jonboy

Thursday 23.10.2014 07:58:35 64.669 -17.394 8.4 km 3.6 99.0 7.1 km ENE of Bárðarbunga Thursday 23.10.2014 07:55:01 64.684 -17.433 7.2 km 3.7 99.0 6.6 km NE of Bárðarbunga Thursday 23.10.2014 06:44:00 64.684 -17.398 8.0 km 3.8 99.0 7.9 km NE of Bárðarbunga Thursday 23.10.2014 06:42:35 64.677 -17.471 8.6 km 3.9 99.0 4.9 km NNE of Bárðarbunga Thursday 23.10.2014 06:26:59 64.683 -17.475 8.6 km 4.3 99.0 5.4 km NNE of Bárðarbunga Active this morning and a nice rise on the displacement GPS ongoing here http://en.vedur.is/earthquakes-and-volcanism/gps-measurements/bardarbunga/caldera/

5.7 for me please

Tuesday 21.10.2014 08:36:35 64.694 -17.442 15.6 km 5.3 99.0 7.3 km NE of Bárðarbunga Tuesday 21.10.2014 08:34:47 64.673 -17.458 6.7 km 4.7 99.0 5.0 km NE of Bárðarbunga The 5.3 is deep at 15.6km wonder what is moving down below!!

Monday 20.10.2014 13:58:57 64.672 -17.419 3.8 km 3.0 99.0 6.2 km NE of Bárðarbunga Monday 20.10.2014 13:31:06 64.659 -17.376 0.2 km 4.7 99.0 7.5 km ENE of Bárðarbunga Monday 20.10.2014 13:30:17 64.666 -17.399 3.2 km 4.1 99.0 6.8 km ENE of Bárðarbunga Monday 20.10.2014 13:27:57 64.671 -17.450 3.2 km 4.6 99.0 5.0 km NE of Bárðarbunga

Monday 20.10.2014 08:54:37 64.686 -17.462 4.2 km 5.0 99.0 6.0 km NNE of Bárðarbunga Monday 20.10.2014 01:00:23 64.612 -17.431 8.3 km 4.8 99.0 5.6 km SE of Bárðarbunga Monday 20.10.2014 00:38:21 64.619 -17.398 9.3 km 4.2 99.0 6.6 km ESE of Bárðarbunga On going drop and bounce back ongoing on the vertical displacement graph http://en.vedur.is/earthquakes-and-volcanism/gps-measurements/bardarbunga/caldera/ Could be another large one on its way

That looks big!!!

Friday 17.10.2014 07:14:11 64.670 -17.455 2.3 km 4.0 99.0 4.8 km NE of Bárðarbunga Given the drop thought it might have been bigger

Big drop occuring on the vertical displacement graph this morning

And a 3.9 Thursday 16.10.2014 12:49:47 64.669 -17.467 7.3 km 3.9 99.0 4.3 km NE of Bárðarbunga

Not only does geoff run this http://www.landscheidt.info/?q=node/50 but he also does research into what modulates the solar cycles always a fascinating read

Thursday 16.10.2014 09:25:30 64.669 -17.465 2.3 km 4.2 99.0 4.4 km NE of Bárðarbunga Thursday 16.10.2014 03:14:57 64.669 -17.449 4.0 km 5.0 99.0 4.9 km NE of Bárðarbunga Wednesday 15.10.2014 11:16:32 64.671 -17.449 4.3 km 5.4 99.0 5.1 km NE of Bárðarbunga Latest one shallow at 2.3km

Well if thats the best you can do the use of the usual tactics an methods I give up and you accuse me of not having an open mind

Influence of the sunspot cycle on the Northern Hemisphere wintertime circulation from long upper-air data sets Y. Brugnara1,2, S. Br¨onnimann1,2, J. Luterbacher3, and E. Rozanov4,5 1Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland 2Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, Bern, Switzerland 3Department of Geography, Climatology, Climate Dynamics and Climate Change, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany 4Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos, World Radiation Center, Davos, Switzerland 5Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science ETH, Zurich, Switzerland Correspondence to: S. Br¨onnimann (stefan.broennimann@giub.unibe.ch) Received: 15 October 2012 – Published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.: 23 November 2012 Revised: 28 May 2013 – Accepted: 29 May 2013 – Published: 3 July 2013 Abstract. Here we present a study of the 11 yr sunspot cycle’s imprint on the Northern Hemisphere atmospheric circulation, using three recently developed gridded upper-air data sets that extend back to the early twentieth century. We find a robust response of the tropospheric late-wintertime circulation to the sunspot cycle, independent from the data set. This response is particularly significant over Europe, although results show that it is not directly related to a North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) modulation; instead, it reveals a significant connection to the more meridional Eurasian pattern (EU). The magnitude of mean seasonal temperature changes over the European land areas locally exceeds 1K in the lower troposphere over a sunspot cycle. We also analyse surface data to address the question whether the solar signal over Europe is temporally stable for a longer 250 yr period. The results increase our confidence in the existence of an influence of the 11 yr cycle on the European climate, but the signal is much weaker in the first half of the period compared to the second half. The last solar minimum (2005 to 2010), which was not included in our analysis, shows anomalies that are consistent with our statistical results for earlier solar minima.

Are you saying therefore the paper is invalid or the authors don't know what they are talking about? What would have been your comments if I had not mentioned the journal?

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/10/14/water-temperature-of-the-great-lakes-is-over-6-degrees-colder-than-normal/ Great lakes upto 6 degrees cooler than last year and 3 degrees cooler than long term average. Will be interesting to see if we have early ice growth this year

Long_term.pdf I found this which is an supplemented version of an article published in energy and environment in September 2011. It's title is Long-Term Instrumental and Reconstructed Temperature Records Contradict Anthropogenic Global Warming This is the final sentence of the conclusion: The hypothesis expressed here suggests that the sun could be predominantly responsible for the 100-year-long rises and falls in temperature over the last 2000 years.

We should also remember that evidence shows volcanic activity increases when we enter low solar cycles as we are presently

Most likely lack of comment is because it doesn't fit in with the general dogma that the oceans are warming I do agree that with these colder anomalies it is less likely that we will see the same intense storms coming off the atlantic this winter and what is likely they will be more southerly as well.

two actually as below 10 mins apart Monday 13.10.2014 09:26:47 64.616 -17.365 6.8 km 4.5 99.0 8.2 km ESE of Bárðarbunga Monday 13.10.2014 09:25:06 64.771 -17.876 1.1 km 0.7 90.02 10.4 km ENE of Nýidalur Monday 13.10.2014 09:16:48 64.667 -17.442 2.0 km 4.8 99.0 5.0 km NE of Bárðarbunga

Great post Tamara almost a ramp !!!! Given the present ongoing eruption in iceland and the vast quantities of SO2 being pumped into the atmosphere and its effect on likely ozone production this can only bode well for any SSW events this winter IMO

Reported as a 4.8 Friday 10.10.2014 11:26:10 64.672 -17.487 4.8 km 4.8 99.0 4.0 km NNE of Bárðarbunga Beat me to it

When GW is willing to answer the question I asked prior to BFTV post then I will respond. But as always you guys would rather respond by asking questions to divert away from the original point. Sorry but not playing

If it was private then don't use an open forum If your relying on skeptical science as your source then is it any wonder you think the way you do regading solar effects on our climate

How dare you use the third person that is just plain rude

Why must we see another high transit year what are your climatic reasons for this? Anybody reading your post would think we haded gained some 1500km3 of ice which makes an increase in volume of 3200km3 since the low point of 2012 which is remarkable given your comments I stand by my comment I believe this is a start of a trend and it is solar driven as we enter the downward slope to a very deep solar minimum