strat cannot agree... Peak Eddy Heat Flux anomalies inbound within the next 24-48 hrs.

    Simply put - not a chance any output has a ghost of a chance on reconciling on the NWP basis.

    The most we can hope for is some kind of continuity in the strat vis a vis the technical reversal - as for the trop - it's a crap shoot.

    I believe the phrase FergieWeather coined was Shannon Entropy - this more than any other phrase is redolent now.

     

     

    image.thumb.png.aa75979fd339ec1ca4357b733ac92799.pnggfs_nh-ehflx_20181220.thumb.png.27e69ab1e0d18a720c6f2422b957b12f.png

    Or on the other hand, does anybody really know how good or bad the NWP is? I know the point about the strat forecasts being more reliable than the trop forecasts but the fact remains that all the ensembles across the various models today are c**p. One would expect some degree of volatility in the ensembles by now but scant signs of this.

  5. All this anti-negative tosh really does my head in to be honest. 'stop being negative' 'the negative nellie's are back' etc, etc. People are just posting what they see - just let them be and allow them to express themselves, even if it isn't what you want to hear. By all means offer counter arguments if you disagree but just responding with the 'negative' insults is just down right silly and immature imo. 

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 3
  6. 17 minutes ago, bluearmy said:

    Quite a lot of odd posts on here this morning - in the famous words of mr b fawlty. - ‘what did you expect to see from a Torquay hotel window’ ............

    no one has been touting the ‘hanging gardens of Babylon’ so why some are expecting to see them is quite odd

    what is currently showing is that the ecm spreads can often be a better tool than the ecm clusters in the 7/10 day period - the upper ridge looks to be a little more suppressed than was showing a few days ago with the jet running across to our north 

    Your last paragraph sums up why people on here are despondent this morning. Very flat output today. 

    • Like 2
  7. 11 minutes ago, karlos1983 said:

    Here's a little fact for you all:

    "How the MetO forecast is worded varies markedly depending on who is on the Medium range shift!"

    some are reading way to much into this!

    Heard from reliable sources that Darren Bett was covering this shift today!

    • Like 3
  8. 9 minutes ago, bluearmy said:

    The 00z eps offer a route forward but it’s a slow burner ......mid lat ridging nw Europe and eastern Atlantic which exerts itself slowly nw towards se Greenland (NOT A GREENY HIGH).  at the same time an Atlantic trough dropping just west of the Azores and a developing scrussian trough could lead to an undercut of this ridge 

    note that Europe cools as we reach the end of week 2 which makes me think the trough to our east will be advecting some colder air  around the ridge 

    764CD073-2F12-4526-B8CB-E46E3FAE1E58.thumb.jpeg.dfd8a82e30f8925719d72be7584683f7.jpeg

    Yes, I am very encouraged by the ecm this morning. The op and ens are an improvement going forward compared to the last couple of runs. It seems to be a slow burner like you say. However, I think there is every chance things could be brought forward a few days as the ramifications of the strat warming sink into the model psyche. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...