Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

cheeky_monkey

Members
  • Posts

    10,087
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by cheeky_monkey

  1. 1 hour ago, LetItSnow! said:

     

     

    Looking at the overall stats, the summer of 1989 looks absolutely wonderful. I'd take it over 1976, 1995 and 2022. It wasn't just characterised by length (indeed taking into account May and September it knocks 1976 out of the park) but persistently nice temperatures and long sunny, comfortable spells that were hot but not too oppresive. Many of the nighttime temperatures looked comfortable bar a really sticky looking spell from the 20th to the 25th of July which was the hottest spell of the entire year. I'd be very happy to have a summer like 1989 in 2024, May and September included. We've had so much rain that I think we would be just fine... Just no winter like 1988/1989 for 2023/2024 and 1989/1990 for 2024/2025 please!!!

     

     

    nope 1995 was better IMO by a distance ..1989 was quite oppressive esp late June and July (decent storms in 1989 more thundery than 1995) reason 1995 was better it was a dry heat not too dissimilar to July 1983 which i again rate over July 1989...i would take May-Oct 1995 over the same period in 1989 but the two periods weather wise were very similar in my locations

  2. 51 minutes ago, *Stormforce~beka* said:

                                                                                                                                               Sunniest places (hours per year)

     Least sunny(hours)Sunniest(hours)

    1Bjørnøya (Svalbard, Norway)595.0                                                                              Yuma (USA)4015.3

    2Macquarie Island (Australia)806.5                                                                                 Phoenix (USA)3871.6

    3Tórshavn (Faroe Islands)841.0                                                                                       Aswan (Egypt)3862.8

    4Ostrov Vize (Arctic Russia)914.0                                                                                   Las Vegas (USA)3825.3

    5Rio Negro (Brazil)967.9                                                                                                     Tuscon (USA)3806.0

    Edmonton gets 321 sunny days per year and is the second sunniest city in Canada just behind Calgary.

    • Thanks 1
  3. 5 minutes ago, NEVES SCREAMER said:

    Pleasant enough today. Light breeze. Fair amount of cloud. Not desperately chilly. Had today and tomoz off. Nice day to get the final fall of leaves off the lawn.  Cleaned the lawnmower up. Sprayed a bit of WD40 round it. Keeps it ready for March when it revs in to action again! Cut a few branches back from the years growth. Enjoyable day keeping busy !

    I wont need my lawnmower until late May early June thats when the grass start growing again

  4. 14 hours ago, BartyHater said:

    Dunno if it’s OK to have a general moan in here (I’m sure someone will say if it isn’t) and as a newbie I apologise in advance if this has cropped up before, but something is seriously grinding my gears…

    TV weather presenters clearly no longer have set criteria with which to describe temperatures, so tonight for instance the local weather guy on BBC Spotlight described overnight lows of 5-8c as ‘cold’. 5-8c isn’t even cold as a daily max in Dec, in fact it’s close to the climatological average.

    Bad as this was, sadly I’ve heard far worse. One morning a few weeks ago Isobel Lang said ‘ it really is bitterly cold out there this morning, with temps close to freezing in some places’.

    I could go on and on….I won’t, as I’m sure others must have noticed some of the ludicrous language often used to describe absolutely bog standard temperatures.

    To be fair I’m sure I allow it to wind me up far to much for my own good/sanity, but rather than screaming at the telly or worse still launching something at the screen, I thought I’d get it off my chest and lower my BP a bit in here.😢

    Bring back Craig Rich 

  5. 36 minutes ago, DCee said:

    It's the rate of change that's most damaging. A warming planet is fine over 10000 or 100000 years, but over 100 years, that's hell for all ecosystems.

    says who? again in that respect we have a data set to refer to of exactly zero..its pure supposition..there has been 100+ years of warming without any collapse of ecosystems..which goes against what the doomsayers have been saying for the last 40 years ...i 100% guarantee that in 40 years time you will still be able to honeymoon in the Maldives and wont be wading through the streets of London knee deep in water. i also guarantee in 40 years we will have technologies at hand you cant even think or imagine today.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...