Jump to content
Thunder?
Local
Radar
Hot?

SqueakheartLW

Members
  • Posts

    1,403
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SqueakheartLW

  1. 9 minutes ago, Frigid said:

    -11C was showing for me on the morning of the 15th, took a good half an hr for the car to defrost and warm up. 

    A truly spectacular winter's day, akin to those mornings in Dec 2010. Blue skies and a deep, thick frost. I know it's unlikely but I hope to see more this upcoming winter. 

    If only that cold could have hung on till at least Christmas Day. That would have made December 2022 more memorable and would have put it in the sub 1C CET club and if it had clung on to the end of the year 2010 and 1890 could have been under threat. Also we wouldn't have got the 11C CET year either.

    • Like 3
  2. 17 hours ago, CreweCold said:

    This would be decent for Christmas...very seasonal

    image.thumb.png.5aa427e865c2995829398cb1b7ec5135.png

    Followed by an absolute snow machine for New Years

    image.thumb.png.f3c2957a382d2fef9bee42decee0d599.png

    It remains cold well into the new year

    image.thumb.png.eaabd658c0fb92f107c17cf8493584ce.png

    This is what I'm seeing with the CFS at the moment. It's flitting between a Dec 09-Jan10 scenario and an 87/88. I believe the stakes to be really high this year as we're facing two scenarios...winter proper or a horror show. A proper dichotomy.

    Both are El Nino winters and both in the ascending part of their respective solar cycles but very different in how they turned out.

    Guess what the major difference is between those 2 winters

    • Winter 1987/88 was a WQBO winter
    • Winter 2009/10 was an EQBO winter

    Personally based on this and the fact winter 2023/24 looks like it will be EQBO then as a coldie I'd hope this will favour the more 2009/10 solutions the CFS keeps throwing into its output over the 1987/88 but then knowing our luck the 1987/88 lot will verify in the end.

    • Like 1
  3. 5 hours ago, HafrenLMP1 said:

    I actually preferred Dec 09/Jan 10 to the following year......so I'd gladly take that now. 87/88 I certainly wouldn't....and Christmas Day was nigh on warm.....

    The ideal cold winter based on years from 2008 onwards for me would be as follows:

    Nov 24th to 30th 2010 - Obvious reasons here

    Dec 1st to 6th 2010 - As above

    Dec 7th to 10th 2017 - A nice short cold snap with a little snow

    Dec 11th to 15th 2022 - Really liked the most severe part of this cold spell

    Dec 16th to 25th 2010 - The extreme cold of this period wins it for me

    Dec 26th to 31st 2009 - Not a lot to choose from here to end December but it was between 2009 and 2020

    Jan 1st to 12th 2010 - An obvious choice here due to the cold and snow 

    Jan 13th to 21st 2013 - Probably the best cold and snowy period between 2008 and 2023 for this middle part of January

    Jan 22nd to 31st 2015 - No decent cold snap or spell that I can recall for late January between 2008 and 2023. Either 2015 or 2019 here and as I got more snow in 2015 than 2019 I picked that one

    Feb 1st to 14th 2009 - The easy pick for me. The best first half of February cold spell of them all. Several snow events too.

    Feb 15th to 25th 2013 - Nothing decent that I can recall between these dates for cold and snow but 2013 for me was probably the coldest for this period between 2008 and 2023

    Feb 26th to 28th 2018 - Couldn't miss out the famous beast from the east 2018 here. An easy number 1 choice to end February.

    For March for me we have 1st to 3rd 2018 as well as 17th to 19th 2018. Also 20th to 23rd 2008 or 22nd to 31st 2013 as picks too.

    • Like 4
  4. 3 hours ago, jules216 said:

    Thing that its often overlooked is that 2015/16 was going rather nicely, nearly whole of January until 26th was cold only that stupid minor SSW re-shuffled the very promising acumulated cold. Again undone by badly timed SSW, like 1987,2002,2009,2021 etc. All of these occasions SSW did more harm then good for us in central Europe as it shifts the cold away to North and West Europe. We need no SSW and just below average zonal winds just like 2016/17 and -EA pattern not -NAO which does often more bad then good, the closer you go to central Europe from west.

    Not very often we can get a good pattern for cold for basically the whole of Europe but I would say a Scandi high linking up with a Greeny high and troughing through the Med all the way from Iberia to Greece is the jackpot pattern but is quite uncommon.

    Usual thing is either:

    1. Default +NAO pattern that makes most of Europe mild but maybe further east can still be cold depending on the location of the dreaded Euro high.
    2. -NAO pattern which tends to favour western Europe and can often set up Euro trough that makes eastern Europe mild.
    3. Sceuro high that is good for eastern Europe cold but is bad for us in western Europe with mild southerlies.

     

    • Like 1
  5. 1 minute ago, Weather-history said:

    No thanks. February was off the scale in term so wetness here. Absolutely ridiculous.

    If I chose a milder winter if we couldn't have a colder one I'd pick the previous one 2018/19.

    At least it wasn't a washout winter and had a little cold and snow 2nd half of Jan and early Feb and at least had that memorable warm spell later in Feb.

    2019/20 was just a horror show that generally got worse as the autumn .... errm I mean winter went on.

    • Like 3
  6. If models are correct with both a Super Nino and the northern blocking it will be of interest to see how this interacts with the EQBO.

    As we have no historical events with both Super Nino and EQBO together (1982, 1997 and 2015 all WQBO leading up to the winters) then we don't know how this will play out.

    As for the polar vortex in Super Nino winters we have a whole mixture. 1997/98 was a weaker vortex with no SSW but 2015/16 was a monster polar vortex of doom until the biggest and earliest final warming on record for March 2016.

    Could the EQBO result in a much earlier SSW and a much better chance of a colder more blocked winter which is showing up in the models for the most part.

    image.thumb.png.df85f3c991abfbd8e1e484714885692e.png

    As for the CFS I'd say this is

     

    C omplete

    F abricated

    S ***

     

    Therefore one for the bin.

    • Like 3
  7. 4 hours ago, Uncertainty said:

    image.thumb.png.828cb4bc5cda9480eeabe91a99bd9c87.png
     

    The seasonals have update and just look at the euro low anomaly for NDJ on Glosea Don! What a chart! You would absolutely be looking at an ssw with that Aleutian low / +SCAND setup too.

    So we have Glosea, system 5 (ECMWF) and the bcc seasonal on board, 3 big hitters. But what about the rest?

    The ECCC is, frankly, ridiculous. 2009 redux there.

    image.thumb.png.3694057ea83536d95e723e7361f79c20.png


    The JMA, which incidentally was +NAO in its last update, joins the UKMO with a scandi high / SE euro low combo

    image.thumb.png.3622d6d22de2e404f1bb4f5eb9e4e59e.png

    Meteofrance has a stonking Greenland high 

    image.thumb.png.7c80dff7cc185694fcf86609a306326a.png

    Just a slight nitpick with the hint of Iberian heights, 2018/19 had that issue. Still, follows the blocking trend.

    DWD joins the party

    image.thumb.png.9f1f1c1a59e15663f1986258b8accd0c.png
     

    The cfs, typically, is different and has a broad U.K. trough. 

    And all this despite all these models forecasting a strong, perhaps super El Niño that, at least initially, looks to be east based. Both of which are canonically +nao promoters.

     

     

    What a good early start to the winter discussion with those blocked looking charts.

    One crucial thing I have noticed on all of them which is absent this time on long range model output which has been a default certain addition before now is .....

     

     

    NO NE PACIFIC RIDGE

     

     

    Maybe puts us more in the game this time with the NE Pacific trough this time around.

    • Like 6
  8. 7 hours ago, Don said:

    So I wonder why the latest ECM seasonal is going for a cold blocked winter?!

    3 hours ago, Chesil View said:

    just a though but perhaps climate change may be changing the modellings percieved wisdom around the typical effects of a strong El nino.

    Could be that unknown new factor of super Nino combined with EQBO which should be well underway by the time winter comes. Since we only have recent history of how super Nino works when combined with a WQBO then it is a big unknown and a nice waiting game to see what happens.

    As SSW's seem to be more common in both El Nino's and also with EQBO then we may be seeing the models factoring in a combination of both. This means we could get

    • Another 1997/98 or 2015/16 repeat with no SSW if the EQBO fails to deliver
    • A lesser version of the above years if super Nino effects are moderated by EQBO
    • As Feb 1983 shows we can get cold weather within a super Nino winter so we could see at least 1 cold month
    • Or we get the holy grail winter with super Nino effects combining with EQBO and a big polar vortex killer SSW all combining to potentially set up a 2009/10 on steroids or possibly a 1962/63 repeat,
    • Like 3
  9. Latest monthly update from me now ECM have issued August ENSO forecast

    July 2023 assessment

    As with previous updates of this nature I will first show how ECM and CFS fared against the average monthly NINO values from NOAA and Tropical Tidbits

    Untitled.thumb.png.40f5209b23d49d96b31f98cc3525ef0e.png

    Yet again a general overestimation by the models a month ago for the NINO 4, 3.4 and 3 regions. ECM was well off the mark in the main body of the Pacific and it was generally a big well done to CFS here that was actually quite accurate for the main NINO regions.

    CFS gets a big black mark for NINO 1+2 as it was way off what actually happened in July and in fact ECM had the right idea here although it did overestimate a bit.

    August 2023 forecast and comparison

    Here's the latest anomaly predictions by both ECM and CFS for all 4 NINO regions from August 2023 to February 2024. Also included is how the latest forecast compares with the one a month ago and if the values are lower, higher or the same as last month.

    Untitled.thumb.png.33eab543eee462896c4fce1ae5e88e42.png

    Generally grim reading if you are hoping to avoid a Super Nino, especially with ECM that has upgraded the strength of the event compared with July 2023 which in itself was also an upgrade compared with the June 2023 forecast. ECM almost goes for a basin wide super event with only NINO 4 not getting to super.

    CFS is a bit better but even it is an upgrade compared to a month ago and also CFS has a little bit more of a CP element to the event by the time winter comes whilst ECM just goes all out for super EP.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Insightful 3
  10. 16 hours ago, sebastiaan1973 said:
    16 hours ago, Don said:

    Lets hope it's picked up on the correct trend at this very early stage!  That would be a genuine cold winter, if it were to come off.  Looking blocked for all three months!

    4 hours ago, Chesil View said:

    Indeed Don that Cansips run is very wintry for the UK.  The low anomalies over continental Europe for all three months certainly different to recent winters if it comes off. As Crewe has pointed out in  the past high anoms to our north  are not that much help without low anoms to our south over Europe.

    Looks better the further into the winter too. A back loaded signal which is typical with El Nino

    The February 2024 one looks most wintry with lower heights closer to the UK

    image.thumb.png.cac457d7afc57ea2a687237b46d92c20.pngimage.thumb.png.35dfa6d3c32b0395df8ed301c5019d1c.png

    image.thumb.png.9e98fc85755488c00fa3cf2816dc8210.pngimage.thumb.png.5f8e9d7b6cb6ce69360fb5e01369324b.png

    Unfortunately CFS still going for borderline strong/super Nino which could scupper it all

    • Like 1
  11. 45 minutes ago, summer blizzard said:

    QBO is in the upper atmosphere, not the oceanic surface. 

    I did find a link between ENSO and the QBO. My post below in the link

    EQBO favours CP El Nino's over EP El Nino's.

    It also appears to fight against the development of the strongest El Nino events too.

    • Like 2
  12. 3 hours ago, Addicks Fan 1981 said:

    Niño 1 & 2 3.0 

    Niño 3        1.7

    Niño 3.4     1.2

    Niño 4        0.8

    A nice step in the right direction for Nino 1+2 with that 0.5C cooling.

    Need Nino 1+2 to end up cooler than Nino 4 to set up a modoki event then hope that Nino 3.4 ends up the warmest region. Nino 3 is still a bit too warm for my liking if we want a decent chance of a colder winter.

    • Like 1
  13. 55 minutes ago, BruenSryan said:

    Can you answer the same question I gave to you about your data please?

    QBO reconstruction is from:

    AGUPUBS.ONLINELIBRARY.WILEY.COM

    Unfortunately I don't have a source for the ENSO table, somebody just shared it with me back on Gavs comment box in the day which you were also on and I haven't felt the need to question it.

    https://psl.noaa.gov/gcos_wgsp/Timeseries/Data/nino34.long.anom.data

    In the above data series dating from as far back as 1870. The 1965 and 1966 rows look like this

    1965 -0.57 -0.36 -0.34 -0.09 0.19 0.45 0.81 1.25 1.26 1.61 1.54 1.45

    1966 1.13 0.83 0.83 0.54 -0.06 0.14 0.23 -0.10 -0.05 -0.05 -0.37 -0.26

    A peak of +1.61C on this series

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...